FREE NEWSLETTER

Welcome to the place where money grows up.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Forget the 4% rule.

"A few years ago I concluded I was under withdrawing. I begin with the RMD calculations but shifted to a modified guardrails approach. I evaluated just about every approach Christine Benz writes about at Morningstar. I ran a few scenarios and decided the MGA was best for me.  I have both traditional and Roth IRAs. My largest single annual withdrawal was 10% of the total value of these accounts. However, these accounts recovered and currently indicate a peak value. That’s been generally true on December 31 of each year. Because of circumstances we haven’t spent all of our withdrawal in recent years. That’s likely to be so in 2026. We are fortunate and don’t have to exercise caution with our spending. We’ve increased our charitable giving and G is currently on the east coast caring for an elderly relative. We have no concerns about the cost of her trips, which number 3-4 each year.  I’ll probably take a larger withdrawal this year. It is really more about tax management at this point. I’m allowing our taxed accounts to increase in value although I want to avoid going up a bracket with withdrawals. I have no intention of taking additional withdrawals from the Roth IRA in the foreseeable future."
- normr60189
Read more »

When Luck Rises, Be Ready to Dig

"One of my favorite Jimmy Buffett-isms, "yesterday is over my shoulder, so I can't look back for too long...""
- Dan Smith
Read more »

My Favorite Rx

"LOL, Linda, wine is a great chaser for chill pills. "
- Dan Smith
Read more »

America Doesn’t Just Do Layoffs. It’s Fallen in Love With Them

"From personal experience layoffs are a tricky subject and there’s a great deal of nuance. For the largest of companies that have 10s of thousands of employees there can be many factors which drive layoffs. Whether it be economic conditions, change in direction of the company, management or mismanagement, or simply pleasing Wall Street! For many reasons the process for performing layoffs may seem sterile but unfortunately from an HR and business security perspective it has to be. Many employees for large companies receive very generous severance packages. For small companies there is little incentive to let people go, they are our number one resource. It can take a long time and financial resources to replace the employees further down the line. But circumstances outside of the business’ control can make layoffs a necessary evil in order to keep the doors open. I work in the architecture and engineering field. In July 2008 it was announced that I would manage our local office of about 50 employees starting January 1, 2009. In July 2008 business was booming, and we couldn’t hire someone if we tried. September 15 Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy. By January 1, 2009, I inherited an office with a rapidly declining book of business as clients cancelled projects. We were a satellite office and also navigating the proclamations received from ‘mothership’. On the personal side of things my was wife was laid off while I was simultaneously planning a business future with fewer employees. Without doubt this was the hardest time of my career. Not because of the long hours spent trying to keep the business viable but because letting people go was so emotional and stressful. I knew everyone personally and knew the impact this would have on their families / personal life. The list of those to be let go changed 3-4 times a day as I sweated the details and consulted with senior colleagues. If skillsets were similar, what if one employee has two young children and mortgage and another a single person who rented an apartment? Is there a right answer? There were many other factors to account for. I still lose sleep over the day when the layoffs were made and unfortunately had to repeat the process in January 2010. The plan for our office was to avoid the weekly lay-off scenario. We also wanted to reassure retained employees that all things being equal we had a plan for the rest of the year. We watched from afar the weekly torture in other parts of the company. From a purely $ numbers perspective being ahead of the curve actually saved jobs long term. When I received calls from mothership to cut more people, I simply declined, indicating that our business was in equilibrium and we were not the problem! I fully expected to be locked out of my computer the next day. Even though we carefully prepared with HR and tried to be as humane as possible during the lay-off process, I am sure the only thing the affected employees heard was the fact they no longer had a job. Severance packages, COBRA, resources we would make available to find new employment, in one ear out the other. Understandably so. HR demanded that e-mail be shut down. We negotiated the ability for employees to retrieve personal information from computers and to copy information that would help them to update their resumes/portfolios, under supervision, and allowed the affected employees to come back at a different time, after hours if they desired. While I am still happy working part-time, I am so glad I don’t have to deal with this aspect of business anymore. One size doesn’t fit all."
- Grant Clifford
Read more »

Retirement in America is not a pretty picture…and not getting better.

