FREE NEWSLETTER

When we make financial choices, we usually have a pretty good idea what we’re getting. But what are we giving up?

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Which bond fund?

"Totally agree with your thoughts on bonds, echoes my reason to hold them."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Happy Hour, or The Panic Button? Why Early Retirement Anxiety Is Real.

"This is a message all of us retirees should read and profit from!"
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

What do you DESERVE?

"I second that—self-funded cold beer and more hair, definitely a winning one-two combination!"
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Discussing money matters with friends- a slippery slope

"He buys the cake and supplies the coffee - it's a $60 cake, too. I make the tea for the tea drinkers."
- Ormode
Read more »

Property taxes, our schools, our towns and seniors. Shared responsibility.

"The use the sad stories of a few seniors to justify a deduction for all seniors which is just wrong given that many seniors are very well off financially. Any deductions should include an income/asset limit. But wow, NJ taxes are high!!! No wonder so many seniors leave the state. The problem with schools is that they are a never ending money pit. Does anyone review the school system for excessive spending? The incentives are all to spend more. If cuts come, they hit the teachers first, to create public sympathy, rather than administrative positions/other."
- AnthonyClan
Read more »

How to build your nest egg

"I really appreciate your Kiplinger Magazine reference. It was my "go to" for all things financial"
- L H
Read more »

Lump sum Vs Monthly Payment – Which pension option is better?

"Investing small amounts regularly is often the best approach for most people because it builds discipline, smooths out market ups and downs, and removes the pressure of trying to pick the “perfect” moment to begin. This strategy, called pound-cost averaging, lets you steadily grow your investments even when markets are volatile, making it ideal for beginners or anyone who prefers a low-stress approach. On the other hand, if you already have a significant amount saved, a lump-sum investment can statistically produce higher long-term returns. Markets generally rise over time, so getting your money invested earlier gives it more time to grow. The downside is the emotional difficulty if the market drops shortly after you invest, it can feel discouraging, which is why this method suits people who have a higher risk tolerance. A balanced alternative is a hybrid strategy. You invest a portion of your money upfront say 30–50% and drip-feed the rest monthly. This approach reduces timing risk, gives you early market exposure, and still maintains the steady benefits of regular investing. Many UK investors use this method to feel more comfortable while still aiming for long-term growth. Besides traditional stocks and funds, some people pursue other profitable investment plans such as real estate (buy-to-let or REITs), government or corporate bonds, peer-to-peer lending, gold, and diversified ETFs across global markets. Others explore long-term business ownership, private equity crowdfunding, or even income-producing digital assets. Each comes with its own risk level and suitability depending on your goals and experience. If you want to learn more about investing, great places to start include online courses (Coursera, Udemy, Khan Academy), trusted UK financial websites (Chaincapital….dotus, The Money Advice Service, , or FCA resources), and books like “The Little Book of Common Sense Investing” or “A Random Walk Down Wall Street.” You can also learn through YouTube channels focused on finance, podcasts like Meaningful Money UK, and beginner-friendly platforms that offer free educational hubs."
- Alex Ware
Read more »

My Investing Journey, Just Do It

"Good job. It is likely that if we invest consistently over long periods of time that we'll earn 5% or more on our money. Within that context of consistent investing what would be a mistake? Over reliance on bonds at an early age could be one. Trading rather than investing is another.  Inertia is yet a third. Improper allocation is a fourth, and so on. Today, some are willing to continue to let their stocks ride, ignoring the impact of a 30-40% decline on their stock portfolio. Such a decline could erase 5 years of gains. Saying “I could handle that” would be a mistake for many of us who could not bear white knuckle stock declines. The WSJ ran an article “Meet the teens investing in stocks for their future home and retirement”. There have been similar articles in the past, but many of these “investors” bail when the bear market or a sharp downturn occurs. As I recall earlier articles indicated how young investors became disillusioned by the 2021-2022 downturn.  Today, after the S&P 500 nearly doubling in 5 years, there is a lot of interest in the stock market. Buying at the top is a mistake, unless one is willing to hold for 10+ years. That could allow a recovery. Individual stocks can also be a trap. Today with a handful of tech concentrated stocks dominating the S&P 500 this is not the index I remember."
- normr60189
Read more »

What I Learned Trying to Leave an Employer-Sponsored Medicare Advantage Plan

"I’m confused, you say your premium was going to double but you don’t say what your premium was. I’m on an employer sponsored plan but there is no premium that I pay, nor are there deductibles (just small copay) with an out of pocket max of maybe a couple thousand dollars. We can use any doctor in or out of network."
- Jay Framson
Read more »

