FREE NEWSLETTER

If you don’t know what you’re paying in investment costs, you’re likely paying too much.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Americans and their credit cards

"
I agree that"we are common sense people" that are a minority. But I disagree with your statement"we are not blessed". Knowing that ALL that we have ARE Blessings helps me to stay appreciative every day for our finances, our health, our family, and our accumulated stuff. For all of it, we thank God
"
- L H
Read more »

How Did You Find Paid Work After Retiring from Your Primary Career?

"Good question. I truly believe everyone and there journeys are different. After 33 years of commission route sales and the hectic pace and hours that went along with it I knew I didn't want to sit around or start a similar rat race in retirement. Living in a smaller town it's all about connections, everybody knows someone so it's fairly easy to find a job. A lot of it is not what you know but who you know. I retired for three days 😂 before starting to work at our Middle School as a teachers aide. After almost fifteen years of that I retired again. I have now worked seasonally for the last eight years in our city's Parks department, enjoying the outdoors at a much slower pace along with no pressure of any kind"
- L H
Read more »

You Heel!

"I fear a lot of those small repair guys are in their death knells (those that haven't already succumbed). It's not good for the repair, recycle in the interests of the planet but as goods have got cheaper (and less durable) the consumer incentive is heavily skewed toward dispose and replace. Plus vicious cycle is less work , higher piece rate to make rent/profit - means less likely to be viable to new customers."
- bbbobbins
Read more »

Beyond Bank Accounts

I OPENED MY FIRST bank account in the US at a local credit union (CU) close to my workplace. The CU had several convenient offers for employees of our company. With minimal effort, I opened checking and savings accounts, got free checkbooks and a credit card despite having no credit history in the US.

I was so pleased with the convenience that I handled all my banking needs through this CU for many years. That included direct deposit of my salary, payments and withdrawals, a car loan, and certificates of deposit (CDs) as my savings grew. I still maintain my checking account here and occasionally enjoy special favors as a longtime loyal customer.

Eventually, I realized that I earned very little interest from the bank deposits. I shopped around, found other banks with better rates, opened several accounts here and there, and moved my money around.

I felt good about being proactive and getting a better return on my cash reserve. But that feeling was short-lived as I started learning more about personal finance and investments. Tired of chasing yields in bank accounts, I eventually embraced US Treasurys (debt issued and backed by the US Government) as my alternative to savings accounts and CDs.

For those unfamiliar with US Treasurys, think of them as CDs with maturities ranging from four weeks to 30 years. They're widely used as a "safe investment" by individual, institutional and even sovereign investors around the world.

There are some key differences, though. Bank deposits are insured only up to $250,000. US Treasurys, on the other hand, are backed by the full faith and credit of the US Government. Therefore, there is virtually no default risk regardless of the investment amount.

Treasury interest rates, both short-term and long-term, are heavily influenced by monetary policy actions of the US Federal Reserve (Fed). Treasury interest rates directly affect many interest rates we encounter in everyday life: bank accounts, CDs, mortgage, car loans, personal and business loans, and so on.

Treasury interest rates are often higher than comparable bank products. Why? Because the intermediary financial institutions take their cut for operational costs and profits. Result? Suboptimal, or sometimes almost non-existent, interest on bank deposits.

But wait. What if I need my money back?

With bank deposits, I can walk in and withdraw cash from my account. If my money is locked in a CD, I may have to pay a penalty for early withdrawal, but I can still access it fairly quickly. What happens if I'm holding Treasurys? Do I need to wait until maturity?

That leads us to another important aspect of US Treasurys: their extremely high liquidity.

I can certainly buy newly issued Treasurys and wait until maturity, but I don't have to wait for these events. Investors around the world buy and sell Treasurys in the open market every day, making them one of the most liquid investments in existence.

Their liquidity, safety and meaningful return make Treasurys a compelling alternative for both short- and long-term cash reserves.

Sounds interesting? That's exactly how I felt after doing my own research. All I needed to figure out was the best way to invest in them.

Instead of buying Treasurys directly from the US Treasury, I use my brokerage accounts and buy and sell individual Treasurys or Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the open market, just like stocks or funds. (I used to participate in Treasury auctions through the brokerage account to buy new issues and set my holdings to auto-roll upon maturity, but I eventually stopped doing that to keep things simple.)

For annual expenses and short-term cash needs, I like short-term, highly liquid, Treasury ETFs with a practically negligible expense ratio.

For money expected in three to four years, I favor short- and intermediate-term Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) ETFs. TIPS have a lower interest rate compared to equivalent regular Treasurys, but their principal is adjusted with inflation, helping mitigate the risk of unexpected inflation.

For cash reserves further into the future, five years or more, my preference is a ladder of individual TIPS bonds, each maturing in a specific future year. Bond trading is slightly more involved than ETFs or stocks, so target-maturity TIPS ETFs can also be a reasonable alternative despite their slightly higher management fees.

Is there a catch compared to keeping money in conventional bank accounts?

I can't think of any, but there are two noticeable differences worth understanding.

First, unlike money sitting in bank accounts, Treasury investments fluctuate in value because they constantly change hands in open markets. For short-term Treasurys, the fluctuations are usually tiny. For intermediate- and long-term Treasurys, the swing can be more noticeable, especially when there's a major change in the interest rate expectation. Thankfully, these fluctuations are usually modest, and over time Treasurys often come out ahead compared to bank deposits.

The second difference deserves a bit more attention.

With a bank account, you can get hold of your money almost immediately. Treasury investments, however, may take a couple of business days to turn into spendable cash. You need to sell the ETF or bond during market hours. Once the transaction settles, usually the next business day, the proceeds can then be transferred out to the checking account for spending. In some cases, you may be able to carry on your spending activities directly from the brokerage account.

Over time, I shifted most of my liquid savings to Treasurys because of the improved result. Yet I still see many people leaving large cash balances in bank products or chasing yields from one bank to another.

I suspect the main reason is simple: lack of familiarity with US Treasurys.

  Sanjib Saha retired early from software engineering to dedicate more time to family and friends, pursue personal development and assist others as a money wellness mentor. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is the president and cofounder of Dollar Mentor, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization offering free investment and financial education. Follow his nonprofit on LinkedIn, and check out Sanjib’s earlier articles.
Read more »

Reaching Two-thirds of a Century!

