FREE NEWSLETTER

The one thing better than harvesting tax losses is having no losses to harvest.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Getting Older

"Thanks everyone for all of your wonderful comments and ideas. You've provided plenty of great advice on how to better grow old. It doesn't sound all that bad after all. And some of these ideas were even tangentially related to financial matters 😉"
- Doug C
Read more »

Carrying Humble Dollar Forward

"Same for me, Andrew. I struggle to think of things to write about that haven't been addressed by other writers, so, I just lurk and respond."
- Dave Melick
Read more »

Perfection, enemy of good

"I think your plan is an excellent launch pad for most people. As I look back, I have benefited from making 401k contributions every two weeks since 1994. Not through some great financial wisdom, it just seemed like a good idea to get the company match (free money) when I started. I set it and mostly forgot it. With the exception of over time increasing contributions with pay raises until I was able to max out the contribution limit. For many years the quarterly paper statement received in the mail was my only window into progress being made and I didn't pay attention to the stock market. Simple. Back then I did not understand the complexities of investing and the potential pitfalls. It is only over the last 5-6 years that I have sought to better educate myself. In retrospect I am sure that I would have been much better off today if low-cost index funds had been available as a choice in my 401K, fortunately I wasn't paying outrageous fees either. Over the past 2-3 years, I have been trying to give some financial advice to my now 30-year-old daughter. At first some suggested reading and websites, to no avail, and some gentle prompts to let me look under the hood of her finances. Eventually, when the time was right for her, she did allow me to take a look under the hood. Unfortunately, I found credit card debt (for which she was making minimum payments) and while she did have a 401k retirement plan, its balance was meagre and she was not saving enough to take full advantage of the company match. Today she has a simple plan:
  1. Credit Card Debt is gone and several cards cancelled
  2. She is automatically saving 10% to her 401K each pay-check
  3. She is invested 100% in a low-cost Target Date Fund
I consider this a major achievement! When I saw the title of your article for some reason it made me think of an interview with Bono from U2 discussing the bands success and longevity. He said, in reference to selecting songs for an album, "good is the enemy of great". That might be the case for a rock band but not necessarily for personal investing / retirement planning."
- Grant Clifford
Read more »

Recency Bias (or: You’re Running Buggy Software)

"I agree that recency bias is important. The “news” can be equally detrimental to our financial plans. I should restate that and say I think we should be very selective about our information sources. I prefer written ones, but AI “slop” is making it even more difficult to get a grasp on reality.  With all of the negativity, what’s the reality for my accounts? I’m using data as of 4/7/2026.  I would hope that HD readers are “long term” investors. By that I mean investing with the intention to hold for 10-15 years.  I do use a long-term approach and it has worked for me. Of course, there are short-term ups, and downs. For example, I own a TIPS fund and even with dividends the current value shows a “loss” of 2.96%. But that fund is only 1.92% of my portfolio ( I prefer to hold bonds). The real decline to the portfolio is 0.058%. That miniscule amount is hardly worth thinking about.  I think it is useful to define investment gyrations as declines or increases. After all, there is no loss incurred (or gain) until one sells and cashes out.  Anything purchased recently may show a short-term decline in value. If we think long-term, it is reasonable to assume there will be an increase in the future. Certain, more volatile stocks or investments may not behave with the overall stock market. That’s the nature of speculation.  My point is, even a 50/50 portfolio can do very well, long term. Mine has. However, I’m retired and so I am prudently more conservative and practice wealth defense. This would not be my approach if I were more than 10 years from retirement.   My portfolio currently shows an increase in value of 0.4% since 12/31/2025. It shows an increase of 10.25% since 12/31/2024. The increase would be greater if I didn’t take RMDs, and if I hadn’t withdrawn 10% in 2023. The S&P 500 shows a recent decline of about 2.6%.  Certain investments have been helpful to me. My Gold and Precious Metals fund shows a recent decline in value, although it is up about 130%. A utility I purchased in 2014 is up 400%. My energy ETF is up about 250%. There are 15 holdings which have more than doubled in value.  Even the S&P 500 shows a 5-year gain of 62%, excluding dividends.  If, after analyzing your portfolio you find it to be too volatile or subject to larger declines recently, let’s say greater than 10%, then perhaps you should re-evaluate your approach. However, if you are young, you may have decades of investing ahead  If the market perturbation is disturbing, take a look at your net worth. With recent real estate value increases many of us have seen an increase in our net worth, even if we fully depreciate automobiles, etc. In my case, because I have not spent all of my annual RMDs, the remainder goes into savings. That too has improved my net worth.  "
- normr60189
Read more »

Blood Money

"Here's a podcast episode on the topic, from Ed Slott & Jeffrey Levine: https://open.spotify.com/episode/0C0CfDdTmFKsR07DBLkuJu?si=2PpP8uw1SJW45ijpYlSJxQ"
- Randy Dobkin
Read more »

Financial regrets about parenthood?