"Yet there are HD Forum posts active right now that speak of layoffs, the state of retirement in America, and the influence of luck (or lack of same). There are times when it's not because of a choice, but rather situations with outcomes that negatively impact random folks. As has been said here on HD before, we exist in rarified air. For the most part we've grabbed the brass ring and are reaping the benefits. Everyone else (90%? 95%?) is breaking even or struggling. In times like these I like to think of the Golden Rule and wish it was more uniformly applied."
- Jeff Bond
Read more »

What happens to Medicare Supplement coverage when moving to a different state?

"Very helpful, James. I took everyone's advice and looked up Boomer Benefits, and I am impressed."
- Carl C Trovall
Read more »

Medicaid Asset Protection Trusts (MAPTs)

"My parent did pay for a portion of his care- all of his monthly income including SS, Pension and RMD paid for his care, before Medicaid paid their portion to the NH. We were only utilizing government benefits to the extent allowed by the program. In my parent's case, his monthly obligation probably paid for about 75% of the actual NH billing. The SNT allowed us to provide additional resources to my parent such as a private room and additional agency help. I don't feel you should necessarily judge the use of a government program without fully knowing the details of the family situation- each one is quite different."
- Bill C
Read more »

Tax Smart Retirement

A POPULAR JOKE about retirement is that it can be hard work. That’s because financial planning is like a jigsaw puzzle, and retirement often means rearranging the pieces. In the past, I’ve discussed two key pieces of that puzzle: how to determine a sustainable portfolio withdrawal rate and how to decide on an effective asset allocation. But there’s one more piece of the puzzle to contend with: taxes. Especially if you’re planning to retire on the earlier side, it’s important to have a tax plan. When it comes to tax planning for retirement, there’s one key principle I see as most important, and that’s the idea that in retirement, the goal is to minimize your total lifetime tax bill. That’s important because a fundamental shift occurs the day that retirement arrives: In contrast to our working years, when taxes are, to a large degree, out of our control, in retirement, taxes are much more within our control. By choosing which investments to sell and which accounts to withdraw from, retirees have the ability to dial their income—and thus their tax rate—up or down in any given year. The challenge, though, is that tax planning can be like the game Whac-A-Mole. Choose a low-tax strategy in one year, and that might cause taxes to run higher in a future year. That’s why—dull as the topic might seem—careful tax planning is important. To get started, I recommend this three-part formula: Step 1 The first step is to arrange your assets for tax-efficiency. This is often referred to as “asset location.” Here’s an example: Suppose you’ve decided on an asset allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. That might be a sensible mix, but that doesn't mean every one of your accounts needs to be invested according to that same 60/40 mix. Instead, to help manage the growth of your pre-tax accounts, and thus the size of future required minimum distributions, pre-tax accounts should be invested as conservatively as possible. On the other hand, if you have Roth assets, you’d want those invested as aggressively as possible. Your taxable assets might carry an allocation that’s somewhere in between. If you can make this change without incurring a tax bill, it’s something I’d do even before you enter retirement. Step 2 How can you avoid the Whac-A-Mole problem referenced above? If you’re approaching retirement, a key goal is to target a specific tax bracket. Then structure things so your taxable income falls into that same bracket more or less every year. By smoothing out your income in this way from year to year, the goal is to avoid ever falling into a very high tax bracket. To determine what tax rate to target, I suggest this process: Look ahead to a year in your late-70s, when your income will include both Social Security and required minimum distributions from your pre-tax retirement accounts. Estimate what your income might be in that future year and see what marginal tax bracket that income would translate to. In doing this exercise, don’t forget other potential income sources. That might include part-time work, a pension, an annuity or a rental property. And if you have significant taxable investment accounts, be sure to include interest from bonds. Then, for simplicity, subtract the standard deduction to estimate your future taxable income. Suppose that totaled up to $175,000. Using this year’s tax brackets, that would put your income in either the 24% marginal bracket (for single taxpayers) or 22% (married filing jointly). You would then use this as your target tax bracket. Step 3 With your target tax bracket in hand, the next step would be to make an income plan for each year. The idea here is to identify which accounts you’ll withdraw from to meet your household spending needs while also adhering to your target tax bracket. This isn’t something you’d map out more than one year in advance. Instead, it’s an exercise you’d repeat at the beginning of each year, using that year’s numbers. What might this look like in practice? Suppose you’re age 65, retired and not yet collecting Social Security. In this case, your income—and thus your tax bracket—might be quite low. To get started, you’d want to withdraw enough from your tax-deferred accounts to meet your spending needs but without exceeding your target tax bracket. This would then bring you to a decision. If you’ve taken enough out of your tax-deferred accounts to meet your spending needs and still haven’t hit your target tax rate, then the next step would be to distribute an additional amount from your pre-tax accounts. But with this additional amount, you’d complete a Roth conversion, moving those dollars into a Roth IRA to grow tax-free from that point forward. How much should you convert? The answer here involves a little bit of judgment but is mostly straightforward: You’d convert just enough to bring your marginal tax bracket up into the target range. Some people prefer to go all the way to the top of their target bracket, while others prefer to back off a bit. The most important thing is just to get into the right neighborhood. What if, on the other hand, you’ve taken enough from your pre-tax accounts to reach your target tax rate, but that still isn’t enough to meet your spending needs? In that case, you wouldn’t take any more from your pre-tax accounts, and you wouldn’t complete any Roth conversions. Instead, you’d turn to your taxable accounts, where the applicable tax brackets will almost certainly be lower. Capital gains brackets currently top out at just 20%. Thus, for the remainder of your spending needs, the most tax-efficient source of funds will be your taxable account. What if you aren’t yet age 59½? Would that upend a plan like this? A common misconception is that withdrawals from pre-tax accounts entail a punitive 10% penalty. While that’s true, it isn’t always true, and there’s more than one way around it. One exception allows withdrawals from a workplace retirement plan like a 401(k) as long as you leave that employer at age 55 or later. In that case, as long as you don’t roll over the account to an IRA, you’d be free to take withdrawals without penalty. If you’re retiring before age 55, you’ll want to learn about Rule 72(t). This allows for withdrawals from pre-tax accounts at any age, as long as you agree to what the IRS refers to as substantially equal periodic payments (SEPP) from your pre-tax assets. The SEPP approach definitely carries restrictions, but if you’re pursuing early retirement, and the bulk of your assets are in pre-tax accounts, this might be just the right solution.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Well That’s A Bummer!