"Rick, Happy 67th. I've enjoyed your articles over the years and appreciate your volunteerism with tax aid program. Best of luck in making it to the century mark."
- Blue Collar RE
Read more »

The Intentional Spendthrift

"When Jonathan planned to move to Philadelphia, he reached out to me because it was my hometown. One of the things he grew to love was the plethora of BYO restaurants in the city and surrounding areas. Many are Italian, but there is a nice mix of other types, as well as a range of prices. We used to trade BYO recommendations. I miss that."
- Rick Connor
Read more »

TreasuryDirect changing login procedure to mandate ID.me later in 2026

"In the county I live in there recently has been just two smaller local financial institutions who still redeemed US government paper savings bonds. Both financial institutions (one a bank with a state charter, one a credit union) has limited that service strictly for their own account holders whose banking accounts are with long term customers with active accounts. With all of the changes currently occurring at Treasury Direct my expectation is the number of financial institutions redeeming old paper savings bonds for customers will soon be zero. Over the counter sales of paper savings bonds ended in 2012 and the purchase of paper savings Bonds using overpayment of taxes (which next to no one did) ended in 2025. If you own paper US Bonds you are likely doing your heirs a favor by redeeming them sooner rather than later."
- William Perry
Read more »

Tax Complications – How SS Benefits interact with Other Income

"Hung, You are welcome. I have become a big fan of Dinkytown's 1040 calculator for quick estimates. I believe that AARP's calculator is based on Dinkytown's also. The calculations in the original post can be completed in a few minutes."
- Rick Connor
Read more »

Feeling TIPSy?

NOT TOO LONG ago, Treasury Inflation Protected Security (TIPS) was a relatively obscure investment for safe long-term fixed-income investments. For the first twenty years of the new century, consumer prices were mostly stable or rising at a too-slow-to-notice rate. Why bother with anything related to inflation? Sadly, persistently low inflation made us complacent on the biggest long-term risk of bond investments -- the insidious unexpected inflation that robs us of the purchasing power of our “safe” investments. Yes, let’s not forget that the biggest risk of bond or bond-like investments is unexpected inflation. Any bond or CD with a maturity beyond a few years must either offer a sufficiently high interest rate to compensate for sudden bouts of inflation, or have its principal adjusted for the inflation actually realized. The former is nearly impossible to find without sacrificing safety. The latter is what TIPS is for. To be clear, the market and investors always expect some level of inflation. Therefore, a bond’s effective interest rate - measured by its YTM (Yield to Maturity) - must be high enough to not only compensate for “expected” inflation and the uncertainties around it but also provide a meaningful increase in the purchasing power of the original principal.  A concrete example might help. Consider a 10-year US Treasury nominal bond with a face value of $1,000, selling at $1,000 and paying 5% annual interest. The interest rate reflects the expectations about inflation and other factors over the next 10 years. The rate would be lower if market expected lower inflation, and higher if market expected the opposite. The omnipresence of inflation means we’re likely to lose some purchasing power when we get our $1,000 in 10 years. It won’t buy what $1,000 buys today. By how much? That’s the thousand dollars question (pun intended).  There isn’t a readily available number that explains why that 10-year Treasury Bond yields 5% instead of 3% or 7%. Investors essentially take a leap of faith that annual inflation stays low enough over the 10-year period for the interim interests to compensate for the purchasing power loss, plus some changes. Most of us are perfectly comfortable assuming that inflation won’t be as high as 5% for 10 years. But are we fooling ourselves? I suggest using an inflation calculator to see for ourselves. Spoiler alert: Late 1960s through early 1980s can be an eye-opening period. How’d we feel if the next 10 years turn out to be something similar? Think about how you might feel when you safekeep your money in a so-called secure investment, give up higher returns available from risky investments, and then encounter an inflationary regime. Your minimum expectation was that your purchasing power would remain intact and perhaps improve a little by the time your bond matures. Instead, unforeseen inflation erodes your purchasing power and compromises the financial goal the fund was supposed to cover.  Your “safe” investment fails you completely. You realize that it wasn’t safe at all.  If unexpected inflation is so devastating, why are we so lax about it?  I can think of two reasons.  First, our minds haven’t adapted to the reality that, unlike to a “real” asset like a bag of rice or a gallon of gasoline, money in its current form is inherently self-eroding. It slowly loses its worth over time. A hundred dollars sitting around will still be a hundred dollars next year, but it won’t buy the same amount. We don’t intuitively perceive the continuous loss of purchasing power. Even when we do internalize it with some effort, we get used to the “pace” of the loss. In other words, we view inflation as steady and unexpected inflation as highly unlikely. Alas, all it takes is a single prolonged inflationary period to change that perception. By then, however, the damage to existing fixed income investments may already be done. Frankly, I’d be very wary of keeping my long-term “safe” money -- fund that I need to preserve beyond a three-year horizon - in any form that isn’t protected against unexpected inflation. For bond investments, the most meaningful option would be TIPS. Why? Because, in addition to being secured by the full faith and credit of the US Government just like any other Treasury securities, TIPS provides three important assurances upfront. First, it provides protection against unexpected inflation, which is a realized inflation that differs from what we expected when purchasing it. If the actual inflation averages 12% instead of the expected 2%, the principal is automatically adjusted to reflect the actual inflation. No guesswork or unexpected risk involved. Second, it provides a “real interest rate” upfront that tells us how much the purchasing power of the investment will increase over time, regardless of what the actual inflation turns out to be. Buying a 10-year TIPS with real 2% annual interest means the investment’s purchasing power will grow 2% per year over the holding period, before considering taxes and other factors. The third aspect is more nuanced. It involves the possibility of inflation being lower than expected, or even negative inflation (aka deflation). Let me elaborate. If a regular nominal 10-year Treasury Bond offers 5% annual yield and an equivalent TIPS offers a real annual interest rate of 2.75%, the market-implied inflation, the breakeven inflation rate, is roughly 2.25% (5% minus 2.75%). Actual inflation, of course, will be known only after 10 years when the bond matures. Suppose the actual inflation turns out to be only 1.25%. The nominal Bond investor would end up with more purchasing power than the TIPS investor because the TIPS principle would be adjusted by only the actual 1.25% inflation rate.  The primary objective of the TIPS investor would still have been met: preserving and improving purchasing power by about 2.75% annually. But there would be a “missed opportunity”. The nominal Treasury investor would end up with even greater purchasing power. Does it mean that a TIPS investor can face an unlimited opportunity cost if inflation turns out to be negative? What happens if the actual inflation is, hypothetically speaking, negative 5%, in a severely deflationary period? Does the TIPS investor get back proportionately reduced principal at maturity? Thanks to the third assurance of TIPS, the answer is NO.  TIPS guarantees that the principal returned at maturity will never fall below the original face value. During periods of deflation, the inflation-adjusted principal can fall below its face value and the interim interest payments will decline accordingly. But at maturity, the principal is floored at the original principal amount. Therefore, the breakeven inflation rate, the difference between the yield of a nominal Treasury bond and the real yield of an equivalent TIPS, represents the maximum annual yield advantage that the nominal bond can have over TIPS in an unexpectedly low inflation regime.  To summarize, a TIPS investor gets unlimited protection against unexpectedly high inflation, while accepting a limited opportunity cost should the actual inflation be low or even negative. The magnitude of that trade-off is reflected in the breakeven inflation rate at the time of the TIPS purchase.  An aside: given the destructive impact of deflation on economy and society, policy makers are generally more concerned about preventing prolonged deflation than about preventing modest inflation. Therefore, prolonged deflation is usually considered less likely. Still, we cannot ignore deflation risk altogether and should be prepared for the possibility that TIPS can underperform a nominal bond if inflation runs low.  Therefore, the decision to favor TIPS over an equivalent nominal Bond hinges in part on the current breakeven inflation rate. If it’s low enough, favoring TIPS can be an easy decision. Getting unlimited protection against unexpectedly high inflation is worth accepting the relatively small opportunity cost if inflation comes below the breakeven rate. There is, however, a cautionary note about buying TIPS bonds in the secondary market, especially older issues. Consider a 30-year TIPS bond issued 20 years ago and a 10-year TIPS issued within last 6 months. Both might appear to be valid choices if they mature within a few months of each other and offer similar yields. But beneath the surface, one may be more favorable than the other.  The older TIPS will likely have a much higher inflation-adjusted principal because it accumulated 20 years of inflation adjustments. But the protection against unexpected deflation applies only to the bond’s original face value, which is typically $1,000.  In a prolonged deflationary period, the older bond has much more room for its inflation-adjusted principal to decline before reaching the $1,000 floor. The newer issue, whose adjusted principal is much closer to the $1,000 face value, has less exposure to this risk. Therefore, all else being equal, I’d favor a TIPS with a low inflation-adjusted factor when buying in the secondary market. All things considered, my vote goes to TIPS for long-term “safe” investments, provided the break-even inflation is reasonably low. For secondary market purchases, however, a high inflation-adjustment factor would give me pause.   Sanjib Saha retired early from software engineering to dedicate more time to family and friends, pursue personal development and assist others as a money wellness mentor. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is the president and cofounder of Dollar Mentor, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization offering free investment and financial education. Follow his nonprofit on LinkedIn, and check out Sanjib’s earlier articles.
Read more »