"That would indeed be a terrific article idea, Kristine, especially since financial planning for elder care is top of mind for many still-working couples. My own household is a dream situation for an elderly person. Mama (my MIL) is the center of attention for both her daughters and her son-in-law. Even the dog listens to her."
- Mike Gaynes
Read more »

Any concern?

"I’m near retirement and all set with the portfolio AA initial conditions, specifically with a healthy dose of fixed income ready to weather an inevitable market downturn. What I’m a bit unsure of is refilling my fixed income efficiently &!sufficiently as time goes on. I have the usual plan of rebalancing and its nuances, but we’ll see how it goes. I’m fairly confident, have read a ton and run the numbers but haven’t done this before. Retirement: There’s always that first time ;)."
- Andy Morrison
Read more »

Tax Efficiency

TAX EFFICIENT FUND placement is an often underrated topic. The goal of the tax efficient fund placement is to minimize taxes within your investments, and select the right account for those investments.

But how much does that actually matter?

Vanguard’s research finds that a thoughtful asset location strategy can add significantly more value than an equal location strategy. The value added typically ranges from 5 to 30 basis points of after-tax return, depending on circumstances (e.g., income, portfolio size).

Investors generally have access to different account types, including:

  • Tax-free accounts (Roth IRA, Roth 401(k))
  • Taxable brokerage accounts
  • Tax-deferred accounts (401(k), 403(b), Traditional IRA)

If you are an employee that may not have access to a retirement plan, you could perhaps consider a Solo 401(k) if you have "side hustle" business income.

Generally, if your investments are all in tax-deferred or tax-free accounts, fund placement will not make a huge difference for you. That is because these accounts already come with tax efficiency.

If that's your case, two things become important though:

1. Consideration between pre-tax, like Traditional 401(k) or after-tax account, like Roth 401(k). Put simply, this decision generally comes down to your marginal tax rate now versus marginal tax rate in the future (which isn't something easy to predict due to the ever-changing tax landscape).

2. Account allocation. It becomes equally important where exactly you are investing. Roth accounts grow tax-free and qualified withdrawals are tax-free. You likely don't want to hinder that growth by choosing conservative assets (like fixed income, Money Market Funds, and so on).

Tax-efficient fund placement becomes extremely important when you also have a taxable brokerage account, along with tax-advantaged accounts. Many funds pay dividends and distribute capital gains if placed in your taxable brokerage account. At the end of the year, you receive a 1099 with that income and must pay taxes on the dividends and certain distributions.

One thing to call out from history is that you generally shouldn't hold Target Date Retirement mutual funds (or any "proprietary" funds) in your brokerage account. This is because unexpected redemptions could cause a huge tax bill.

You may remember a Vanguard 2021 fiasco where Vanguard opened an institutional TDF to more investors (lowered the minimum investment from $100M to $5M), which caused smaller retirement plans to sell out of individual funds and move into the institutional fund. This triggered massive unexpected capital gains for anyone invested in the individual funds if held in a brokerage account.

All of those unnecessary taxes could've been avoided by:

  • Choosing investments that don’t distribute many dividends or capital gains
  • Choosing passively managed investments (low portfolio turnover)
  • Placing them in tax-advantaged accounts

Let me give you a simple example:

Let’s say you are in a 22% federal tax bracket and a 5% state tax bracket, and you have some money invested in a dividend fund like Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). SCHD dividends are generally qualified, which means that the dividends get preferential treatment at a 15% federal tax rate for this investor.

The dividend yield is 3.43%. Considering the tax rates, the tax drag is (15% + 5%) * 3.43% = 0.686%.

To put this in perspective, a $10,000 investment will yield ~$343 in annual dividends. The tax impact on that investment will be $60.86.