"I doubt I will be doing a manual backcheck to validate the findings, I wouldn't finish before my funeral! I guess I could duplicate the on a different AI platform but will that be any more accurate, and if different which one is correct? During the back testing process I did have Gemini provide tables showing values for each of the 20 years, balance for stocks and bonds, % growth, number of transactions, days between transactions etc. Big picture nothing looked out if line and the activity expected during the GFC, Covid, 2022 seemed to be aligned. I did observe that AI was making assumptions, for example in one scenario the bonds dropped to $250k to buy stocks during the GFC drawdown, hence the additional prompts and guard rails put in place in subsequent scenarios. As the prompts became more restrictive the end balances reduced. There were some scenarios which had higher returns but also had higher risk. The results seemed proportionate. On the drone counts. Professionally the company I work for has been using technology to count vehicles from CCTV and LiDAR backed with AI to track passenger volumes, movements and throughput at ticketing/security in airports. These products work very well and are reliable......... assuming reliable products were being used it must have been the large group of stoned visitors 😊☘️🍺"
- Grant Clifford
Read more »

Guardianship

"Ed, I hope so too, for your sake. It has been awful. We are hoping the worst is over. She will lose money on her house, since she only bought it 2 years ago, before we knew things were as bad as they were. Luckily Spouse and brother were able to intervene before she lost all her money like her sister did. C"
- baldscreen
Read more »

What, Me Worry?

"I just read an article which reports the results of a survey conducted in July 2025 of older adults fear of retirement income. The study found the following, “Aside from Social Security, the only area where a majority of respondents believe (governmental) policy is likely to lead to severe changes in their lifestyle is inflation.”"
- David Lancaster
Read more »

Forget the 4% rule.

"A few years ago I concluded I was under withdrawing. I begin with the RMD calculations but shifted to a modified guardrails approach. I evaluated just about every approach Christine Benz writes about at Morningstar. I ran a few scenarios and decided the MGA was best for me.  I have both traditional and Roth IRAs. My largest single annual withdrawal was 10% of the total value of these accounts. However, these accounts recovered and currently indicate a peak value. That’s been generally true on December 31 of each year. Because of circumstances we haven’t spent all of our withdrawal in recent years. That’s likely to be so in 2026. We are fortunate and don’t have to exercise caution with our spending. We’ve increased our charitable giving and G is currently on the east coast caring for an elderly relative. We have no concerns about the cost of her trips, which number 3-4 each year.  I’ll probably take a larger withdrawal this year. It is really more about tax management at this point. I’m allowing our taxed accounts to increase in value although I want to avoid going up a bracket with withdrawals. I have no intention of taking additional withdrawals from the Roth IRA in the foreseeable future."
- normr60189
Read more »

