Would you like a pension? So why are you so against immediate-fixed annuities?
NO. 77: TO BUY ourselves happiness, often the best strategy is to not buy anything at all. That can leave us with a plump bank account and the sense of financial security it offers.
NO. 51: WE FAVOR the familiar, such as stocks of local companies and makers of goods we buy. This “home bias” can be risky. Folks often bet big on their employer’s shares, so both their paycheck and portfolio hinge on the company’s prosperity. Many U.S. investors also shun foreign stocks, even though there’s no guarantee U.S. shares will outperform long-term.
NO. 87: A LONG LIFE is a big risk. On average, 65-year-olds live until their mid-80s. But that’s the average—and half of all 65-year-olds will live longer. How can you cope with this longevity risk, especially given the threat from inflation? Your financial arsenal might include stocks, delayed Social Security benefits, and immediate and deferred income annuities.
RISK POOLING. When we purchase health, life, auto and other insurance, we contribute to a pool of money overseen by an insurance company. Those who crash their car or suffer ill-health collect from the pool. Those who get through the year unscathed pay their premiums and get nothing in return—which is what you want, because it means life is good.
NO. 77: TO BUY ourselves happiness, often the best strategy is to not buy anything at all. That can leave us with a plump bank account and the sense of financial security it offers.
WHEN I RETIRED, I WAS surprised by how many of my friends and former colleagues had a financial advisor. My thought: Why would folks pay someone else to manage their money when they could easily do it themselves?
But I found out early in retirement that hiring an advisor was a good idea. There’s a big difference between investing while drawing a paycheck and investing without one. When I retired, I realized that the money I was investing was all the money I’d ever have,
I’LL NEVER FORGET MY first interaction with Wall Street. I was in my early 20s and just getting started in my career, when I was introduced to a stockbroker—let’s call him Eddie. He was a pleasant fellow with a good reputation and all the trappings of success, including a DeLorean in the driveway. He seemed like a safe choice.
My interactions with Eddie were straightforward. He would call from time to time with stock ideas.
WE RECENTLY UPGRADED our home with smart locks, which open with a keypad code or cellphone command. After a bunch of research, we settled on Yale Assure Locks, which I’d also seen on an episode of This Old House. I’ve installed many locksets in the past, so I didn’t expect any problems.
Once they arrived, I gathered my tools, opened the packages and read the instructions. It seemed pretty straightforward. I set to work on the deadbolt,
I’VE SEEN FINANCIAL advisors do great work and I’ve seen them do poor work. Which brings me to my late father’s experience.
Dad was a heck of a small businessman. Starting in 1956, he and his partner sold and serviced radios, televisions, appliances and furniture. Forty years later, he sold the business to four of my brothers.
By the mid-1960s, Dad had accumulated what was for him a small fortune. This was the time of the stock market’s so-called go-go years.
MY BIGGEST INITIAL mistake as a financial planner: underestimating the power of emotions. My office is located near top universities such as Harvard, MIT and Boston University. I assumed my well-educated clients, many with strong quantitative backgrounds, were simply looking to me for additional analytical insights.
Instead, my clients proved to be as human as everybody else. One top academic statistician, who claimed to be frugal and cautious, shared with me an annuity policy he purchased from a close friend at his church.
MY FATHER-IN-LAW William retired from Duke University after teaching there for more than 30 years. He had a good pension, which—along with Social Security—covered all his expenses at the continuing care retirement community (CCRC) where he spent most of his retirement. Almost to the end, he was mentally sharp. I saw no need to inquire about his finances. I was mistaken.
In summer 2014, my wife noticed that William, then age 96, had left a large check for a matured life insurance policy on his desk for a couple of months.
RDQ Sorry folks, I still see annuities, including deferred annuities, as a viable option for creating steady retirement income.
I want to see less of me on the internet
Top Five Expense Categories and Inflation Factor
Staying Alive by Jonathan Clements
Building Connections by Marjorie Kondrack
TCJA – what to keep, what to toss
Let’s Be Adults by Jonathan Clements
Forfeiture laws vs. Tax laws
Times Like These
Take a Chance?
Richard Quinn | Sep 8, 2021
IS THERE AN EASY way to solve our financial problems? I doubt it, but that doesn’t stop people from trying. Initial public offerings, cryptocurrencies and hot stock tips come to mind. But they seem insignificant in popularity compared to lotteries.
My state currently offers 11 different draw lotteries and 63 scratch-off games. Several cost between $10 and $30 each to play. I consider lotteries an insidious tax, mostly on Americans who can’t afford it.
According to a 2018 Bankrate study, households in the lowest income bracket—those earning under $30,000—spent 13% of their annual income on lottery tickets. The highest earners, by contrast, devoted just 1% of their annual household income to playing the lottery.
Long-run investing has a much surer chance of paying off than do scratch-offs from the corner store. Yet people are so poor at probability that they believe a winning ticket may fall into their hands. One survey found 59% of millennials said winning a lottery jackpot is a reasonable way to fund retirement. Pure fantasy. The odds of winning the top Powerball prize are 1 in 292,201,338. The chance of being attacked by a shark is far greater, at 1 in 3,700,000 for Americans living near oceans.
The chance of winning a fortune from a scratch-off game is remote as well. Many of these games run for years. You could buy a scratch-off ticket not knowing that the top prize was awarded years before. Still, 60% to 70% of the $70 billion spent on state lotteries in 2014 was for scratch-off tickets.
Not that I’m entirely rational about all of this. I used to buy one ticket a week in three different games. Since then, I stopped playing all but one game, whose top prize rarely exceeds $5 million. For two bucks a week, I can dream.
Three bucket strategy for financing retirement
Taxing Situations