Federal debt

"As long as the people who run the show keep thinking the way to get out of debt is to cut income it is going to get exponentially worse."
- Kenn Garner
Read more »

$40 Trillion of Debt

SOME MILESTONES are auspicious. Others are not. This week, the Treasury announced that the federal government’s debt had topped $40 trillion for the first time. Government debt is nothing new, but the problem is now of more concern, for two reasons. First, the scale has grown. An apples-to-apples way to look at the government’s debt load is to compare it to GDP—the economy’s total annual output. On this basis, outstanding debt now exceeds 100% of GDP, a level we haven’t seen since the period immediately after World War II. That brings us to the second concern: If the government isn’t able to balance its books while the economy is strong, as it is today, lawmakers will have less flexibility to act when the next recession occurs. For a brief period about five years ago, a theory known as modern monetary policy entered the conversation. The idea, popularized by a book titled The Deficit Myth, was that we shouldn’t be so concerned with deficits—that the U.S. government should be able to borrow more or less as much as it wants. What we’ve seen, though, is that eventually deficits do matter. In simple terms, the government now takes in about $6 trillion per year in revenue, but it's spending almost $8 trillion, resulting in deficits of roughly $2 trillion. And just like a consumer who's run up a big credit card bill, interest payments now consume an ever-larger portion of annual spending. In round numbers, the government this year will spend about one in every six tax dollars it collects on interest and will spend more on interest than on defense. Why have the numbers gotten so much worse? The first factor was Covid. The government had to take extraordinary measures to pull the economy out of recession. But while that spending was mostly justified, the problem is that Congress grew accustomed to larger budget shortfalls and has been unwilling to rein things back in. Congress, in fact, went in the opposite direction when it passed a set of tax cuts a few years back. Those cuts might not have been such a problem, except that one of the lasting effects of the pandemic was inflation. It hit a high near 10% in 2022, and while it’s come down from that peak, it's still higher than it was prior to 2020. What’s the connection between inflation and the deficit? It’s more indirect, but it may be the government's biggest problem at this point. The Federal Reserve's primary strategy in fighting inflation is to raise interest rates, and that's exactly what it did beginning in 2022. That helped with inflation but became a problem for the deficit because the government is such a large borrower, and higher interest rates translated to higher borrowing costs. Unfortunately, the issue has now started to compound on itself. Despite the Fed’s lowering rates, which it has done a handful of times over the past few years, market interest rates have remained stubbornly high, especially long-term rates. That’s because the government is being forced to pay more to borrow, just like any prospective borrower whose finances look shaky. This has become something of a chicken-or-the-egg problem. If rates were lower, the deficit might shrink considerably. But rates may not drop until investors see that lawmakers have gotten serious about the issue.  Why hasn’t Congress addressed the problem? In short, it’s because the two most obvious solutions—raising taxes or cutting spending—are the last thing any politician wants to do. Ironically, this may be the one area where both parties are fully aligned. Hopefully Washington begins to get serious about the problem. For better or worse, though, this is the situation we’re in. Against this backdrop, what steps might you consider for your portfolio? Because the deficit is so closely tied to interest rates, the first area I’d focus on would be your bond holdings. With long-term interest rates at multi-decade highs, there might appear to be an opportunity to profit from long-term bonds if rates were to drop. I would be cautious, though. Just this week, we’ve seen volatility in long-term rates, and things could easily go the other way. For that reason, I recommend a conservative posture toward bonds, with the majority in short-term holdings, only a small amount in intermediate-term and none at all in long-term bonds. To be sure, this might mean forgoing some profits if rates come down, but in my view, the bond side of a portfolio should be the part that helps investors sleep at night rather than another area to worry about. What other steps could you take? I’d give thought to your long-term tax exposure. It’s possible that politicians will eventually get serious and raise taxes, and if they do, you’d want to be in a position to manage your own tax bill. Fortunately, there is one clear route to inoculating part of your portfolio against tax increases, and that’s to look for ways to build up dollars in a Roth account: If you’re in your working years, you could contribute to a Roth IRA or a Roth 401(k). Your employer might even allow for so-called mega back-door Roth contributions. If you’re retired or happen to have a low-income year, consider a Roth conversion.  A final recommendation: If you have a net worth over $10 million or so, you might give thought to estate tax strategies. Today the federal estate tax applies only to individuals with more than $15 million in assets, but this threshold has been a political football and could easily end up much lower. As recently as 2008, it was at just $2 million. Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