Decision Frameworks

IN THE SUMMER of 1966, author John McPhee spent two weeks lying on a picnic table in his backyard. Why? McPhee was suffering from writer’s block. As he described it, “I had assembled enough material to fill a silo, and now I had no idea what to do with it.” Investors find themselves in a similar situation today. There’s no shortage of financial information around us. But that doesn’t make it easier to know what to do with it.  When it comes to financial decision-making, there is, of course, one fundamental problem: None of us can see around corners. But that doesn’t leave us completely empty-handed. Whenever possible, I suggest employing decision frameworks. They can help us to do the best we can in the absence of complete information. Here are four such frameworks you might consider as you look ahead to the new year. Trading decisions Suppose you’re lukewarm on an investment and thinking of selling it. How should you think through this decision? To start, you might evaluate the investment’s merits. If it’s an individual stock, you could examine its valuation and study the company’s financials. If it’s a fund, you could look at its track record and management fees. And if it’s held in a taxable account, you could also check its tax efficiency.  Against those factors, you would then assess the tax impact of selling your shares. But how should you weight each factor in your decision? A fund might be tax-inefficient, for example, but have a good track record. When making decisions like this, the framework I suggest is to evaluate three factors: risk, growth potential and tax impact. And I would consider them in that order. Estate taxes The federal estate tax can be punitive for those with assets over the lifetime exclusion. Under current law, that’s $15 million per person, but it’s a political football and could easily change down the road. Many states also impose their own estate taxes, with much lower exclusions. For those with assets even in the neighborhood of the applicable exclusion, it might seem like an obvious decision to pursue estate tax strategies. Indeed, many families conclude that it’s worth virtually any amount of time, effort and cost to limit their exposure to these steep taxes. That’s a logical conclusion, but it’s not the only way. Other families take a different view. They reason that if their estates will be subject to tax, then, by definition, their children will be receiving substantial sums. Since that’s the case, they don’t see the need for acrobatics to leave their children even more, especially since those strategies usually introduce cost and complexity.  The most typical estate tax strategy, for example, is an irrevocable trust. In addition to the legal work required to set one up, these trusts require third-party trustees, and trustees typically ask to be compensated. This kind of trust also requires a separate tax return each year. Also, assets in trusts like this don’t benefit from a cost basis step-up at death, making the tax benefit a little more uncertain. Estate tax strategies, in other words, might make sense, but they aren’t the obvious “right” answer in all cases. That’s why, as you think through this question for your own family, you might employ this simple framework: Start by asking yourself which objective is more important: to keep taxes to an absolute minimum or, on the other hand, to keep complexity to a minimum. Let that be your guide. Portfolio construction How much effort should you put into your portfolio? Author Mike Piper draws an apt analogy. Building a portfolio, he said, is like making a fruit salad. Here’s how he explained it: “If you choose to have just 3-4 ingredients in your fruit salad instead of 7, that’s fine…There’s no one single recipe that beats the others…And you don’t have to be super precise about it—a little more or less of something than you had intended is not a disaster.” It’s an important point. Because there are so many available investment options, and because there is so much information and commentary around us, it can sometimes feel like we need to do more to optimize our investments. The reality, though, is that this is a choice. Just as with estate tax strategies, you might yield a benefit by fine tuning your portfolio, but you shouldn’t feel compelled to. The most important thing is that it be reasonable. As long as you aren’t taking inordinate risk, it’s a choice whether you choose to have five, 10 or 500 holdings in your portfolio. As Piper points out, you won’t necessarily go wrong with whichever path you choose, so choose the path that suits you. A 360-degree view Earlier in my career, I worked as an investment analyst at a firm where we were responsible for picking stocks. In discussing an idea with a colleague one day, it occurred to us that if you knew enough about any given stock, you could easily make an argument either for or against that stock. It was in the eye of the beholder. Consider a stock like Nvidia. On the one hand, it’s the dominant player in a fast-growing market and has enviable profit margins. But those margins are inviting competition, and there are concerns that the market is becoming saturated. Which set of arguments is correct? As with all financial decisions, we can’t know without the benefit of hindsight. That’s why I suggest what I call the “five minds” approach. Instead of taking a single position on a given question, try to look at it from all sides, balancing the viewpoints of an optimist a pessimist, an analyst, a psychologist and an economist. How would this work in practice? If there’s an idea that looks like it makes sense, pause and ask what the opposing argument might be. If you’re looking at a question through a quantitative lens, pause and ask what the qualitative factors might be. And always consider the broader context. Suppose, for example, you’re considering a Roth conversion. A key element in that equation is whether future tax rates will be higher or lower than they are today. To help answer this question, we could consult history as a guide, looking at historical tax rates and government debt levels. No one has a crystal ball. But since that’s the case, frameworks like this can help us manage through decisions with incomplete information.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

The 4 Year Rule for Retirement Spending

"I wouldn't follow this plan as written myself, nor the AAII version Mark writes about, because I wouldn't want everything other than four or five years spending in equities. That is far more exposure to volatility than I want. Instead, my asset allocation specifies 50% in stock funds, and I rebalance when I take my RMD. If I noticed I was off by 5% or more I would rebalance then, as well. Currently I am spending about 1%, if/when I get to 4% maybe I will reconsider."
- mytimetotravel
Read more »

Which bond fund?

"Totally agree with your thoughts on bonds, echoes my reason to hold them."
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Happy Hour, or The Panic Button? Why Early Retirement Anxiety Is Real.

"This is a message all of us retirees should read and profit from!"
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

What do you DESERVE?