When Luck Rises, Be Ready to Dig

"One of my favorite Jimmy Buffett-isms, "yesterday is over my shoulder, so I can't look back for too long...""
- Dan Smith
Read more »

My Favorite Rx

"LOL, Linda, wine is a great chaser for chill pills. "
- Dan Smith
Read more »

America Doesn’t Just Do Layoffs. It’s Fallen in Love With Them

"From personal experience layoffs are a tricky subject and there’s a great deal of nuance. For the largest of companies that have 10s of thousands of employees there can be many factors which drive layoffs. Whether it be economic conditions, change in direction of the company, management or mismanagement, or simply pleasing Wall Street! For many reasons the process for performing layoffs may seem sterile but unfortunately from an HR and business security perspective it has to be. Many employees for large companies receive very generous severance packages. For small companies there is little incentive to let people go, they are our number one resource. It can take a long time and financial resources to replace the employees further down the line. But circumstances outside of the business’ control can make layoffs a necessary evil in order to keep the doors open. I work in the architecture and engineering field. In July 2008 it was announced that I would manage our local office of about 50 employees starting January 1, 2009. In July 2008 business was booming, and we couldn’t hire someone if we tried. September 15 Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy. By January 1, 2009, I inherited an office with a rapidly declining book of business as clients cancelled projects. We were a satellite office and also navigating the proclamations received from ‘mothership’. On the personal side of things my was wife was laid off while I was simultaneously planning a business future with fewer employees. Without doubt this was the hardest time of my career. Not because of the long hours spent trying to keep the business viable but because letting people go was so emotional and stressful. I knew everyone personally and knew the impact this would have on their families / personal life. The list of those to be let go changed 3-4 times a day as I sweated the details and consulted with senior colleagues. If skillsets were similar, what if one employee has two young children and mortgage and another a single person who rented an apartment? Is there a right answer? There were many other factors to account for. I still lose sleep over the day when the layoffs were made and unfortunately had to repeat the process in January 2010. The plan for our office was to avoid the weekly lay-off scenario. We also wanted to reassure retained employees that all things being equal we had a plan for the rest of the year. We watched from afar the weekly torture in other parts of the company. From a purely $ numbers perspective being ahead of the curve actually saved jobs long term. When I received calls from mothership to cut more people, I simply declined, indicating that our business was in equilibrium and we were not the problem! I fully expected to be locked out of my computer the next day. Even though we carefully prepared with HR and tried to be as humane as possible during the lay-off process, I am sure the only thing the affected employees heard was the fact they no longer had a job. Severance packages, COBRA, resources we would make available to find new employment, in one ear out the other. Understandably so. HR demanded that e-mail be shut down. We negotiated the ability for employees to retrieve personal information from computers and to copy information that would help them to update their resumes/portfolios, under supervision, and allowed the affected employees to come back at a different time, after hours if they desired. While I am still happy working part-time, I am so glad I don’t have to deal with this aspect of business anymore. One size doesn’t fit all."
- Grant Clifford
Read more »

Retirement in America is not a pretty picture…and not getting better.

"Yet there are HD Forum posts active right now that speak of layoffs, the state of retirement in America, and the influence of luck (or lack of same). There are times when it's not because of a choice, but rather situations with outcomes that negatively impact random folks. As has been said here on HD before, we exist in rarified air. For the most part we've grabbed the brass ring and are reaping the benefits. Everyone else (90%? 95%?) is breaking even or struggling. In times like these I like to think of the Golden Rule and wish it was more uniformly applied."
- Jeff Bond
Read more »

What happens to Medicare Supplement coverage when moving to a different state?

