FREE NEWSLETTER

Many folks lead lives of turmoil and pain and yet, ever resilient, they get up the next morning and go to work.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Six Months In! (from Dana/DrLefty)

"Dana, this is a very refreshing post. You sure are in a good place, whatever you decide to take on is now on your own terms. And no more work related politics! Will your husband be working on any new music after October 1?"
- Dan Smith
Read more »

Share This Message

"People in crisis need support, and I wonder how often families are told about PACE (Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly)? All Senior Care Educators should know! It is a combined Federal and State program to provide qualified frail seniors with comprehensive medical and social services to maintain community living. Comprehensive services include coordination of care from primary care, dental care, hearing aids, vision care to specialist care, drug coverage and med administration, home care, transportation to appointments, home safety survey, drug and even meal delivery, occupational and physical therapy as needed, social work assistance, family respite care, and hospice care at the end. Medicare and Medicaid pay the whole cost at a capitation rate to the PACE organizations. PACE organization takes over ALL obligations of Medicare and Medicaid. It often covers long-term custodial nursing home care. (Medicaid is not a requirement, but pro-rated share costs apply)."
- quan nguyen
Read more »

One Less Resolution for 2026!

"Regardless of where the indexes are, why put it off? Sounds like a well-considered plan."
- Michael1
Read more »

At what age did travel start feeling like work—and what changed your plan?

"48 National Parks. Now that's a real accomplishment Rob. In June of 2024, I managed to make it to Capulon Volcano NM, Great Sand Dunes, Yellowstone, Grand Teton, and Great Basin NPs on a drive from Mobile, AL to Cody, WY, and then on to Oakland, CA. I think Great Basin NP is an underrated gem. The drive across U. S. Hwy 50 (The Loneliest Road in America), through Nevada, is spectacular."
- Patrick Brennan
Read more »

Trust – The reason I read HumbleDollar

"This article appeared in the recirculation; glad it did. I'm also on the distribution list from collabfund.com and enjoy their articles from Morgan Housel and others, such as Ted Lamade."
- Olin
Read more »

Real vs. Imaginary Returns – Part I

"It doesn't matter in the long term: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bogleheads/comments/1q1fy9m/vti_or_voo_is_a_choice_that_truly_doesnt_matter/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button"
- Kenyon Ralph
Read more »

Can a budget do all that?

"Asking? Did anyone read what I wrote. ”recognize a budget doesn’t do any of the things often attributed to it, it doesn’t do anything. Doing or not doing something is up to the individual…including sticking to a budget🤑”"
- R Quinn
Read more »