New in 2025 – Code Y on 1099-R box 7 for QCD’s

"Here is a link to the 2026 draft 1099-R instructions dated Jun 17, 2026 wherein the IRS writes, on a preliminary basis, the following - ...unexpected issues occasionally arise, or legislation is passed—in this case, we will post a new draft of the form to alert users that changes were made to the previously posted draft... Code Y for box 7a on Form 1099-R. We added code “Y” to the list of codes for box 7a to identify a qualified charitable distribution (QCD). See Qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), later. For tax year 2026, the use of code Y to report a QCD is optional. If you are completing and filing a 2026 Form 1099-R, you may choose, but are not required, to enter code Y in box 7a. It is difficult to provide timely, clear and objective guidance when the agency who interprets the laws passed by congress and writes the detailed regulations have not finalized their rules for the tax year we are more than halfway through. My intent in this updated post was to encourage using a direct from IRA custodian to charity method for those who are making qualified distributions to avoid potential tax compliance headache for you and your tax preparer. I do not have any idea if your broker will choose to use code "Y" regardless of the method of how the QCD is distributed."
- William Perry
Read more »

Americans and their credit cards

"
I agree that"we are common sense people" that are a minority. But I disagree with your statement"we are not blessed". Knowing that ALL that we have ARE Blessings helps me to stay appreciative every day for our finances, our health, our family, and our accumulated stuff. For all of it, we thank God
"
- L H
Read more »

How Did You Find Paid Work After Retiring from Your Primary Career?

"Good question. I truly believe everyone and there journeys are different. After 33 years of commission route sales and the hectic pace and hours that went along with it I knew I didn't want to sit around or start a similar rat race in retirement. Living in a smaller town it's all about connections, everybody knows someone so it's fairly easy to find a job. A lot of it is not what you know but who you know. I retired for three days 😂 before starting to work at our Middle School as a teachers aide. After almost fifteen years of that I retired again. I have now worked seasonally for the last eight years in our city's Parks department, enjoying the outdoors at a much slower pace along with no pressure of any kind"
- L H
Read more »

You Heel!

"I fear a lot of those small repair guys are in their death knells (those that haven't already succumbed). It's not good for the repair, recycle in the interests of the planet but as goods have got cheaper (and less durable) the consumer incentive is heavily skewed toward dispose and replace. Plus vicious cycle is less work , higher piece rate to make rent/profit - means less likely to be viable to new customers."
- bbbobbins
Read more »

Beyond Bank Accounts

I OPENED MY FIRST bank account in the US at a local credit union (CU) close to my workplace. The CU had several convenient offers for employees of our company. With minimal effort, I opened checking and savings accounts, got free checkbooks and a credit card despite having no credit history in the US.

I was so pleased with the convenience that I handled all my banking needs through this CU for many years. That included direct deposit of my salary, payments and withdrawals, a car loan, and certificates of deposit (CDs) as my savings grew. I still maintain my checking account here and occasionally enjoy special favors as a longtime loyal customer.

Eventually, I realized that I earned very little interest from the bank deposits. I shopped around, found other banks with better rates, opened several accounts here and there, and moved my money around.

I felt good about being proactive and getting a better return on my cash reserve. But that feeling was short-lived as I started learning more about personal finance and investments. Tired of chasing yields in bank accounts, I eventually embraced US Treasurys (debt issued and backed by the US Government) as my alternative to savings accounts and CDs.

For those unfamiliar with US Treasurys, think of them as CDs with maturities ranging from four weeks to 30 years. They're widely used as a "safe investment" by individual, institutional and even sovereign investors around the world.

There are some key differences, though. Bank deposits are insured only up to $250,000. US Treasurys, on the other hand, are backed by the full faith and credit of the US Government. Therefore, there is virtually no default risk regardless of the investment amount.

Treasury interest rates, both short-term and long-term, are heavily influenced by monetary policy actions of the US Federal Reserve (Fed). Treasury interest rates directly affect many interest rates we encounter in everyday life: bank accounts, CDs, mortgage, car loans, personal and business loans, and so on.

Treasury interest rates are often higher than comparable bank products. Why? Because the intermediary financial institutions take their cut for operational costs and profits. Result? Suboptimal, or sometimes almost non-existent, interest on bank deposits.

But wait. What if I need my money back?

With bank deposits, I can walk in and withdraw cash from my account. If my money is locked in a CD, I may have to pay a penalty for early withdrawal, but I can still access it fairly quickly. What happens if I'm holding Treasurys? Do I need to wait until maturity?

That leads us to another important aspect of US Treasurys: their extremely high liquidity.

I can certainly buy newly issued Treasurys and wait until maturity, but I don't have to wait for these events. Investors around the world buy and sell Treasurys in the open market every day, making them one of the most liquid investments in existence.

Their liquidity, safety and meaningful return make Treasurys a compelling alternative for both short- and long-term cash reserves.

Sounds interesting? That's exactly how I felt after doing my own research. All I needed to figure out was the best way to invest in them.

Instead of buying Treasurys directly from the US Treasury, I use my brokerage accounts and buy and sell individual Treasurys or Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the open market, just like stocks or funds. (I used to participate in Treasury auctions through the brokerage account to buy new issues and set my holdings to auto-roll upon maturity, but I eventually stopped doing that to keep things simple.)

For annual expenses and short-term cash needs, I like short-term, highly liquid, Treasury ETFs with a practically negligible expense ratio.

For money expected in three to four years, I favor short- and intermediate-term Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) ETFs. TIPS have a lower interest rate compared to equivalent regular Treasurys, but their principal is adjusted with inflation, helping mitigate the risk of unexpected inflation.

For cash reserves further into the future, five years or more, my preference is a ladder of individual TIPS bonds, each maturing in a specific future year. Bond trading is slightly more involved than ETFs or stocks, so target-maturity TIPS ETFs can also be a reasonable alternative despite their slightly higher management fees.