"I second that—self-funded cold beer and more hair, definitely a winning one-two combination!"
- Mark Crothers
Read more »

Discussing money matters with friends- a slippery slope

"He buys the cake and supplies the coffee - it's a $60 cake, too. I make the tea for the tea drinkers."
- Ormode
Read more »

Property taxes, our schools, our towns and seniors. Shared responsibility.

"The use the sad stories of a few seniors to justify a deduction for all seniors which is just wrong given that many seniors are very well off financially. Any deductions should include an income/asset limit. But wow, NJ taxes are high!!! No wonder so many seniors leave the state. The problem with schools is that they are a never ending money pit. Does anyone review the school system for excessive spending? The incentives are all to spend more. If cuts come, they hit the teachers first, to create public sympathy, rather than administrative positions/other."
- AnthonyClan
Read more »

How to build your nest egg

"I really appreciate your Kiplinger Magazine reference. It was my "go to" for all things financial"
- L H
Read more »

Lump sum Vs Monthly Payment – Which pension option is better?

"Investing small amounts regularly is often the best approach for most people because it builds discipline, smooths out market ups and downs, and removes the pressure of trying to pick the “perfect” moment to begin. This strategy, called pound-cost averaging, lets you steadily grow your investments even when markets are volatile, making it ideal for beginners or anyone who prefers a low-stress approach. On the other hand, if you already have a significant amount saved, a lump-sum investment can statistically produce higher long-term returns. Markets generally rise over time, so getting your money invested earlier gives it more time to grow. The downside is the emotional difficulty if the market drops shortly after you invest, it can feel discouraging, which is why this method suits people who have a higher risk tolerance. A balanced alternative is a hybrid strategy. You invest a portion of your money upfront say 30–50% and drip-feed the rest monthly. This approach reduces timing risk, gives you early market exposure, and still maintains the steady benefits of regular investing. Many UK investors use this method to feel more comfortable while still aiming for long-term growth. Besides traditional stocks and funds, some people pursue other profitable investment plans such as real estate (buy-to-let or REITs), government or corporate bonds, peer-to-peer lending, gold, and diversified ETFs across global markets. Others explore long-term business ownership, private equity crowdfunding, or even income-producing digital assets. Each comes with its own risk level and suitability depending on your goals and experience. If you want to learn more about investing, great places to start include online courses (Coursera, Udemy, Khan Academy), trusted UK financial websites (Chaincapital….dotus, The Money Advice Service, , or FCA resources), and books like “The Little Book of Common Sense Investing” or “A Random Walk Down Wall Street.” You can also learn through YouTube channels focused on finance, podcasts like Meaningful Money UK, and beginner-friendly platforms that offer free educational hubs."
- Alex Ware
Read more »

My Investing Journey, Just Do It

"Good job. It is likely that if we invest consistently over long periods of time that we'll earn 5% or more on our money. Within that context of consistent investing what would be a mistake? Over reliance on bonds at an early age could be one. Trading rather than investing is another.  Inertia is yet a third. Improper allocation is a fourth, and so on. Today, some are willing to continue to let their stocks ride, ignoring the impact of a 30-40% decline on their stock portfolio. Such a decline could erase 5 years of gains. Saying “I could handle that” would be a mistake for many of us who could not bear white knuckle stock declines. The WSJ ran an article “Meet the teens investing in stocks for their future home and retirement”. There have been similar articles in the past, but many of these “investors” bail when the bear market or a sharp downturn occurs. As I recall earlier articles indicated how young investors became disillusioned by the 2021-2022 downturn.  Today, after the S&P 500 nearly doubling in 5 years, there is a lot of interest in the stock market. Buying at the top is a mistake, unless one is willing to hold for 10+ years. That could allow a recovery. Individual stocks can also be a trap. Today with a handful of tech concentrated stocks dominating the S&P 500 this is not the index I remember."
- normr60189
Read more »