Of course, if that money was in a Roth IRA, you would pay $0 in taxes on dividend distributions. Alternatively, this is something you may need to decide whether a dividend-focused investing strategy is the right one for you. For example, a Total US Stock Market ETF could have almost 3x less tax drag, and potentially more growth.

As someone in their 20s (who is subject to the Net Investment Income Tax) my focus is 100% on a growth investment strategy, rather than income generation. For someone in their 60s, that strategy could be different (even though selling shares for capital gains is better from a tax timing point of view).

A few more important points:

REIT stocks/ETFs are the least tax-efficient asset class to hold in a brokerage account because their distributions aren’t qualified, so you pay more tax (even though it may qualify for a 199A deduction).

Stocks that don’t pay dividends are the most tax-efficient to hold within your taxable account (Adobe, Amazon, Netflix, and others). However, holding individual stocks may not be the best strategy from an investment and diversification standpoint.

A big benefit of a taxable account is that the money is always easily accessible (liquidity), and you can control your withdrawal timing. While there are strategies that allow you to withdraw from retirement accounts before age 59 (like Rule of 55, 72(t) SoSEPP, Roth conversions), a brokerage account is more flexible. Therefore, analyzing the contributions and investments that go into this account is crucial.

How do you maximize tax efficiency? Let us know in the comments!   Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.  

Read more »

The Home Ownership Gamble

"Dana, we experienced something similar with our first and 2nd homes (almost the same year of purchase as well), except that we sold our first home for exactly what we paid for it and had been underwater for the 8 years (4 more than the original plan) we owned it. The 2nd home, the one we raised our kids in and still own has more than tripled in value. Of course we have done lots of improvements that we wanted to and ultimately we have a relationship with our home-comfort, memories, a solid sense of security-and it has been a forced savings that has allowed us to build a certain amount of wealth which we can touch if needed. I see the memes about moving every 2 years and pocketing the increase in value tax free but real estate (like all investments) is volatile and if you're counting on it always going up, there will sometimes be disappointment. But if you are purchasing a home for reasons other than "just" investment" there is nothing like a place of ones own."
- Rachna Condos
Read more »

Simplify Everything

"Kristine: The subscription auto-shipment thing is a great idea too. Like you, we have that set up for our dog food needs (we have two hungry border terriers), and certain over the counter medications and pantry items that we consistently use. That adds to the list of things to not have to remember, not run out of and not have to go shopping for. We also make a weekly Costco run, but at this point it is still something I enjoy and I coordinate that visit with my weekly gasoline fill up. But, thanks for the "Instacart" subscription idea. I'll have to remember that for future reference."
- Doug C
Read more »

Stock Market Contest

"My guess is individual stocks will win but a broad fund will best most others. At least there may be one lesson there."
- Randy Dobkin
Read more »

Why I use a Donor-Advised Fund

"Our after tax account is pretty equally divided between a total market index fund and a tax efficient fund. The performance of the two is very similar. But when doing our taxes this year, I noticed the index fund had major taxable gains; the taxable income on the tax efficient fund was zero. I’m also concerned about leaving my kids— who are high earning professionals— taxable IRAs. We do regular major Roth conversions each year."
- Marilyn Lavin
Read more »

Getting Older

"Thanks everyone for all of your wonderful comments and ideas. You've provided plenty of great advice on how to better grow old. It doesn't sound all that bad after all. And some of these ideas were even tangentially related to financial matters 😉"
- Doug C
Read more »

Carrying Humble Dollar Forward

"Same for me, Andrew. I struggle to think of things to write about that haven't been addressed by other writers, so, I just lurk and respond."
- Dave Melick
Read more »