Is there a catch compared to keeping money in conventional bank accounts?

I can't think of any, but there are two noticeable differences worth understanding.

First, unlike money sitting in bank accounts, Treasury investments fluctuate in value because they constantly change hands in open markets. For short-term Treasurys, the fluctuations are usually tiny. For intermediate- and long-term Treasurys, the swing can be more noticeable, especially when there's a major change in the interest rate expectation. Thankfully, these fluctuations are usually modest, and over time Treasurys often come out ahead compared to bank deposits.

The second difference deserves a bit more attention.

With a bank account, you can get hold of your money almost immediately. Treasury investments, however, may take a couple of business days to turn into spendable cash. You need to sell the ETF or bond during market hours. Once the transaction settles, usually the next business day, the proceeds can then be transferred out to the checking account for spending. In some cases, you may be able to carry on your spending activities directly from the brokerage account.

Over time, I shifted most of my liquid savings to Treasurys because of the improved result. Yet I still see many people leaving large cash balances in bank products or chasing yields from one bank to another.

I suspect the main reason is simple: lack of familiarity with US Treasurys.

  Sanjib Saha retired early from software engineering to dedicate more time to family and friends, pursue personal development and assist others as a money wellness mentor. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is the president and cofounder of Dollar Mentor, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization offering free investment and financial education. Follow his nonprofit on LinkedIn, and check out Sanjib’s earlier articles.
Read more »

Reaching Two-thirds of a Century!

"Rick, Happy 67th. I've enjoyed your articles over the years and appreciate your volunteerism with tax aid program. Best of luck in making it to the century mark."
- Blue Collar RE
Read more »

The Intentional Spendthrift

"When Jonathan planned to move to Philadelphia, he reached out to me because it was my hometown. One of the things he grew to love was the plethora of BYO restaurants in the city and surrounding areas. Many are Italian, but there is a nice mix of other types, as well as a range of prices. We used to trade BYO recommendations. I miss that."
- Rick Connor
Read more »

TreasuryDirect changing login procedure to mandate ID.me later in 2026

"In the county I live in there recently has been just two smaller local financial institutions who still redeemed US government paper savings bonds. Both financial institutions (one a bank with a state charter, one a credit union) has limited that service strictly for their own account holders whose banking accounts are with long term customers with active accounts. With all of the changes currently occurring at Treasury Direct my expectation is the number of financial institutions redeeming old paper savings bonds for customers will soon be zero. Over the counter sales of paper savings bonds ended in 2012 and the purchase of paper savings Bonds using overpayment of taxes (which next to no one did) ended in 2025. If you own paper US Bonds you are likely doing your heirs a favor by redeeming them sooner rather than later."
- William Perry
Read more »

Tax Complications – How SS Benefits interact with Other Income

"Hung, You are welcome. I have become a big fan of Dinkytown's 1040 calculator for quick estimates. I believe that AARP's calculator is based on Dinkytown's also. The calculations in the original post can be completed in a few minutes."
- Rick Connor
Read more »

Feeling TIPSy?