Decision Frameworks

IN THE SUMMER of 1966, author John McPhee spent two weeks lying on a picnic table in his backyard. Why? McPhee was suffering from writer’s block. As he described it, “I had assembled enough material to fill a silo, and now I had no idea what to do with it.” Investors find themselves in a similar situation today. There’s no shortage of financial information around us. But that doesn’t make it easier to know what to do with it.  When it comes to financial decision-making, there is, of course, one fundamental problem: None of us can see around corners. But that doesn’t leave us completely empty-handed. Whenever possible, I suggest employing decision frameworks. They can help us to do the best we can in the absence of complete information. Here are four such frameworks you might consider as you look ahead to the new year. Trading decisions Suppose you’re lukewarm on an investment and thinking of selling it. How should you think through this decision? To start, you might evaluate the investment’s merits. If it’s an individual stock, you could examine its valuation and study the company’s financials. If it’s a fund, you could look at its track record and management fees. And if it’s held in a taxable account, you could also check its tax efficiency.  Against those factors, you would then assess the tax impact of selling your shares. But how should you weight each factor in your decision? A fund might be tax-inefficient, for example, but have a good track record. When making decisions like this, the framework I suggest is to evaluate three factors: risk, growth potential and tax impact. And I would consider them in that order. Estate taxes The federal estate tax can be punitive for those with assets over the lifetime exclusion. Under current law, that’s $15 million per person, but it’s a political football and could easily change down the road. Many states also impose their own estate taxes, with much lower exclusions. For those with assets even in the neighborhood of the applicable exclusion, it might seem like an obvious decision to pursue estate tax strategies. Indeed, many families conclude that it’s worth virtually any amount of time, effort and cost to limit their exposure to these steep taxes. That’s a logical conclusion, but it’s not the only way. Other families take a different view. They reason that if their estates will be subject to tax, then, by definition, their children will be receiving substantial sums. Since that’s the case, they don’t see the need for acrobatics to leave their children even more, especially since those strategies usually introduce cost and complexity.  The most typical estate tax strategy, for example, is an irrevocable trust. In addition to the legal work required to set one up, these trusts require third-party trustees, and trustees typically ask to be compensated. This kind of trust also requires a separate tax return each year. Also, assets in trusts like this don’t benefit from a cost basis step-up at death, making the tax benefit a little more uncertain. Estate tax strategies, in other words, might make sense, but they aren’t the obvious “right” answer in all cases. That’s why, as you think through this question for your own family, you might employ this simple framework: Start by asking yourself which objective is more important: to keep taxes to an absolute minimum or, on the other hand, to keep complexity to a minimum. Let that be your guide. Portfolio construction How much effort should you put into your portfolio? Author Mike Piper draws an apt analogy. Building a portfolio, he said, is like making a fruit salad. Here’s how he explained it: “If you choose to have just 3-4 ingredients in your fruit salad instead of 7, that’s fine…There’s no one single recipe that beats the others…And you don’t have to be super precise about it—a little more or less of something than you had intended is not a disaster.” It’s an important point. Because there are so many available investment options, and because there is so much information and commentary around us, it can sometimes feel like we need to do more to optimize our investments. The reality, though, is that this is a choice. Just as with estate tax strategies, you might yield a benefit by fine tuning your portfolio, but you shouldn’t feel compelled to. The most important thing is that it be reasonable. As long as you aren’t taking inordinate risk, it’s a choice whether you choose to have five, 10 or 500 holdings in your portfolio. As Piper points out, you won’t necessarily go wrong with whichever path you choose, so choose the path that suits you. A 360-degree view Earlier in my career, I worked as an investment analyst at a firm where we were responsible for picking stocks. In discussing an idea with a colleague one day, it occurred to us that if you knew enough about any given stock, you could easily make an argument either for or against that stock. It was in the eye of the beholder. Consider a stock like Nvidia. On the one hand, it’s the dominant player in a fast-growing market and has enviable profit margins. But those margins are inviting competition, and there are concerns that the market is becoming saturated. Which set of arguments is correct? As with all financial decisions, we can’t know without the benefit of hindsight. That’s why I suggest what I call the “five minds” approach. Instead of taking a single position on a given question, try to look at it from all sides, balancing the viewpoints of an optimist a pessimist, an analyst, a psychologist and an economist. How would this work in practice? If there’s an idea that looks like it makes sense, pause and ask what the opposing argument might be. If you’re looking at a question through a quantitative lens, pause and ask what the qualitative factors might be. And always consider the broader context. Suppose, for example, you’re considering a Roth conversion. A key element in that equation is whether future tax rates will be higher or lower than they are today. To help answer this question, we could consult history as a guide, looking at historical tax rates and government debt levels. No one has a crystal ball. But since that’s the case, frameworks like this can help us manage through decisions with incomplete information.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 44: WE SHOULD view our debts as negative bonds. Instead of earning interest, we’re paying it. Tempted to buy bonds? First, we should see if we can earn more by paying down debt.

Truths

NO. 99: A REAL ESTATE agent’s greatest financial incentive isn’t to get us the best price, but to get us to act quickly. If we spend an extra month hunting for the right house to buy—or holding out for a higher price if we're looking to sell—the real estate agent might make little or no additional commission, but he or she will have to put in substantially more work.

act

TAKE REQUIRED minimum distributions. If you’re age 73 or older, the government insists you pull a minimum sum each year from your retirement accounts, except Roths. The deadline is Dec. 31, unless it’s your first year taking RMDs. Failure to comply can result in a tax penalty equal to 25% of the sum that should have been withdrawn but wasn't.

think

LAPSE PRICING. Some buyers of long-term-care (LTC) and cash-value life insurance drop their coverage, which means they paid premiums but got little or nothing in return. Aware of this, insurers often charge lower premiums to all policyholders. But this backfired with LTC insurance: The lapse rate proved lower than expected—hurting insurers’ profitability.

College-bound kids?

Manifesto

NO. 44: WE SHOULD view our debts as negative bonds. Instead of earning interest, we’re paying it. Tempted to buy bonds? First, we should see if we can earn more by paying down debt.