"Very helpful, James. I took everyone's advice and looked up Boomer Benefits, and I am impressed."
- Carl C Trovall
Read more »

Medicaid Asset Protection Trusts (MAPTs)

"My parent did pay for a portion of his care- all of his monthly income including SS, Pension and RMD paid for his care, before Medicaid paid their portion to the NH. We were only utilizing government benefits to the extent allowed by the program. In my parent's case, his monthly obligation probably paid for about 75% of the actual NH billing. The SNT allowed us to provide additional resources to my parent such as a private room and additional agency help. I don't feel you should necessarily judge the use of a government program without fully knowing the details of the family situation- each one is quite different."
- Bill C
Read more »

Tax Smart Retirement

A POPULAR JOKE about retirement is that it can be hard work. That’s because financial planning is like a jigsaw puzzle, and retirement often means rearranging the pieces. In the past, I’ve discussed two key pieces of that puzzle: how to determine a sustainable portfolio withdrawal rate and how to decide on an effective asset allocation. But there’s one more piece of the puzzle to contend with: taxes. Especially if you’re planning to retire on the earlier side, it’s important to have a tax plan. When it comes to tax planning for retirement, there’s one key principle I see as most important, and that’s the idea that in retirement, the goal is to minimize your total lifetime tax bill. That’s important because a fundamental shift occurs the day that retirement arrives: In contrast to our working years, when taxes are, to a large degree, out of our control, in retirement, taxes are much more within our control. By choosing which investments to sell and which accounts to withdraw from, retirees have the ability to dial their income—and thus their tax rate—up or down in any given year. The challenge, though, is that tax planning can be like the game Whac-A-Mole. Choose a low-tax strategy in one year, and that might cause taxes to run higher in a future year. That’s why—dull as the topic might seem—careful tax planning is important. To get started, I recommend this three-part formula: Step 1 The first step is to arrange your assets for tax-efficiency. This is often referred to as “asset location.” Here’s an example: Suppose you’ve decided on an asset allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. That might be a sensible mix, but that doesn't mean every one of your accounts needs to be invested according to that same 60/40 mix. Instead, to help manage the growth of your pre-tax accounts, and thus the size of future required minimum distributions, pre-tax accounts should be invested as conservatively as possible. On the other hand, if you have Roth assets, you’d want those invested as aggressively as possible. Your taxable assets might carry an allocation that’s somewhere in between. If you can make this change without incurring a tax bill, it’s something I’d do even before you enter retirement. Step 2 How can you avoid the Whac-A-Mole problem referenced above? If you’re approaching retirement, a key goal is to target a specific tax bracket. Then structure things so your taxable income falls into that same bracket more or less every year. By smoothing out your income in this way from year to year, the goal is to avoid ever falling into a very high tax bracket. To determine what tax rate to target, I suggest this process: Look ahead to a year in your late-70s, when your income will include both Social Security and required minimum distributions from your pre-tax retirement accounts. Estimate what your income might be in that future year and see what marginal tax bracket that income would translate to. In doing this exercise, don’t forget other potential income sources. That might include part-time work, a pension, an annuity or a rental property. And if you have significant taxable investment accounts, be sure to include interest from bonds. Then, for simplicity, subtract the standard deduction to estimate your future taxable income. Suppose that totaled up to $175,000. Using this year’s tax brackets, that would put your income in either the 24% marginal bracket (for single taxpayers) or 22% (married filing jointly). You would then use this as your target tax bracket. Step 3 With your target tax bracket in hand, the next step would be to make an income plan for each year. The idea here is to identify which accounts you’ll withdraw from to meet your household spending needs while also adhering to your target tax bracket. This isn’t something you’d map out more than one year in advance. Instead, it’s an exercise you’d repeat at the beginning of each year, using that year’s numbers. What might this look like in practice? Suppose you’re age 65, retired and not yet collecting Social Security. In this case, your income—and thus your tax bracket—might be quite low. To get started, you’d want to withdraw enough from your tax-deferred accounts to meet your spending needs but without exceeding your target tax bracket. This would then bring you to a decision. If you’ve taken enough out of your tax-deferred accounts to meet your spending needs and still haven’t hit your target tax rate, then the next step would be to distribute an additional amount from your pre-tax accounts. But with this additional amount, you’d complete a Roth conversion, moving those dollars into a Roth IRA to grow tax-free from that point forward. How much should you convert? The answer here involves a little bit of judgment but is mostly straightforward: You’d convert just enough to bring your marginal tax bracket up into the target range. Some people prefer to go all the way to the top of their target bracket, while others prefer to back off a bit. The most important thing is just to get into the right neighborhood. What if, on the other hand, you’ve taken enough from your pre-tax accounts to reach your target tax rate, but that still isn’t enough to meet your spending needs? In that case, you wouldn’t take any more from your pre-tax accounts, and you wouldn’t complete any Roth conversions. Instead, you’d turn to your taxable accounts, where the applicable tax brackets will almost certainly be lower. Capital gains brackets currently top out at just 20%. Thus, for the remainder of your spending needs, the most tax-efficient source of funds will be your taxable account. What if you aren’t yet age 59½? Would that upend a plan like this? A common misconception is that withdrawals from pre-tax accounts entail a punitive 10% penalty. While that’s true, it isn’t always true, and there’s more than one way around it. One exception allows withdrawals from a workplace retirement plan like a 401(k) as long as you leave that employer at age 55 or later. In that case, as long as you don’t roll over the account to an IRA, you’d be free to take withdrawals without penalty. If you’re retiring before age 55, you’ll want to learn about Rule 72(t). This allows for withdrawals from pre-tax accounts at any age, as long as you agree to what the IRS refers to as substantially equal periodic payments (SEPP) from your pre-tax assets. The SEPP approach definitely carries restrictions, but if you’re pursuing early retirement, and the bulk of your assets are in pre-tax accounts, this might be just the right solution.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 23: IF WE DON’T have much money, we should compensate with time—by starting to save when we’re young, holding stocks for decades and encouraging our children to do the same.