NOT TOO LONG ago, Treasury Inflation Protected Security (TIPS) was a relatively obscure investment for safe long-term fixed-income investments. For the first twenty years of the new century, consumer prices were mostly stable or rising at a too-slow-to-notice rate. Why bother with anything related to inflation? Sadly, persistently low inflation made us complacent on the biggest long-term risk of bond investments -- the insidious unexpected inflation that robs us of the purchasing power of our “safe” investments. Yes, let’s not forget that the biggest risk of bond or bond-like investments is unexpected inflation. Any bond or CD with a maturity beyond a few years must either offer a sufficiently high interest rate to compensate for sudden bouts of inflation, or have its principal adjusted for the inflation actually realized. The former is nearly impossible to find without sacrificing safety. The latter is what TIPS is for. To be clear, the market and investors always expect some level of inflation. Therefore, a bond’s effective interest rate - measured by its YTM (Yield to Maturity) - must be high enough to not only compensate for “expected” inflation and the uncertainties around it but also provide a meaningful increase in the purchasing power of the original principal.  A concrete example might help. Consider a 10-year US Treasury nominal bond with a face value of $1,000, selling at $1,000 and paying 5% annual interest. The interest rate reflects the expectations about inflation and other factors over the next 10 years. The rate would be lower if market expected lower inflation, and higher if market expected the opposite. The omnipresence of inflation means we’re likely to lose some purchasing power when we get our $1,000 in 10 years. It won’t buy what $1,000 buys today. By how much? That’s the thousand dollars question (pun intended).  There isn’t a readily available number that explains why that 10-year Treasury Bond yields 5% instead of 3% or 7%. Investors essentially take a leap of faith that annual inflation stays low enough over the 10-year period for the interim interests to compensate for the purchasing power loss, plus some changes. Most of us are perfectly comfortable assuming that inflation won’t be as high as 5% for 10 years. But are we fooling ourselves? I suggest using an inflation calculator to see for ourselves. Spoiler alert: Late 1960s through early 1980s can be an eye-opening period. How’d we feel if the next 10 years turn out to be something similar? Think about how you might feel when you safekeep your money in a so-called secure investment, give up higher returns available from risky investments, and then encounter an inflationary regime. Your minimum expectation was that your purchasing power would remain intact and perhaps improve a little by the time your bond matures. Instead, unforeseen inflation erodes your purchasing power and compromises the financial goal the fund was supposed to cover.  Your “safe” investment fails you completely. You realize that it wasn’t safe at all.  If unexpected inflation is so devastating, why are we so lax about it?  I can think of two reasons.  First, our minds haven’t adapted to the reality that, unlike to a “real” asset like a bag of rice or a gallon of gasoline, money in its current form is inherently self-eroding. It slowly loses its worth over time. A hundred dollars sitting around will still be a hundred dollars next year, but it won’t buy the same amount. We don’t intuitively perceive the continuous loss of purchasing power. Even when we do internalize it with some effort, we get used to the “pace” of the loss. In other words, we view inflation as steady and unexpected inflation as highly unlikely. Alas, all it takes is a single prolonged inflationary period to change that perception. By then, however, the damage to existing fixed income investments may already be done. Frankly, I’d be very wary of keeping my long-term “safe” money -- fund that I need to preserve beyond a three-year horizon - in any form that isn’t protected against unexpected inflation. For bond investments, the most meaningful option would be TIPS. Why? Because, in addition to being secured by the full faith and credit of the US Government just like any other Treasury securities, TIPS provides three important assurances upfront. First, it provides protection against unexpected inflation, which is a realized inflation that differs from what we expected when purchasing it. If the actual inflation averages 12% instead of the expected 2%, the principal is automatically adjusted to reflect the actual inflation. No guesswork or unexpected risk involved. Second, it provides a “real interest rate” upfront that tells us how much the purchasing power of the investment will increase over time, regardless of what the actual inflation turns out to be. Buying a 10-year TIPS with real 2% annual interest means the investment’s purchasing power will grow 2% per year over the holding period, before considering taxes and other factors. The third aspect is more nuanced. It involves the possibility of inflation being lower than expected, or even negative inflation (aka deflation). Let me elaborate. If a regular nominal 10-year Treasury Bond offers 5% annual yield and an equivalent TIPS offers a real annual interest rate of 2.75%, the market-implied inflation, the breakeven inflation rate, is roughly 2.25% (5% minus 2.75%). Actual inflation, of course, will be known only after 10 years when the bond matures. Suppose the actual inflation turns out to be only 1.25%. The nominal Bond investor would end up with more purchasing power than the TIPS investor because the TIPS principle would be adjusted by only the actual 1.25% inflation rate.  The primary objective of the TIPS investor would still have been met: preserving and improving purchasing power by about 2.75% annually. But there would be a “missed opportunity”. The nominal Treasury investor would end up with even greater purchasing power. Does it mean that a TIPS investor can face an unlimited opportunity cost if inflation turns out to be negative? What happens if the actual inflation is, hypothetically speaking, negative 5%, in a severely deflationary period? Does the TIPS investor get back proportionately reduced principal at maturity? Thanks to the third assurance of TIPS, the answer is NO.  TIPS guarantees that the principal returned at maturity will never fall below the original face value. During periods of deflation, the inflation-adjusted principal can fall below its face value and the interim interest payments will decline accordingly. But at maturity, the principal is floored at the original principal amount. Therefore, the breakeven inflation rate, the difference between the yield of a nominal Treasury bond and the real yield of an equivalent TIPS, represents the maximum annual yield advantage that the nominal bond can have over TIPS in an unexpectedly low inflation regime.  To summarize, a TIPS investor gets unlimited protection against unexpectedly high inflation, while accepting a limited opportunity cost should the actual inflation be low or even negative. The magnitude of that trade-off is reflected in the breakeven inflation rate at the time of the TIPS purchase.  An aside: given the destructive impact of deflation on economy and society, policy makers are generally more concerned about preventing prolonged deflation than about preventing modest inflation. Therefore, prolonged deflation is usually considered less likely. Still, we cannot ignore deflation risk altogether and should be prepared for the possibility that TIPS can underperform a nominal bond if inflation runs low.  Therefore, the decision to favor TIPS over an equivalent nominal Bond hinges in part on the current breakeven inflation rate. If it’s low enough, favoring TIPS can be an easy decision. Getting unlimited protection against unexpectedly high inflation is worth accepting the relatively small opportunity cost if inflation comes below the breakeven rate. There is, however, a cautionary note about buying TIPS bonds in the secondary market, especially older issues. Consider a 30-year TIPS bond issued 20 years ago and a 10-year TIPS issued within last 6 months. Both might appear to be valid choices if they mature within a few months of each other and offer similar yields. But beneath the surface, one may be more favorable than the other.  The older TIPS will likely have a much higher inflation-adjusted principal because it accumulated 20 years of inflation adjustments. But the protection against unexpected deflation applies only to the bond’s original face value, which is typically $1,000.  In a prolonged deflationary period, the older bond has much more room for its inflation-adjusted principal to decline before reaching the $1,000 floor. The newer issue, whose adjusted principal is much closer to the $1,000 face value, has less exposure to this risk. Therefore, all else being equal, I’d favor a TIPS with a low inflation-adjusted factor when buying in the secondary market. All things considered, my vote goes to TIPS for long-term “safe” investments, provided the break-even inflation is reasonably low. For secondary market purchases, however, a high inflation-adjustment factor would give me pause.   Sanjib Saha retired early from software engineering to dedicate more time to family and friends, pursue personal development and assist others as a money wellness mentor. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is the president and cofounder of Dollar Mentor, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization offering free investment and financial education. Follow his nonprofit on LinkedIn, and check out Sanjib’s earlier articles.
Read more »