Spotlight: Taxes

Roth conversion opportunities extended

The new U.S. tax legislation extends today’s relatively low tax-rates that were implemented in 2017. While this tax legislation includes some new nuances that may impact retirees, the main tax-rate impact for Roth conversions has been extended for 2026 and beyond. Here are four reminders of the benefits and challenges with Roth conversions. “Roth on.”
Who should Roth:
https://humbledollar.com/2020/05/to-roth-or-not/
How Roth conversions can impact Medicare premiums:
https://humbledollar.com/2023/04/that-28000000-tax/
Rothing can lower future taxes especially when considering the widow’s tax after the first spouse passes and estate tax impacts:
https://humbledollar.com/2023/01/securing-lower-taxes/
Rothing may not gain ground on future RMD tax obligations due to growth in tax deferred accounts:
https://www.theretirementmanifesto.com/my-biggest-surprise-in-retirement/

Read more »

Yellen About Taxes

WHEN JANET YELLEN was nominated to be secretary of the treasury, the Senate Finance Committee staff went over her tax returns with a magnifying glass. Yellen, an economics PhD who taught at Harvard, always prepared the returns for herself and her husband, economics Nobel laureate George A. Akerlof.
“She discovered to her surprise that she had been doing the family taxes wrong for years,” reports Owen Ullmann in his excellent new biography of Yellen,

Read more »

Schooled on Taxes

IT’S PROPERTY TAX time. Amid the holiday mail from friends, many of us get notices of payments due from our friendly local tax assessor.
No one likes getting taxed. But in many places, property taxes make up a huge part of the funding for public education. What always surprises and irks me are those who say the tax is unfair because they don’t “use” the public schools.
One neighbor says he has no children.

Read more »

JCX-21-25

The Joint Committee on Taxation today posted their analysis of proposed changes to the current tax code. The 400+ page document is long but certainly easier to read than the tax bill that posted yesterday 5/12/2025.
Nothing final here but I think it will give a flavor to what may be coming in 2026.
https://www.jct.gov/publications/2025/jcx-21-25/

Read more »

Ten Points of Pain

I JUST COMPLETED my fourth year preparing tax returns as part of the federal government’s Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program. I’ve seen first-hand how confusing our tax code can be for many taxpayers. Here are the 10 areas of confusion I’ve encountered most often:
1. Income. Anyone looking through a tax return will see multiple definitions of income. There’s total income, adjusted gross income (AGI), modified adjusted gross income, provisional income and taxable income.

Read more »

Spotlight: Saha

Marginal Benefit

I'M A BIT EMBARRASSED to admit that, until I started toying with the idea of early retirement a few years ago, I was pretty ignorant about how Social Security worked. I didn’t even pay much attention to the FICA payroll taxes that were deducted from my paycheck. As I looked into it some more, the prospect of receiving lifelong monthly checks from the government came as a pleasant surprise. I started researching how much I might get. I learned that my retirement benefit depended primarily on two factors. First, the system would calculate a monthly benefit—called my primary insurance amount—based on my taxed Social Security earnings. The second factor would be when I decided to start benefits. I could claim Social Security as early as age 62, and take a permanent haircut on my benefits, or wait until as late as 70 to juice up my monthly payments. Based on my birth year, the system designated 67 as my normal retirement age. That’s when I would get 100% of my primary insurance amount—the benefit I’d earned by paying Social Security taxes. I was still unclear, though, exactly how my benefit would be calculated and whether early retirement might affect it. Should I plan to work longer to boost my monthly benefit? How much longer? Would my benefit grow substantially because of those extra years of toil? I’d already paid the maximum Social Security payroll taxes for 15 years, thanks to the steady paychecks from my software engineering job. In my naïve thinking, if 15 years of payroll taxes got my primary insurance amount to, say, $1,500 a month, then each additional working year would proportionately increase the monthly amount by another $100 or so. As with most things, the answer turned out to be more nuanced. To illustrate, imagine a hypothetical worker named Fred who was born in 1960 and started his career at age 22. Throughout his working years, he earned enough to contribute the maximum annual Social Security tax. The accompanying chart shows Fred’s monthly primary insurance amounts if he stopped working at different ages. Notice that Fred gets nothing if he stops working before turning 32. That’s because it takes 10 years, or 40 quarters, of payroll tax contributions to be eligible for Social Security benefits. Also note the diminishing effect of Fred’s contributions on his benefits during the second half of his career. His benefit’s growth decelerates in his early 40s, and almost stops after age 57, even though he works five more years. Why are Fred’s later contributions less valuable—or outright ineffective—compared to those earlier in his career? The devil is in the details of the timing and amounts of Fred’s Social Security contributions. Fred’s annual contributions are indexed, or adjusted, to factor in wage growth over his working life. These indexed earnings are then combined over 35 years to calculate Fred’s average indexed monthly earnings. Think of this as Fred’s Social Security earnings averaged over 420 months, or 35 years of work. What if Fred worked fewer than 35 years? His earnings would still be averaged over 35 years, but with zeroes for the idle years when no taxes were paid. And if Fred worked for, say, 40 years, his lowest-paid five years would be dropped from the equation. This explains why Fred’s benefit barely budges after 57. If he keeps working, he’d be replacing lower-earning years with higher-earning years—but he’s credited with 35 years of work in either case. The difference between the two rates of pay isn’t significant enough to bump up his benefit much, particularly after the lower-earning years have been indexed for wage inflation. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] Once Social Security computes Fred’s average indexed monthly earnings, it then plugs that number into a three bracket system to calculate his benefit payment. In the first bracket, each dollar of his credited monthly earnings adds 90 cents to his benefit, up to $1,115. The second bracket adds 32 cents for each dollar of credited earnings between $1,115 and $6,721. The third bracket adds 15 cents for each dollar of credited earnings over $6,721. The idea behind these brackets is to favor the folks who’d probably need the benefits the most due to their lower lifetime income. For example, if Fred had a much lower-paying job, his benefits would be lower—but it would represent a much higher percentage of his working years’ wages. In my case, starting my benefits at my full retirement age of 67 would provide me with 100% of the primary insurance amount to which I’m entitled. I’d receive a monthly payment for the rest of my life, which could be passed along to my wife if she survives me, plus it’s increased annually to keep up with the cost of living. As sweet as all this sounds, 67 is not the age when I plan to claim. Waiting for my maximum benefit at age 70 seems like the wiser choice. My benefit would increase by 8% each year I delay claiming, plus annual cost-of-living adjustments will be added on top of that. I won’t be working until I’m 70, though. Like Fred, working longer would increase my benefits only marginally—certainly not the $100-a-month boost that I’d imagined. Grinding beyond a few more years for the sake of a minimally higher Social Security payout doesn’t seem appetizing. Waiting a little longer to claim, though, does seem palatable given the big gain in benefits that would result. Want to know where you stand? You can get an estimate of your benefits from Social Security’s online calculator. Sanjib Saha is a software engineer by profession, but he's now transitioning to early retirement. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is passionate about raising financial literacy and enjoys helping others with their finances. Check out his earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Six Seasons