Truths

NO. 10: WALL STREET always strives to look its best. To ensure mutual fund expenses and advisory fees appear small, they’re expressed as a percent of the dollars we invest, not as a percent of our likely gain. To make their results appear more impressive, money managers pick their benchmark indexes carefully and use cumulative return “mountain” charts.

think

LONGEVITY RISK. Spending down a retirement portfolio is tricky: You don’t know how long you will live—and hence there’s a risk you’ll run out of money before you run out of breath. To fend off that risk, limit annual portfolio withdrawals to 4% or 5%, delay Social Security to get a larger check and consider an immediate annuity that pays lifetime income.

act

ROUND UP the mortgage check. If you’re paying $1,512 a month, send the mortgage company $1,600 instead. It’s a painless way to increase savings, the extra $88 a month could allow you to pay off your mortgage years earlier and you’ll earn a pretax return equal to your mortgage’s interest rate. That return could be higher than you can get with high-quality bonds.

Homes

Manifesto

NO. 23: IF WE DON’T have much money, we should compensate with time—by starting to save when we’re young, holding stocks for decades and encouraging our children to do the same.

Spotlight: In Retirement

It’s The Little Things That Scare Me Now

I’m going to be 74 next month, and I’m beginning to realize that the little things in life are starting to frighten me more. If I were younger, they probably never would have crossed my mind.
When I walk, I’m constantly scanning the ground for hazards. A raised sidewalk or uneven pavement could send me tumbling—and at my age, I’m not sure my bones would hold up to the fall.
Every night before I lie down,

Read more »

Going It Alone

When Rachel and I got married, I was already in my 60s. After our wedding, my sister said to Rachel, “You take good care of my brother.” My cousin Barb told her husband, Kent, “I don’t know what would have happened to Dennis if he had never met Rachel.”
I got the impression they didn’t think I could take care of myself in retirement — that it would be too difficult to go it alone. I get it.

Read more »

Retirement as you like it

Here I sit on my deck, the blue sky is cloudless. It is 74 degrees, no wind and quiet except for the birds making their views known. My view of anything beyond 50 feet is blocked by thickly leaved trees.  
Between writing, I read commentary about tariffs, trade, economies on Project-Syndicate, a daily updated compilation of articles from scores of international writers. I’m also reading about the Salem witch trials and Ben Franklin’s rise to fame and testimony before Parliament about taxing the colonies –

Read more »

Staying Alive

“Don’t ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive, and go do it. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive.” — Howard Thurman
When I last checked in with you we were waiting to move to California to be closer to our, now, 18-month granddaughter. I shared the wisdom I had gotten from a six-day silent retreat. As Paul Harvey used to say, “now for the rest of the story”.

Read more »

Another interesting article on Social Security claiming

A recent article by Michael Finke in Think Advisor discusses some anecdotal evidence he has been hearing about recent trends in SS claiming. Worry about a reduction in benefits apparently is leading some retirees to claim their benefits earlier than might be expected given their wealth.  I have to admit that this year’s discussions around SS funding and administration have given me pause.
Two things about the article. It was published in a professional journal targeting financial  advisors.