$40 Trillion of Debt

SOME MILESTONES are auspicious. Others are not. This week, the Treasury announced that the federal government’s debt had topped $40 trillion for the first time. Government debt is nothing new, but the problem is now of more concern, for two reasons. First, the scale has grown. An apples-to-apples way to look at the government’s debt load is to compare it to GDP—the economy’s total annual output. On this basis, outstanding debt now exceeds 100% of GDP, a level we haven’t seen since the period immediately after World War II. That brings us to the second concern: If the government isn’t able to balance its books while the economy is strong, as it is today, lawmakers will have less flexibility to act when the next recession occurs. For a brief period about five years ago, a theory known as modern monetary policy entered the conversation. The idea, popularized by a book titled The Deficit Myth, was that we shouldn’t be so concerned with deficits—that the U.S. government should be able to borrow more or less as much as it wants. What we’ve seen, though, is that eventually deficits do matter. In simple terms, the government now takes in about $6 trillion per year in revenue, but it's spending almost $8 trillion, resulting in deficits of roughly $2 trillion. And just like a consumer who's run up a big credit card bill, interest payments now consume an ever-larger portion of annual spending. In round numbers, the government this year will spend about one in every six tax dollars it collects on interest and will spend more on interest than on defense. Why have the numbers gotten so much worse? The first factor was Covid. The government had to take extraordinary measures to pull the economy out of recession. But while that spending was mostly justified, the problem is that Congress grew accustomed to larger budget shortfalls and has been unwilling to rein things back in. Congress, in fact, went in the opposite direction when it passed a set of tax cuts a few years back. Those cuts might not have been such a problem, except that one of the lasting effects of the pandemic was inflation. It hit a high near 10% in 2022, and while it’s come down from that peak, it's still higher than it was prior to 2020. What’s the connection between inflation and the deficit? It’s more indirect, but it may be the government's biggest problem at this point. The Federal Reserve's primary strategy in fighting inflation is to raise interest rates, and that's exactly what it did beginning in 2022. That helped with inflation but became a problem for the deficit because the government is such a large borrower, and higher interest rates translated to higher borrowing costs. Unfortunately, the issue has now started to compound on itself. Despite the Fed’s lowering rates, which it has done a handful of times over the past few years, market interest rates have remained stubbornly high, especially long-term rates. That’s because the government is being forced to pay more to borrow, just like any prospective borrower whose finances look shaky. This has become something of a chicken-or-the-egg problem. If rates were lower, the deficit might shrink considerably. But rates may not drop until investors see that lawmakers have gotten serious about the issue.  Why hasn’t Congress addressed the problem? In short, it’s because the two most obvious solutions—raising taxes or cutting spending—are the last thing any politician wants to do. Ironically, this may be the one area where both parties are fully aligned. Hopefully Washington begins to get serious about the problem. For better or worse, though, this is the situation we’re in. Against this backdrop, what steps might you consider for your portfolio? Because the deficit is so closely tied to interest rates, the first area I’d focus on would be your bond holdings. With long-term interest rates at multi-decade highs, there might appear to be an opportunity to profit from long-term bonds if rates were to drop. I would be cautious, though. Just this week, we’ve seen volatility in long-term rates, and things could easily go the other way. For that reason, I recommend a conservative posture toward bonds, with the majority in short-term holdings, only a small amount in intermediate-term and none at all in long-term bonds. To be sure, this might mean forgoing some profits if rates come down, but in my view, the bond side of a portfolio should be the part that helps investors sleep at night rather than another area to worry about. What other steps could you take? I’d give thought to your long-term tax exposure. It’s possible that politicians will eventually get serious and raise taxes, and if they do, you’d want to be in a position to manage your own tax bill. Fortunately, there is one clear route to inoculating part of your portfolio against tax increases, and that’s to look for ways to build up dollars in a Roth account: If you’re in your working years, you could contribute to a Roth IRA or a Roth 401(k). Your employer might even allow for so-called mega back-door Roth contributions. If you’re retired or happen to have a low-income year, consider a Roth conversion.  A final recommendation: If you have a net worth over $10 million or so, you might give thought to estate tax strategies. Today the federal estate tax applies only to individuals with more than $15 million in assets, but this threshold has been a political football and could easily end up much lower. As recently as 2008, it was at just $2 million. Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 69: WE CAN’T control whether stocks rise or fall, but we can ensure we pocket whatever the market delivers—by diversifying broadly, holding down investment costs and minimizing taxes.

humans

NO. 15: JUST BECAUSE folks appear rich doesn't mean they are. The big house may be heavily mortgaged, the luxury sedans could be leased, the landscaper might be awaiting payment—and the couple who appear to have it all may be agonizing over how to pay the bills. Make no mistake: Those who put on a display of wealth are less wealthy as a result.

Truths

NO. 119: OUR CHANCES of dying are 100%—so the insurance component of permanent life insurance, which is intended to be held until death, is costlier than that of term insurance, which provides coverage for maybe 20 or 30 years. Permanent insurance also involves high commissions, plus you’re required to pay into an investment account.

think

EASTERLIN PARADOX. Within a society, those with higher incomes tend to say they’re happier, observed economist Richard Easterlin in 1974—and yet, as the society’s income climbs over time, overall happiness doesn’t increase. For instance, the U.S. standard of living has more than doubled over the past four decades, but happiness hasn’t budged.

Two-minute checkup

Manifesto

NO. 69: WE CAN’T control whether stocks rise or fall, but we can ensure we pocket whatever the market delivers—by diversifying broadly, holding down investment costs and minimizing taxes.

Spotlight: Happiness

Happiness at Home

I HAVE READ THAT spending on experiences brings more happiness than spending on things. But what about the experience of buying? Can that make us happy?
I’ve lived in my small community for 21 years. Over that time, my regular buying habits have led me to discover people who provide me with excellent service. They also supply me with a generous measure of genuine satisfaction.
Every third Friday, I sit and listen to a great raconteur as he cuts my hair.

Read more »

Slowing the Clock

THE FIRST TIME I remember realizing that “time flies” was during my senior year of high school. One of my class periods each day involved working in the school’s main office. My primary duty was to walk the hallways, gathering attendance sheets from each classroom.
It was a highly repetitive task, each day a replica of the prior one, with the route through the hallways never changing. On one of those days, I recall thinking,

Read more »

Prosperity

I never thought about becoming ultra rich. I just wanted enough money to feel financially secure and not have to think about stretching every dollar. I reached my goal, but found that the most important thing money can provide is personal freedom. However, earning or having a lot of money is not liberating to everyone.
it’s all too easy for us to fall into the trap of spending too little money. Once we have worked hard or smart for many years to create income,

Read more »

Getting to Happy

THE MEGA MILLIONS drawing on Friday was worth more than $1 billion. Would you be happy if you’d been the lucky winner?
Last week, I talked about the Vanderbilts. Once the wealthiest family in America, they saw their fortune dwindle because of aggressive spending. Back in the 1890s, for example, the family spent $7 million building the Breakers, a summer home in Newport, Rhode Island. That’s the equivalent of $220 million today. When it was completed,

Read more »

Let’s Get Happy

AMERICA’S HAPPINESS plunged during the pandemic. I’d assumed that survey result was an aberration, and perhaps that’ll still prove to be the case. But recovery sure hasn’t come quickly.
There was no General Social Survey in 2020, when COVID-19 struck. But the following year’s survey found that just 19% of Americans described themselves as very happy—the lowest reading since the survey was first conducted in 1972. The “very happy” group rose to 25% in 2022,

Read more »

Best of Jonathan’s HumbleDollar Posts

WE LOST A brilliant mind and generous writer, Jonathan Clements, whose words guided thousands on life, finance, and happiness. Even as he faced the unimaginable, he continued sharing wisdom with clarity, humor, and humanity.
I wanted to take some time and dig into Jonathan’s earliest posts on HumbleDollar. Posts that even the most loyal readers may not have read. With that, I also summarized some main takeaways and learnings that can help us all better navigate our own complex lives.