AS A CHILD GROWING up in India, I was taught about the six seasons of Bengal: summer, monsoons, autumn, late autumn, winter and spring. From my recollection, some seasons felt distinct, while others were subtle and transitory. Still, each season had unique characteristics, making it different from the others. A HumbleDollar Voices question—if you could live your financial life again, what would you do differently?—reminded me of the six seasons. How so? Our financial life can also pass through as many as six seasons. I started my financial life with the idea that there were only two seasons: working years and retirement. If I’d recognized the six seasons beforehand and acted accordingly, I could’ve done much better with my most valuable asset—time. What are the six seasons of our financial life? 1. Summer: Financial learning. Bengali New Year starts with summer, arguably the most unpleasant season. Yet the hope of a new beginning overshadows the discomfort from heat and humidity. Similarly, we often start our adult financial life with an occasional stumble and fall. But the thrill of independence trumps any hardships. This is a period to make financial mistakes and learn from them. To explore and settle on a career path. To find a partner and plan a family. The shorter this season, the better. Those who manage to jumpstart their wealth building—saving for housing and retirement—have better odds of enjoying the seasons that follow. 2. Monsoons: Full-throttle saving. The rainy season in Bengal is disruptive. Growing up, I used to hate getting stranded at home because of heavy rain or waterlogging. Instead of playing outside or being with my friends, I had to study or do chores. On the bright side, the extra focus on studies lightened the academic pressure for the rest of the year. The second season in our financial life comes almost as abruptly. We focus mostly on career advancement and earning money, rather than recreation and personal enjoyment. Overwhelming financial responsibilities—for family and housing—force us to reduce waste and streamline spending. Our savings rate rises sharply. 3. Autumn: Slower accumulation. The autumn is highlighted by the festival of Durga Puja, the most enjoyable time of the year for most Bengalis. People slow down to soak up the celebratory mood. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] The third season in financial life feels the same way. A lifestyle of all work and no play seems unappealing. Our focus tilts away from the career rat race and toward family and other priorities. It isn’t uncommon to scale back career aspirations and make more time for children, or to give up a job altogether to care for an elderly family member. We still earn enough to save a bit toward future financial goals. But we also make a conscious choice to value life outside of work, even when it means less income. 4. Late Autumn: Financial security. Depending on how the prior seasons have turned out, there’s a good chance we can dial back work even further and earn just enough for ongoing living expenses. When can we do this? First, near-term financial needs, such as college education for the kids, must be funded by now. Second, enough must already be saved toward our future financial goals for compounding to take care of the rest. For instance, retirement accounts must have a reasonable balance and enough time to grow before they are tapped. To be clear, we’d still be financially dependent on our jobs during this season, even if we don’t especially like our work. Though we don’t care much about saving anymore, we still need a minimum income to pay the bills. Getting to this stage is when we begin to feel financially secure. How? We know that we have enough for the future, and thus we can choose to spend more time on personal and family interests. 5. Winter: Financial independence. My childhood friends and I used to look forward to the winter months. It was not only the time for school holidays, but also for the seasonal savors. Similarly, we all look forward to financial independence. We may not be wealthy, but we’ve met our financial obligations to others and ourselves. Debts are either paid off or accounted for. Our nest egg is larger and we no longer fear tapping it. We can now choose either to stop working or to work only for enjoyment and supplemental income. From now on, our time is ours. 6. Spring: Conventional retirement. The king of seasons is aptly called the golden age of financial life. Withdrawals from our nest egg may fall as we become eligible for Social Security, Medicare and any other retirement benefits. On the flip side, this final season involves some unique uncertainties. There’s longevity risk, unexpected health issues, and the possible loss of a partner and dependence on others. Still, it’s the season to reflect and be thankful for life’s diverse experiences. Sanjib Saha is a software engineer by profession, but he's now transitioning to early retirement. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is passionate about raising financial literacy and enjoys helping others with their finances. Check out his earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Tax Bites