Perfection, enemy of good

"I think your plan is an excellent launch pad for most people. As I look back, I have benefited from making 401k contributions every two weeks since 1994. Not through some great financial wisdom, it just seemed like a good idea to get the company match (free money) when I started. I set it and mostly forgot it. With the exception of over time increasing contributions with pay raises until I was able to max out the contribution limit. For many years the quarterly paper statement received in the mail was my only window into progress being made and I didn't pay attention to the stock market. Simple. Back then I did not understand the complexities of investing and the potential pitfalls. It is only over the last 5-6 years that I have sought to better educate myself. In retrospect I am sure that I would have been much better off today if low-cost index funds had been available as a choice in my 401K, fortunately I wasn't paying outrageous fees either. Over the past 2-3 years, I have been trying to give some financial advice to my now 30-year-old daughter. At first some suggested reading and websites, to no avail, and some gentle prompts to let me look under the hood of her finances. Eventually, when the time was right for her, she did allow me to take a look under the hood. Unfortunately, I found credit card debt (for which she was making minimum payments) and while she did have a 401k retirement plan, its balance was meagre and she was not saving enough to take full advantage of the company match. Today she has a simple plan:
  1. Credit Card Debt is gone and several cards cancelled
  2. She is automatically saving 10% to her 401K each pay-check
  3. She is invested 100% in a low-cost Target Date Fund
I consider this a major achievement! When I saw the title of your article for some reason it made me think of an interview with Bono from U2 discussing the bands success and longevity. He said, in reference to selecting songs for an album, "good is the enemy of great". That might be the case for a rock band but not necessarily for personal investing / retirement planning."
- Grant Clifford
Read more »

Recency Bias (or: You’re Running Buggy Software)

"I agree that recency bias is important. The “news” can be equally detrimental to our financial plans. I should restate that and say I think we should be very selective about our information sources. I prefer written ones, but AI “slop” is making it even more difficult to get a grasp on reality.  With all of the negativity, what’s the reality for my accounts? I’m using data as of 4/7/2026.  I would hope that HD readers are “long term” investors. By that I mean investing with the intention to hold for 10-15 years.  I do use a long-term approach and it has worked for me. Of course, there are short-term ups, and downs. For example, I own a TIPS fund and even with dividends the current value shows a “loss” of 2.96%. But that fund is only 1.92% of my portfolio ( I prefer to hold bonds). The real decline to the portfolio is 0.058%. That miniscule amount is hardly worth thinking about.  I think it is useful to define investment gyrations as declines or increases. After all, there is no loss incurred (or gain) until one sells and cashes out.  Anything purchased recently may show a short-term decline in value. If we think long-term, it is reasonable to assume there will be an increase in the future. Certain, more volatile stocks or investments may not behave with the overall stock market. That’s the nature of speculation.  My point is, even a 50/50 portfolio can do very well, long term. Mine has. However, I’m retired and so I am prudently more conservative and practice wealth defense. This would not be my approach if I were more than 10 years from retirement.   My portfolio currently shows an increase in value of 0.4% since 12/31/2025. It shows an increase of 10.25% since 12/31/2024. The increase would be greater if I didn’t take RMDs, and if I hadn’t withdrawn 10% in 2023. The S&P 500 shows a recent decline of about 2.6%.  Certain investments have been helpful to me. My Gold and Precious Metals fund shows a recent decline in value, although it is up about 130%. A utility I purchased in 2014 is up 400%. My energy ETF is up about 250%. There are 15 holdings which have more than doubled in value.  Even the S&P 500 shows a 5-year gain of 62%, excluding dividends.  If, after analyzing your portfolio you find it to be too volatile or subject to larger declines recently, let’s say greater than 10%, then perhaps you should re-evaluate your approach. However, if you are young, you may have decades of investing ahead  If the market perturbation is disturbing, take a look at your net worth. With recent real estate value increases many of us have seen an increase in our net worth, even if we fully depreciate automobiles, etc. In my case, because I have not spent all of my annual RMDs, the remainder goes into savings. That too has improved my net worth.  "
- normr60189
Read more »

Blood Money

"Here's a podcast episode on the topic, from Ed Slott & Jeffrey Levine: https://open.spotify.com/episode/0C0CfDdTmFKsR07DBLkuJu?si=2PpP8uw1SJW45ijpYlSJxQ"
- Randy Dobkin
Read more »

Financial regrets about parenthood?

"That would indeed be a terrific article idea, Kristine, especially since financial planning for elder care is top of mind for many still-working couples. My own household is a dream situation for an elderly person. Mama (my MIL) is the center of attention for both her daughters and her son-in-law. Even the dog listens to her."
- Mike Gaynes
Read more »

Any concern?

"I’m near retirement and all set with the portfolio AA initial conditions, specifically with a healthy dose of fixed income ready to weather an inevitable market downturn. What I’m a bit unsure of is refilling my fixed income efficiently &!sufficiently as time goes on. I have the usual plan of rebalancing and its nuances, but we’ll see how it goes. I’m fairly confident, have read a ton and run the numbers but haven’t done this before. Retirement: There’s always that first time ;)."
- Andy Morrison
Read more »

Tax Efficiency

TAX EFFICIENT FUND placement is an often underrated topic. The goal of the tax efficient fund placement is to minimize taxes within your investments, and select the right account for those investments.