2026 Financial Plan

LOOKING TO UPDATE your financial plan for 2026? Below are ten strategies you might consider: Gaining control January is a good time to audit your investments. I’d start with this very basic step: If you have accounts at multiple brokerage firms, see if you can consolidate them. This won’t necessarily lead to better investment results, but if you have fewer accounts, it’ll be easier to monitor and to manage them. This might not seem like an important exercise, but in my experience, investors often find long-forgotten investments, overpriced funds or unintended cash balances when they conduct an investment clean-up like this.  View from the top The most common question investors asked in 2025 was some version of, “With the market so high, should we get more defensive?” To make this determination, I suggest looking at your portfolio through two lenses. First, total up the dollars you hold in relatively stable assets, including bonds and cash, then assess that relative to your cash needs over the next several years. That’s the first lens, and it’s what I might call the “calculator answer,” but it’s incomplete on its own. Of equal importance is to ask how you would feel if the stock market dropped. To answer this question, total up how much you hold in stocks and ask how it would affect you if you saw that number cut in half. While a 50% decline is a low likelihood at any given time, declines of that magnitude have occurred more than once, so it’s the rule of thumb I suggest. Looking forward The stock market in 2025 was a roller coaster. Early in the year, it dropped nearly 20%, but by year-end, it had gained nearly 20%. As we turn our attention to 2026, what should investors expect? On this question, Benjamin Graham offered this useful advice: “In the short run,” he wrote, “the market is a voting machine, but in the long run it is a weighing machine.” Anything could happen this year, in other words. But over longer time periods, it’s logical to expect the market to follow corporate profits higher. That’s Graham’s weighing machine. And that’s why, whatever the news of the day happens to be in 2026, we shouldn’t let short-term fluctuations shake our faith in the long term. Past and present Staying focused on the long term is sometimes easier said than done. That’s why I recommend this thought experiment: Imagine going back in time to January 2016. How many of the events we’ve experienced over the past decade—from the pandemic to wars to unexpected election results—could any of us have predicted? The reality is that it’s very difficult to know which way things will go. Even when a trend seems to point decisively in one direction, we should be careful to never bet too heavily on any particular outcome. As British economist Elroy Dimson has noted, “more things can happen than will happen.” For that reason, the ideal portfolio, in my view, is one that wouldn’t vary too much in response to short-term news. A tough task There’s a story about Benjamin Graham that tells us a lot about the wisdom of picking stocks. One day in 1926, Graham was reading through a company’s financial statements when he spotted what he thought might be an opportunity. To be sure, though, he had to take a train to Washington and sift through data available only at the office of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Graham confirmed it to be an almost no-lose situation, but it was one that other investors had overlooked because the information was so inaccessible. But today, that sort of information would be readily available online. That, in my view, makes stock-picking much more of an uphill battle than it was in Graham’s day, 100 years ago. The most recent data point: In 2025, nearly three-quarters of actively-managed funds trailed their benchmarks. Clear math In a 1991 essay titled “The Arithmetic of Active Management,” Stanford professor William Sharpe made this simple observation: “…it must be the case that (1) before costs, the return on the average actively managed dollar will equal the return on the average passively managed dollar and (2) after costs, the return on the average actively managed dollar will be less than the return on the average passively managed dollar [because actively-managed funds are usually more expensive].” Actively-managed funds are at a structural disadvantage, in other words. And according to a December analysis by Morningstar’s Jeff Ptak, this dynamic has only gotten stronger in recent years. “Fees appear to have gotten even more predictive,” he wrote. Worthwhile switch These days, a growing number of mutual funds are allowing shareholders to convert their holdings to equivalent ETF shares. If you have the opportunity to convert mutual fund shares you own, I recommend it, for two reasons. First, ETF fees are usually lower. Of more significance, ETFs are inherently more tax-efficient. While both mutual funds and ETFs are required to distribute income out pro rata to shareholders, ETFs usually incur fewer capital gains because they allow for “in kind” redemptions, which don’t require fund managers to liquidate holdings. Second best You may have read about new rules that’ll allow 401(k) accounts to invest in private funds. Are these a good idea? While every fund is different, author William Bernstein offers a perspective I find helpful: “The first people who invested in private equity got the filet mignon and the lobster tails, and the Vanguards and Fidelities of this world are going to wind up with tuna noodle casserole.” That isn’t a rule, but in my opinion, it may be more true than not. “Why” investments Some private funds convert to being publicly-traded. Are these a good idea? The Wall Street Journal’s Jason Zweig discussed this recently. These funds, he observed, “cast doubt on Wall Street’s narrative that investors can have their cake and eat it, too. You can have the mild price fluctuations of nontraded assets, or you can have access to your money whenever you want—but it’s turning out that you can’t have both.” Down the road, these funds might become reasonable investments, but they fit into an investment category I call “Why?” If you can earn reasonable returns with simpler, more proven types of funds, why take risk with something new and unproven? All sides A key challenge in investment decision-making is the fact that each of us tends to have our own way of looking at things. Some are more quantitative while others are more qualitative. Some are more aggressive while others are more cautious. And so on. That’s a problem because financial decisions usually require a blend of perspectives. That’s why I recommend a “five minds” approach to financial questions. Instead of coming at a question from only one direction, consider how an optimist, a pessimist, an analyst, an economist and a psychologist might look at that question. Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.  
Read more »