Read more »

Spotlight: Wilhelm

Don’t Discount Luck

Ben Carlson's column today is titled "The Ovarian Lottery". Where and when you were born has a whole lot to do with how your life turns out. You could be capable of becoming a great artist, but if you were born female for most of human history you wouldn't be able to reach your potential. Born a serf in medieval Europe? You were going to stay a serf. Sure, hard work helps, but if your particular talent isn't in demand, it only helps so much.  Just ask the North Carolina furniture and textile workers laid off after NAFTA. He also has a quote from Nick Maggiulli: "If you had invested from 1960-1980 and beaten the market by 5% each year, you would have made less money than if you had invested from 1980-2000 and underperformed the market by 5% a year. Sometimes, when you start investing can be more important than anything else". When you start drawing down also matters, of course. I got lucky: I was born to a middle class family in England right after WWII. That meant adequate food, excellent (free) education and good (free) medical care, plus getting into the tech business when it was just taking off. Being born in, say, North Korea at the same time would have been a very different story.
Read more »

Getting an Earful

I DON’T REMEMBER when my hearing started deteriorating. I suppose it came on gradually. I definitely remember when I developed tinnitus—ringing in the ears—and it was tinnitus that sent me to an audiologist in 2012. She confirmed the information I’d already found on the internet: There’s no cure for tinnitus. While I would always miss the complete silence I’d previously enjoyed, at least mine was a tolerable background hum, unlike some horror stories I’d read. After running the usual battery of tests, the audiologist told me something I didn't know: I have reverse slope hearing loss. This rare condition means that I don't hear low frequencies well. My high-frequency hearing, which is what often diminishes as you age, was still pretty good. This made sense. A little research told me that people with this kind of hearing loss—affecting maybe 3,000 total in the U.S. and Canada—are often tone-deaf, and I have always been hopelessly tone-deaf. It also explained why I used to keep cranking up the bass on stereo speakers. My research turned up some more facts—annoying ones. Medicare will pay for hearing tests and eye exams once every 12 months. But if the tests say you need hearing aids or glasses, it won't pay a dime toward the cost. My retiree supplemental insurance would pay $200, but that was a fraction of the likely cost. Audiologists and the hearing-aid manufacturers turned out to have a cozy relationship that allowed them to keep prices high. If I wanted hearing aids, I had to buy them from an audiologist. I decided to wait a year and get them from a university medical center. I wound up buying mid-range Phonaks for $4,000, but they were never very satisfactory. If the audiologist programmed them to where I could hear speech well, my voice…
Read more »

Mr. Quinn would be nervous. Would you be?

Towards the bottom of Mr. Quinn's lengthy thread on spreadsheets and budgets I mentioned that I expect to spend a bit under 1% of my portfolio this year. Dick said that he would feel nervous in that situation. I am not currently feeling nervous, but since that percentage will increase over time, maybe I should be. I thought I would ask my fellow contributors what they thought. Some background: I agree with Dick in seeing my income as just Social Security, with COLA, and a company pension, with no COLA. In fact, the pension was frozen when I reached 30 years service in 2000, and has lost value ever since. I expect my SS to overtake it in a couple of years. It's true, that at almost 78 I have been taking RMDs for several years, and the IRS considers that to be income, but since, after QCDs, I simply move the funds from my IRA to my brokerage account, I don't. Equally, the interest and dividends in my brokerage account are on automatic reinvestment. As I expect my medical costs to increase above the rate of inflation, and the monthly fees for my CCRC will probably do the same, I will need more than 1% from my portfolio in future years. I should mention that the portfolio exists solely to make up for the lack of a COLA on my pension. Leaving a legacy would be nice, but as I have no biological children it is not a priority.  If I take the current value of my portfolio (which has increased since the last time I looked), subtract a guesstimate $50,000 for what will likely be my last car and divide by 22 (years to 100), the result is 11.5% lower than my annual SS plus pension, before taxes.…
Read more »

My Magic Wand

ONE REASON I WAITED so long to sell my house was my extreme reluctance to move all my belongings. I didn't want to deal with the hassles involved—because I’d gone through that less than a decade earlier. In 2013, I had the house renovated. I replaced almost all the flooring, with hardwood downstairs, carpet upstairs and tile in the bathrooms. I also updated the kitchen cabinets. That meant, of course, that every single thing in the house had to be moved. I got rid of a few boxes of books. But otherwise, I still had the same amount of stuff in 2022 that I had in 2013. Meanwhile, in 2019, I put down a deposit on a one-bedroom apartment at a local continuing care retirement community, or CCRC. In 2020, I was able to switch to a two-bedroom apartment in a new building, with completion scheduled for some time in 2023. I was finally going to have to move—and to downsize. Fortunately, there wouldn’t be too much downsizing involved. I would move from a 1,520-square-foot, three-bedroom, two-and-a-half bath house to a 1,660-square-foot, two-bedroom, two-bath apartment with den at the CCRC. I could keep my main bedroom, study and living room unchanged. The upshot: All I’d need to do is donate the furniture in my home’s spare bedroom, the dining table and chairs, and the dinette set in the kitchen. For the apartment, I’d buy a new dining set and put it in the den. With an eye to simplifying the move to the CCRC, I decided to sell my house in 2022 and move temporarily to an apartment, while I waited for the CCRC apartment to be ready. There was a fairly new complex near my house, with elevators and a parking garage, where I could rent a two-bedroom, two-bath…
Read more »

Some people are never satisfied

The Washington Post has an article on yet another effort to cut taxes for the wealthy. This time it is stepping up the cost basis for capital gains to account for inflation. You'd think they'd at least wait for the dust to settle from the recent give away. I don't know whether the article is behind the pay wall, it's not giving me an option to share it so I did a straight copy.
Read more »

What would you do if you couldn’t drive?

A more realistic title would be “when”, not “if”. It doesn't take much, especially if you're over 65: a broken bone, a joint replacement, failing eyesight, a stroke or heart attack, dementia. If you have a partner, and rely on the partner for transport, the same problems apply. My mother, born in 1906, spent over 90 years living in England without ever learning to drive. There are a few cities in the US where that's possible – New York, Chicago, San Francisco, for instance – but in most of the country you need a car. There was a grocery store “near” the house I lived in before moving to a Continuing Care Retirement Community, but it would have been a three mile round trip to the other side of a major four lane road. No-one wants to do that, pushing a shopping cart and a cooler, during a North Carolina summer, with temps and humidity consistently in the nineties. Nothing else I might need was even that close. Consider two of my friends. One, let's call her C, is my next-door neighbor at the CCRC. After she had joint-replacement surgery she came back to the Skilled Nursing facility, and then to her apartment. Meals were delivered, and her on-site physical therapist took her down for treatments in a wheelchair. The CCRC also provides transport to off-site medical appointments. Then there is my friend M, still aging in place. When she had joint-replacement surgery she constructed a massive spreadsheet to track all of the people coming to look after her, provide physical therapy, and take her to appointments. That's a lot of effort, with plenty of opportunity for things to go wrong. Which would you rather be? (BTW, M is moving to a facility with Independent and Assisted Living in January.)
Read more »