But how much does that actually matter?

Vanguard’s research finds that a thoughtful asset location strategy can add significantly more value than an equal location strategy. The value added typically ranges from 5 to 30 basis points of after-tax return, depending on circumstances (e.g., income, portfolio size).

Investors generally have access to different account types, including:

  • Tax-free accounts (Roth IRA, Roth 401(k))
  • Taxable brokerage accounts
  • Tax-deferred accounts (401(k), 403(b), Traditional IRA)

If you are an employee that may not have access to a retirement plan, you could perhaps consider a Solo 401(k) if you have "side hustle" business income.

Generally, if your investments are all in tax-deferred or tax-free accounts, fund placement will not make a huge difference for you. That is because these accounts already come with tax efficiency.

If that's your case, two things become important though:

1. Consideration between pre-tax, like Traditional 401(k) or after-tax account, like Roth 401(k). Put simply, this decision generally comes down to your marginal tax rate now versus marginal tax rate in the future (which isn't something easy to predict due to the ever-changing tax landscape).

2. Account allocation. It becomes equally important where exactly you are investing. Roth accounts grow tax-free and qualified withdrawals are tax-free. You likely don't want to hinder that growth by choosing conservative assets (like fixed income, Money Market Funds, and so on).

Tax-efficient fund placement becomes extremely important when you also have a taxable brokerage account, along with tax-advantaged accounts. Many funds pay dividends and distribute capital gains if placed in your taxable brokerage account. At the end of the year, you receive a 1099 with that income and must pay taxes on the dividends and certain distributions.

One thing to call out from history is that you generally shouldn't hold Target Date Retirement mutual funds (or any "proprietary" funds) in your brokerage account. This is because unexpected redemptions could cause a huge tax bill.

You may remember a Vanguard 2021 fiasco where Vanguard opened an institutional TDF to more investors (lowered the minimum investment from $100M to $5M), which caused smaller retirement plans to sell out of individual funds and move into the institutional fund. This triggered massive unexpected capital gains for anyone invested in the individual funds if held in a brokerage account.

All of those unnecessary taxes could've been avoided by:

  • Choosing investments that don’t distribute many dividends or capital gains
  • Choosing passively managed investments (low portfolio turnover)
  • Placing them in tax-advantaged accounts

Let me give you a simple example:

Let’s say you are in a 22% federal tax bracket and a 5% state tax bracket, and you have some money invested in a dividend fund like Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). SCHD dividends are generally qualified, which means that the dividends get preferential treatment at a 15% federal tax rate for this investor.

The dividend yield is 3.43%. Considering the tax rates, the tax drag is (15% + 5%) * 3.43% = 0.686%.

To put this in perspective, a $10,000 investment will yield ~$343 in annual dividends. The tax impact on that investment will be $60.86.

Of course, if that money was in a Roth IRA, you would pay $0 in taxes on dividend distributions. Alternatively, this is something you may need to decide whether a dividend-focused investing strategy is the right one for you. For example, a Total US Stock Market ETF could have almost 3x less tax drag, and potentially more growth.

As someone in their 20s (who is subject to the Net Investment Income Tax) my focus is 100% on a growth investment strategy, rather than income generation. For someone in their 60s, that strategy could be different (even though selling shares for capital gains is better from a tax timing point of view).

A few more important points:

REIT stocks/ETFs are the least tax-efficient asset class to hold in a brokerage account because their distributions aren’t qualified, so you pay more tax (even though it may qualify for a 199A deduction).

Stocks that don’t pay dividends are the most tax-efficient to hold within your taxable account (Adobe, Amazon, Netflix, and others). However, holding individual stocks may not be the best strategy from an investment and diversification standpoint.

A big benefit of a taxable account is that the money is always easily accessible (liquidity), and you can control your withdrawal timing. While there are strategies that allow you to withdraw from retirement accounts before age 59 (like Rule of 55, 72(t) SoSEPP, Roth conversions), a brokerage account is more flexible. Therefore, analyzing the contributions and investments that go into this account is crucial.

How do you maximize tax efficiency? Let us know in the comments!   Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.  