MY TAXES ROSE 50% in 2021. I've never paid so much before, not even during my peak earning years. I’m not upset about having to pay my fair share, but the extent of the increase puzzled me. After examining my tax return, I came away with a handful of insights. To be sure, I wasn't expecting a large refund. The reason: I suspected that a onetime employment windfall would cause me to owe money, so I withheld more taxes during the year. I wanted to avoid an underpayment penalty at all costs. While the workplace windfall and some employer stock vesting contributed to higher taxes, I made moves in my taxable brokerage account that increased the pain. I had rebalanced my portfolio in early 2020 to take advantage of the stock market swoon. The market recovered and soon my stock allocation exceeded my target portfolio percentage. I trimmed my stock holdings in 2021 to get them back to an acceptable size. Many of the stocks I sold last year had risen in value, so rebalancing increased my capital gains for the year. I’m not much bothered by that. Regular rebalancing is part of my investment process, and this was the expected result. Here’s where the unexpected happened: I invested the rebalancing proceeds in a short-term inflation-indexed Treasury ETF. I wasn’t planning on much income from this investment, thanks to the chronically low interest rate. But soaring inflation changed the dynamic, boosting the value of inflation-indexed Treasurys—and leading the fund to distribute a large sum that was taxed at the ordinary income rate. The most unexpected surprise came from capital gains distributions in my ETF portfolio. Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETF (symbol: VIGI), for example, distributed more than 6% of its net asset value in capital gains. Half of those gains were short term, so they were taxed at the ordinary income rate. It was an unfriendly reminder that the vaunted tax-efficiency of ETFs isn’t guaranteed. To prepare for the taxes we might face, we can keep a close eye on our portfolio. Our brokerage statements will list the dividends and interest we receive. Fund company websites will tell us what size distributions to expect. Sound like too much work? Alternatively, you might keep a little extra cash on hand—just in case you owe money when you file.
Read more »

Taking Shelter

EARLIER THIS YEAR, I swapped the Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (symbol: VBIPX) in my 401(k) for an inflation-indexed Treasury ETF (VTIP). The trade worked out well: The replacement fund has since fared better, thanks to this year’s accelerating inflation. To buy the inflation-indexed ETF, I had to open a brokerage subaccount within my company’s retirement plan—a feature some 401(k)s offer, though these “brokerage windows” typically aren’t heavily promoted for fear employees will end up trading too much. Initially, I didn’t think I’d use the subaccount for anything else. But I’ve come to realize that the flexibility to choose from thousands of securities in a tax-deferred account could come in handy. For instance, in my regular taxable account, I had bought income-producing funds that own real estate investment trusts (REITs). I like the generous dividends, but not the tax bill, even after the 20% deduction. I wish I owned these in my 401(k) subaccount instead. That way, I could defer the taxes, instead of footing the bill during my high-earning years. Another problem I often face: headaches caused by tax-loss harvesting. In the past, I’d sell an investment to book a loss and use the proceeds to buy a similar, but not substantially identical, investment to preserve my market exposure. I’d then look to switch back to the original investment after the 30-day wash-sale period. But if the temporary investment had gone up in the intervening period, often I’d be reluctant to reverse course. The reason: The short-term capital gain from the sale would partly negate the harvested tax loss. Result? I’d be stuck with the temporary fund indefinitely. Now, I can simply buy the temporary fund in the tax-deferred subaccount instead of my taxable account. Even if the temporary fund climbs in value, I can sell it after 30 days—with no taxes owed—and then buy back the original investment in my taxable account.
Read more »