Read more »

Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs

Released:
A SUMMARY OF THE 2025 ANNUAL REPORTS
Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees
“Based on our best estimates, this year’s reports show that……
The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund will be able to pay 100 percent of total scheduled benefits until 2033, unchanged from last year’s report. At that time, the fund’s reserves will become depleted and continuing program income will be sufficient to pay 77 percent of total scheduled benefits……”
“As in prior years,

Read more »

Spotlight: Quinn

What Motivates Me

MY FATHER WAS AGE 19 and my mother was 11 when the Great Depression started. They were married in 1942 and I was born in late 1943. Their view of money matters was surely tempered by their life experience. They had no investments to speak of and always kept what little money they had in a checking account. They would never borrow and didn’t know what a credit card was. Many years ago, I convinced my mother to buy 75 shares of the company I worked for—a large utility. The investment at the time was less than $2,000. But I could never convince her to enroll in the dividend reinvestment plan. She wanted her cash each quarter. When she died at age 87, I inherited those 75 shares and promptly added them to my dividend reinvestment plan. My parents’ sole income in retirement was Social Security. They had what they needed, but not much more. Witnessing their experience could impact a child in one of two ways, I suspect: Repeat their mistakes or head in the opposite direction. I chose the latter route. In the late 1970s, when I was around 35, my wife and I went to a financial planner, who turned out to be more of a salesman. He asked me my financial goals. I told him I wanted a vacation home on Cape Cod and to pay for my four children's college. He thought for a moment and didn’t say much, but his manner and the look on his face made it clear he was tempted to laugh in my face. It seemed I couldn’t afford anything, except to die. That ticked me off and, as you now know, I never forgot that meeting. The motivation from that meeting, a company where I worked for 49 years, a…
Read more »

Why the Long Face?

AS I READ ARTICLES and comments on HumbleDollar, I see concerns about taxes, Medicare, Social Security, health care costs, college, inflation, investing—and the anxiety caused by the complexity of it all. I also see very different views on what’s earned and deserved. In some ways, it’s about what we consider fair. I suspect the HumbleDollar community is more aware and more involved in their overall financial life than the majority of Americans, but nevertheless generally representative. If we step back and consider our collective views on money and all that goes with it, have we lost our perspective? Do we realize how good we have it? Even our poor are comparatively fortunate. If you earn $50 a day, or about $13,100 per year, you’re in the world’s top 20% for income. The average household income in the world is $12,235, while the median (or typical) per-capita household income is $2,920. Americans have more stuff and larger homes than citizens of just about any other country. There are 300,000 items in the average American home, or so says an article in the Los Angeles Times. The average size of U.S. homes has nearly doubled since the 1950s, according to National Public Radio. It’s still not large enough for many. A quarter of people with two-car garages say they don’t have room to park cars inside them, and 32% only have room for one vehicle, according to the Department of Energy. No wonder one out of every 10 Americans rents offsite storage—the fastest growing segment of the commercial real estate industry over the past four decades, reports The New York Times. A Bloomberg article reveals that, when surveyed, even wealthy people—those with incomes in the top 10% of tax filers—say they’re poor. These are people earning at least $175,000 a year. A quarter of…
Read more »

Aiming for Less

WHAT DOES IT MEAN to “live within your means”? To answer the question, we first need to define “means.” If your gross income is $60,000, that income isn’t your means. For starters, you need to subtract income and payroll taxes. To live within your means, you need to spend no more than your net income—income after taxes and other withholdings. I’ll go further and suggest that your true means are your income net of monthly savings for retirement and financial emergencies. Some people do even better. They live below their means, meaning they save extra—denying themselves spending that many others happily embrace. Living below your means isn’t about deprivation or sacrificing all enjoyment. Rather, it’s about making a conscious decision to prioritize financial security. If you’re already saving enough to meet long-term and short-term goals, living far below your means strikes me as unnecessary, even punitive. I’m not a fan of super-frugality. Living prudently is about managing your finances responsibly and making choices that align with your income. The key words here are “align with your income.” Living within your means is easier as your income rises, and yet many higher-income folks fail to do so. Where you live is a factor, too. I live in the third highest income-tax state, one that also has the nation’s highest property taxes. The average property tax in our town is $17,206, and our bill is $13,600. One result: Our monthly fixed costs are $4,193. These expenses include property taxes, homeowners’ association fees, and all insurance and utility bills. They don’t include the cost of groceries, gasoline, clothing, personal care services, gifts, eating out or car maintenance. It also doesn’t include any expenses related to our vacation home. While some say they live comfortably in retirement on $50,000 a year, it costs us…
Read more »