Read more »

The Home Ownership Gamble

"Dana, we experienced something similar with our first and 2nd homes (almost the same year of purchase as well), except that we sold our first home for exactly what we paid for it and had been underwater for the 8 years (4 more than the original plan) we owned it. The 2nd home, the one we raised our kids in and still own has more than tripled in value. Of course we have done lots of improvements that we wanted to and ultimately we have a relationship with our home-comfort, memories, a solid sense of security-and it has been a forced savings that has allowed us to build a certain amount of wealth which we can touch if needed. I see the memes about moving every 2 years and pocketing the increase in value tax free but real estate (like all investments) is volatile and if you're counting on it always going up, there will sometimes be disappointment. But if you are purchasing a home for reasons other than "just" investment" there is nothing like a place of ones own."
- Rachna Condos
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 29: WHAT MATTERS to long-term stock investors is the market’s dividend yield and growth in earnings per share. Everything else is noise that can bully and seduce us into foolishness.

think

MONEY ILLUSION. We have the illusion we’re doing better if we earn 5% on our savings rather than 1%, even if these yields simply match the inflation rate—and hence in both cases we aren’t making any financial progress. In fact, earning 5% when inflation is 5% leaves us worse off, because we’ll lose more to taxes than in the lower-yielding scenario.

act

PREPARE FOR a long life. For a quick gauge of your life expectancy, try the Social Security and Society of Actuaries' Longevity Illustrator calculators. What will you learn? First, the longer you live, the longer you can expect to live. Second, lifespans vary widely. Educated, health-conscious Americans might live three or four years longer than average.

Truths

NO. 27: COST-CONSCIOUS investors can save thousands over their lifetime. Take two investors who salt away $5,000 a year for 40 years. One pays 1% of assets in annual investment costs, while the other incurs 0.1%. If both earn 5% a year before expenses, the cost-conscious investor will amass $618,000, while the high-cost investor garners $494,000.

Savings Initiative

Manifesto

NO. 29: WHAT MATTERS to long-term stock investors is the market’s dividend yield and growth in earnings per share. Everything else is noise that can bully and seduce us into foolishness.

Spotlight: Advisors

Staying Wealthy

A CLOSE FRIEND’S LONG career in the motion picture business recently came to an end when the studio eliminated her job. Even before the pandemic, the industry was changing, so she wasn’t surprised or, for that matter, especially sad about getting laid off. She was lucky to receive a good severance package and is now ready to do something different. But finding the right job will likely take time, so carefully managing her cash through the transition period is crucial.

Read more »

Your Results May Vary

“SELL THE SIZZLE, BOYS.” With those words from the sales manager at a big insurance company, the 2003 class of newly minted registered representatives were off to the races, extolling the virtues of the firm’s products to family, friends and anyone else who would listen.
I still vividly remember that moment. Yes, I was there.
To become registered reps, the 2003 class had to pass the necessary exams to get a Series 6 securities license and a license to sell life and health insurance.

Read more »

Finding Flat-Fee Financial Advisors

I noticed that in the post by Dick Quinn – beyond-fees-is-using-a-financial-advisor-advisable , couple of folks had mentioned having flat-fee advisors. I see that it is lot easier to find advisors that charge a % of the assets under management but one that I am not fond of.
Have read mixed reviews about FACET, have found two sites that have flat-fee FAs

https://www.flatfeeadvisors.org/
https://saragrillo.com/2022/03/14/flat-fee-financial-advisors/

Are there other resources that one can look up?
Part of the “holistic”

Read more »

Fishing for Feedback

I met with a Vice President of Fisher Investments, a very large and very well-advertised fee-only investment advisory firm, to see if they would be a good fit to manage my portfolio. It turns out they weren’t, and after they asked why, this was my reply:
Frank,
Thanks for taking the time to meet with me to explain how Fisher Investments works.
I respect you for asking for feedback. And since you asked:
1. I’m not a fan of the fee structure:
-Its size: Paying you $70,000 a year to manage my portfolio seems like an awful lot of money.