Aging Well

LIKE MANY IMMIGRANTS living in the U.S., I regularly return to my hometown to visit family and friends. My trips to Kolkata are usually short and jam-packed, seeing not just contemporaries, but also the older generation, including aunts and uncles, my parents’ friends and my friends’ parents. My two recent visits—one last fall and the other this spring—were no exception, but I had mixed feelings this time. Most of the older generation are now in their 70s and early 80s, and two of them had passed away since my last pre-pandemic visit. I was happy to be able to catch up with the rest. But I was also saddened and surprised to find that, since my last visit, a few didn’t seem to be doing well emotionally, as if they’re struggling to find meaning in life. On the surface, health problems and mobility issues are to blame, but that alone doesn’t explain such a change within a few short years. With most of their family members or adult children living elsewhere, these folks have no one to lean on for day-to-day support. They resist getting professional in-home senior care services or moving to retirement communities. This mental block is cultural and emotional, not financial. Meanwhile, the rest of my older acquaintances seem to be having a great time in their golden years. They, too, face health and mobility issues, but these don’t appear to affect their positive outlook on life. The best example is my maternal aunt—my mother’s younger sister—whom I call Mashi. Despite dealing with several family tragedies within the past year, including losing her husband of 50 years after a long period of ill-health, Mashi remains upbeat and full of energy. If you were to guess her age based on appearance and activities, you’d probably be off by at least 10 years. What’s the secret to the higher life satisfaction of these older folks? I’m not sure about the others, but for Mashi, I can think of six factors: 1. Keeping busy with a purpose. I’ve never seen Mashi sitting idle and wondering what to do with her spare time. Words like sedentary and lazy don’t exist in her dictionary. Even at this age, she still feels responsible for the smooth running and upkeep of her household, which includes her younger son and his family, who live with her. Mashi’s younger son—my cousin—is a doctor, his wife also has a career, and they have a four-year-old son who started kindergarten last year. Both my cousin and his wife assist with the household’s upkeep as best they can, and there’s also domestic help for certain chores. Still, Mashi is deeply involved with the remaining day-to-day work. It’s almost as if the household would cease to function if she were away for even a short time. 2. Nurturing relationships. Mashi makes a big effort to stay connected with all of her family and close friends—the quality I admire most about her. Her daily routine includes spending a few hours with her grandson, chitchatting with neighbors, talking to her older son’s family—they live abroad—and catching up with my mother over the phone. She’s also regularly in touch with her late husband’s extended family and friends. She rarely misses social gatherings, be it a puja celebration with in-laws, birthdays or special events of friends and acquaintances. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"]  3. Healthy eating. Mashi has resisted today’s lifestyle of junk food and frequent dining out. To be sure, she’s curious about food and doesn’t mind other cuisines for a change. But her staple meals involve homemade food with fresh vegetables, legumes and grains, plenty of fish and occasionally eggs or meat. She loves to make traditional Bengali dishes with seasonal vegetables. Whenever I visit her, I enjoy tasting what she’s making that day. 4. Regular physical exercise. No, Mashi doesn’t go to a health club, swimming pool or any fitness center. Instead, she gets her physical exercise simply by choosing to walk whenever she needs to go anywhere within a one-mile radius. She finds one excuse or another every day to get out of the house for a brisk walk. Often, the trip involves getting fresh vegetables and groceries from the neighborhood bazaars, picking up monthly provisions from convenience stores, buying a gift for an upcoming family event, or paying a visit to her in-laws who live close by. Even the pandemic lockdown didn’t change her walking habit. 5. Personal time. Despite a busy daily life, Mashi sets aside time to relax. Her favorite hobby is gardening. Living in a congested city, she doesn’t have the luxury of a backyard garden. Instead, she uses her home’s two terraces to grow a variety of plants in pots of various sizes. The small terrace on the second floor doesn’t get much sunlight, and the one on the fourth floor has no shade. She regularly moves pots between the terraces, prunes and weeds them, and treats the soil with tea leaves. According to her, looking after her plants is the most relaxing part of her day. 6. Financial security. Mashi doesn’t come across as wealthy, but she’s financially comfortable, thanks to a lifetime pension, retirement savings left by my late uncle and a decent-sized house. Both her sons are capable of offering financial support, but I doubt she’d ever need or ask for help. She can afford to spend beyond her regular expenses without worrying about outliving her money. Mashi is in her 70s, but—given that she’s hardly changed since her early 60s—I have a feeling that she’ll be the same in her 80s, too. Sanjib Saha is a software engineer by profession, but he's now transitioning to early retirement. Self-taught in investments, he passed the Series 65 licensing exam as a non-industry candidate. Sanjib is passionate about raising financial literacy and enjoys helping others with their finances. Check out his earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Goodbye DIY

I GREW UP IN INDIA. There, it’s quite common to have outside help for household chores. Most middle-class families hire someone to help with washing, dishes and cleaning. Affluent households typically have a cook, driver and housekeeper. After coming to the U.S., I noticed that most households weren’t dependent on domestic help, thanks to appliances like a dishwasher, vacuum cleaner and washer-dryer. A few coworkers went as far as building their own cabinets and decks, painting their homes and changing the oil in the car. This do-it-yourself culture resonated with me for three reasons. First, I valued independence—the ability to do things at my own pace, rather than waiting on someone else. Second, the idea of working equally hard at work and at home gave me a kick. Third, it appealed to my sense of frugality. I wanted to be like my DIY coworkers. But it was wishful thinking on my part. I tried various home maintenance jobs that required no special tools or expertise. But I didn’t especially enjoy fixing toilets, repairing garage doors, blowing leaves or mowing lawns. These mundane tasks felt increasingly burdensome. Still, the idea of getting outside help was at odds with my values. I’d no longer be the independent, hardworking and frugal person I perceived myself to be. But in truth, I was being stupid and stingy. If I could afford it, why not pay someone to do these unexciting chores? Reluctantly, I availed myself of yardwork and housecleaning services, but I still resisted offloading anything else. That changed when I cut back the number of hours I worked. How did a smaller paycheck motivate me to spend more for domestic help? My reasoning was simple. With my part-time job, I was effectively paying back a prorated percentage of my fulltime salary to my employer, so I could have a few extra hours for myself. If my personal time was as valuable as that pay cut, it made no sense to spend it on uninteresting tasks that someone else could do for an even smaller price.
Read more »