Get the Point

I’M A DEADBEAT. That’s what companies call people who pay off their credit cards in full every month and hence don’t incur interest. But I’m more than that. I’m a leverager. I leverage points and stars and credits everywhere I go. Let me count the ways. When I go to the gas station, I use my American Express card and my Exxon rewards card. I get credits from Exxon for buying the gas, which I apply to future gas purchases, plus I get triple points on my Amex card for the gas purchase, which I then use to pay my Amex bill. My Starbucks membership earns me stars for my next latte and lots of other stuff, too. It also garners me free coffee on my birthday. What a deal. Back in February, I used stars to buy a package of sopressata and cheese to add to my Super Bowl sandwich. My bank credit card gives me airline miles. I have enough miles for two round-trip first class tickets to anywhere. I haven’t flown that airline in years, but I’m going to use those miles. I can also use those miles to buy all kinds of other stuff. I took a cruise, and they gave me 50,000 extra miles and $200 to spend on the ship. On top of that, I earned more miles by using the card to pay for the cruise. Got that? Yeah, it’s complicated. My hotel club card gets me a free bottle of water—whoopee—but it also got me four free nights at a hotel in London. Needless to say, as I accumulate points on the hotel card, I also get miles or points on the credit card. Talk about compounding. I just checked my balance. I’m thinking about a few free nights in Paris. Then…
Read more »

Poor Judgment

MANY AMERICANS SEEM to think of themselves as poor—even though they don’t come close to meeting the official definition. Let’s start with some objective measures. One standard official measure says that, for 2019, a two-person household is in poverty with annual income of $16,910 or less. According to an MIT calculator, a two-adult household in Calhoun County, Alabama, needs to earn at least $8.54 per hour each—with both working fulltime—to support themselves. In Bergen County, New Jersey, that hourly rate jumps to $11.43. Who is in poverty? The least likely are families headed by married couples, at 4.9%, and the most likely are single women with children, at 25.7%. Single-father families are in the middle, at 12.4%. As you might suspect, the highest poverty rates are among the least educated: 24.5% of those who never graduated high school are in poverty, nearly double the rate for folks with a high school diploma. Poverty is also high among those with disabilities. Overall, 12.3% of Americans are officially in poverty. But suppose we get away from objective measures—and look at what folks say about themselves. A variety of surveys suggest that 40% to 75% of Americans view themselves as living paycheck to paycheck or say they would struggle financially if they were faced with an unexpected expense of as little as $400. But here’s the thing with surveys: They rely on individual perceptions. Consider this from the Pew Research Center: “The vast majority of Americans—95%—now own a cellphone of some kind. The share of Americans that own smartphones is now 77%, up from just 35% in Pew Research Center’s first survey of smartphone ownership conducted in 2011.” If as many as 75% of Americans are truly living paycheck to paycheck, why are 77% still springing for a smartphone? Who are the 20 million who visit Disney’s Magic Kingdom every year? Why are so…
Read more »

You’re on Your Own

A WRITER RECENTLY asked my opinion of gig economy jobs and how they could benefit retirees looking for extra income. I looked up the term to be sure my understanding was correct. It was—except we used to call the jobs “temporaries,” “part-time,” “project work” or “consulting.” As I told the writer, a gig economy job sounds pretty good for us retirees who want to keep active or supplement our income, especially if it doesn’t involve being a crossing guard. But I’m not sure the whole gig thing is great for younger workers. I realize I’m a dinosaur when it comes to the workplace and my work experience has long been buried beneath the remains of the last Ice Age. Still, right or wrong, society must come to grips with the employment changes it’s wrought. Gig work has helped sever the old relationship between employer and worker. Gigs provide flexibility, but they also place far greater responsibility on the individual. Gig economy workers need constantly to find new work, while also planning and taking action to safeguard their financial future, including retirement. My experience could hardly be more different: I worked for the same company from 1961 to 2010. I have a pension and 401(k) plan. I have retiree life insurance and health insurance. In 2019, finding such a job is virtually impossible, except perhaps in the public sector. In fact, such jobs don’t even exist at my former employer. Companies have all but abandoned pensions and benefits that encourage long-term employment. At the same time, it’s near impossible to find workers who want to spend most of their life at one company. Given what you now know about me, it’s no shock to learn that my retirement planning was minimal, because that’s all that was required. I checked the progress…
Read more »