Read more »

Spotlight: Haggert

Vet These Policies

YOU LOVE THEM LIKE family. You want them to have the best care possible. You have insurance for yourself, your family, your home, your car and your upcoming vacation. Why not for your pet? One of our friends recently opted for pet insurance—after multiple trips to the vet, with more than 20 medications prescribed. Intrigued by the idea of pet insurance? Here are eight choices and what they offer: Pets Best covers everything, including medications, physical therapy and even acupuncture. It also covers senior pets and makes it easy by paying the veterinarian directly. You can decide if you want a $5,000 annual cap on reimbursement or unlimited coverage. You can also customize your policy. Payment options are monthly, quarterly or semiannually. Trupanion may be your choice if you prefer to avoid paying deductibles. It will also pay the veterinarian directly, and there’s no cap on the number of claims you can submit. There is, however, a limit to how much you can customize your policy. Lemonade is great for digital claims. Your claim can be reimbursed within minutes through an app on your phone. The coverage isn’t available in all states. ASPCA offers complete and accident-only coverage. Coverage starts at $10 a month and allows you to adjust the reimbursements to suit your budget. Pumpkin plans can have annual caps on reimbursements, such as $20,000 for dogs and $15,000 for cats, though pet owners can also pay up for unlimited coverage. Healthy Paws doesn’t cover hip dysplasia, a common dog problem, if a pet is six years or older at the time of enrollment. Prudent Pet offers acupuncture and chiropractic care coverage if a veterinarian recommends it. It may have a longer claim-processing wait time than some of the other policies. Nationwide covers cats and dogs, but also exotic pets. This…
Read more »

A Taste for Junk

BONDS ARE IN THE NEWS again. Everyone’s talking about Series I savings bonds and Treasurys. But what about corporate bonds, both investment-grade and junk? Nine years ago, we started following Marc Lichtenfeld’s investment service that recommends corporate bonds. When my husband suggested we try it, I asked, “Aren’t corporate bonds junk bonds?” Forgive the holiday reference, but I had visions of Michael Milken dancing in my head. From the beginning, my husband was all in. He was intrigued by the high rates corporates would pay and the opportunity for diversification. I was concerned about the risk. Once we got started, though, I found a lot to like. Corporate bonds carry ratings that help distinguish their creditworthiness. Three credit rating agencies—Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch—sort corporates into investment grade, speculative grade, likely to default and defaulting. Each tier has a corresponding letter grade, from AAA to D. Bond buyers can look up the gradations among the three rating agencies to understand what each rating means for any given bond. In general, a top rating of AAA is reserved for U.S. Treasurys and the strongest blue-chip companies. Investment-grade corporate bonds can get grades ranging from AA+ to BBB-. Anything lower is speculative or not investment grade—junk, in other words. We compromised by buying investment-grade bonds at first. Gradually, we ventured further into the depths of junk, even buying C- and D-rated bonds as time went on. These are the bottom rungs of junk. A grade of D, for example, usually signifies “in default.” How, then, have our junk bonds held up? Surprisingly well. For a risk-averse investor like me, a crucial selling point was their relatively low default rate of 2.5% to 3.5%. High-yield bonds have also posted sturdy returns, according to Bloomberg data cited by money manager Hotchkis & Wiley. The…
Read more »

Lodging Complaints

PRESIDENT BIDEN’S State of the Union speech this month touched a nerve when he mentioned “junk fees.” Talking about hotel costs, he said, “Those fees can cost you up to $90 a night at hotels that aren’t even resorts.” I was reminded of the first time we were hit with a resort fee. It was at a Marriott hotel in New York City. A bicycle was part of the “resort” package. I don’t know about you, but I couldn’t see myself—as a tourist—riding a bicycle down Fifth Avenue. To make matters worse, wi-fi was also a part of the fee. Really? That’s included in our hotel loyalty program, Marriott Bonvoy Platinum Elite Membership. So now we’re paying for something we get for free? A newsletter from The Points Guy came to my rescue. It recently ran an article about Marriott’s fees and how they can be avoided. It’s right in the hotel’s terms and conditions, which can be found at the bottom of Marriott’s website. This is something we all check, right? The internet access terms and conditions are in section 1.3. c.ii, which states, “Participating properties with mandatory resort charges, which include internet access, will provide a replacement benefit, to be determined at each participating property’s discretion.” Translation: Marriott locations that participate in the loyalty program aren’t supposed to charge for something you’re entitled to get for free. They can waive the resort fee or offer you a freebie, such as a $25 daily credit for food and drink. The article warned not to expect the hotel to roll over and play dead. It found some properties were very forthcoming and even comped the entire resort fee. Other properties acted like they were being nickeled and dimed. The best course of action is to contact Marriott Bonvoy by phone…
Read more »

He Says She Says

MY HUSBAND AND I have been selecting investments together for years—and we’re still married. How have we gotten along for decades without killing each other? Our investment discussions revolve mostly around individual stocks and bonds. They constitute the bulk of our investments and take up the bulk of our time. We own everything from small amounts of risky stocks like Immutep (symbol: IMMP) to blue chips like Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and 3M (MMM). Riskier stocks involve a lot of back and forth, while our discussions about blue chips are quick and easy. After all, what’s not to love about a dividend aristocrat—those stocks that increase their dividend every year? We get recommendations on funds from our financial advisor. Those are also easy discussions because the parameters we set up are clear. For instance, our advisor recently suggested a closed-end fund that looked good to us because the fees were low, it invested in municipal bonds—something we’re lacking—and the credit quality and distributions looked enticing. Problem is, the fund’s shares were selling at a premium to the fund’s net asset value, which is its portfolio value on a per-share basis. We agreed to continue watching the fund and buy when it was at a discount. Sometimes, our decisions take an especially long time. Consider bitcoin. We’d been talking about adding cryptocurrency to our portfolio since 2017. During a seminar in 2018, we were introduced to the workings of cryptocurrencies by someone we respected. But we didn’t do anything. In 2019, we were reading about hyperinflation in Venezuela and hearing firsthand reports that bitcoin was being used to purchase goods and services. The buzz seemed here to stay. In January 2020, we finally decided to buy. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] Let’s face it, when we make investment decisions, the stakes are high: Success…
Read more »

Rules for Gift Giving

IT’S THE MOST wonderful time of year—for trying to figure out what gifts to give. If you’re like me, you may be wringing your hands. But some studies and a bit of psychology could help. While searching my favorite websites for gift ideas, I came across a helpful article by psychologist Jill Suttie. She offered five suggestions. The first is to make sure the gift is practical. I didn’t see that one coming. Practical gifts are remembered. Expensive gifts aren’t necessarily better. Please don’t tell my husband. You’ll be able to relate to No. 2 if you have small children: Initial enthusiasm doesn’t equate to long-term satisfaction. Have you ever given a child that toy he wanted, only to see him set it aside after a few days or even a few hours, never to be touched again? Suttie says we shouldn’t aim to wow the recipient momentarily with something flashy, but rather give a present likely to deliver longer-term happiness. Third, people prefer gifts they’ve asked for rather than something you thought they’d appreciate. I can relate to this. Growing up, my mother rarely bought something on the spot when I wanted it. But often, I would later find it under the Christmas tree or as a birthday gift. I’m sure this was her way of ensuring her only child didn’t become a spoiled brat. I hope she succeeded. Fourth, there’s been much talk about giving experiences over things. According to science, this brings about feelings of closeness between the gift-giver and the recipient. Finally, there was one caution I found interesting: Don’t give folks a gift if they don’t want one. Such gifts are seen as self-serving, creating a sense of indebtedness. Suttie’s article reminded me that the point of giving gifts is to strengthen relationships. That helped…
Read more »

A Dark Place

WHERE WOULD WE BE without the internet, social media, and our smartphones and smartwatches? Can you remember a time when you couldn’t look up the answer to a trivia question at a cocktail party? I love answering the phone on my watch. It takes me back to Dick Tracy. There I was, going along happily in my online universe—until I got an email from McAfee’s identity theft protection service alerting me that my phone number had been found on the dark web. I got the McAfee service courtesy of T-Mobile, my wireless provider, after its data breach. What ensued was an onslaught of spam. Some of the texts were ridiculous, others almost believable. As if that wasn’t disturbing enough, not long afterward, McAfee alerted me that my Social Security and driver’s license numbers were also purportedly found on the dark web. My initial reaction was panic. I went to McAfee’s website and did everything it told me to do. Because my phone number had been found on the dark web, it said to be on the lookout for suspicious calls and to contact my phone carrier if they got out of hand. Changing my phone number was recommended only as a last resort. The website also suggested that I: Put my name on the National Do Not Call Registry. I was already on it. Check my credit reports. Done. I do this continuously. Check all financial accounts. I also do this continuously. I knew that last year the Federal Communications Commission had started requiring large telecom companies to adopt a technical protocol known as STIR/SHAKEN. This requires that calls must originate from the phone number that appears on your phone. I’ve seen the robocalls I receive fall sharply because of this requirement, so I felt this would also happen with the unwanted…
Read more »