Capital Gains Planning

THE IRS RECENTLY announced inflation adjustments for the tax year 2026. 2 quick changes:
  1. Standard deduction
For single taxpayers, the standard deduction rises to $16,100 for 2026, an increase of $350 from 2025. For married couples filing jointly, the standard deduction rises to $32,200, an increase of $700 from tax year 2025.
  1. Capital Gains Rates
For single taxpayers, long-term capital gains are taxed at 0% if the taxable income is up to $49,450 ($98,900 for married couples filing jointly). Note: Brackets are based on taxable income, not gross. Tax planning with capital gains Using the 0% long-term capital gains rate can be a good way to minimize your tax bill and retire early. For an investment to qualify as long-term, you must hold it for more than a year. For example, say Bob is single, did fairly well financially in his early years, and decided to retire at 50. He paid off his home and needs $65,000 per year to live on. He sells $65,000 worth of Vanguard ETFs (say $5,000 was the basis he originally bought it for). Here’s how his tax return would look: $60,000 of long-term capital gains ($5,000 is the cost basis for his original investment) -$16,100 standard deduction = $43,900 taxable income Since the taxable income is below $49,450, all of this income will be taxed at 0% on the federal level (assuming no other income sources). Using the 0% tax rate on capital gains could be a great strategy to sustain your early retirement until age 59 ½. Additionally, these brackets are adjusted for inflation each year, so if you need $62,000 due to inflation next year, it will likely match the new brackets. Importantly, the $16,100 standard deduction amount (or $32,200 if married filing jointly) can come from any income source. In most cases, it’s actually better to utilize something like an IRA withdrawal or pre-tax 401k to “fill” that income. For example, Bob could use a Section 72(t), series of substantially equal periodic payments, to withdraw $16,100 from his IRA without a 10% penalty. Then, he can withdraw less from a brokerage account to fill the remaining income. However, by using a 72(t) plan, Bob will need to continue withdrawing this amount until age 59.  Note that tax law could change the numbers. While the OBBBA just made the standard permanent, another law could change that. Also, capital gains tax brackets could technically change too.  Additional opportunities to lower tax A good friend of mine is going back to school to get his MBA. He did very well financially, so he will live off savings with no income. This is a perfect opportunity for him to sell stocks in his brokerage account, pay $0 in federal taxes, and immediately buy back the exact same stocks.  Why? Say he bought 100 shares of VTI 10 years ago for $100 per share. Total cost basis is $10,000. Now, it’s worth $335 per share. If he sells 100 VTI shares, he will have ($335 - $100) * 100 = $25,500 in capital gains. Now, my friend will pay $0 in federal taxes on these gains and will buy back those same VTI shares for $335 per share. What this allows him to do is increase the cost basis on those shares from $100 per share to $335 per share, so the next time he sells, his cost basis is much higher (lower capital gains). Note: there is no wash sale on a gain. It only applies to a loss. This only works if you qualify for the 0% long-term capital gains rate on that initial sale. So, any time you have a low-income year or take extended time off from work, it could be a good time to analyze your portfolio.  Additionally, he can also use Roth conversions instead, but amounts will be smaller if he wants to stay in the 0% tax bracket. Additional consideration: 1. State Tax It’s important to take state taxes into consideration. For example, that $25,500 of capital gains could cost $1,275 in state taxes (assuming a 5% tax rate). It’s generally not worth harvesting gains if state tax applies. This is because you may lose more by not being able to invest the state tax than you save by avoiding federal tax, especially if you plan it right in the long term.  However, some states have no tax on capital gains. For example, Texas and Florida are among the states with no income tax (and no capital gains tax) 2. Increased Income Sometimes a higher income can reduce available itemized deductions (e.g. medical expense deductions are based on AGI) or impact other credits (e.g. the Retirement Savings Credit). It’s important to analyze the full impact based on your unique situation. Have you used the 0% long-term capital gains bracket to retire early? Share your thoughts in the comments!   Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.
Read more »

Distance from family: inconvenience…or a financial planning blind spot?

"Good one. I had a life lesson in most of this starting 30 years ago as an only child and grandchild living in another state. That 12-year lesson of managing care, visits, finances, support, government rules, nursing homes, real-estate transactions, wills, estates and lots more, provided the impetus and some of the knowledge and experience that has been useful in planning for my wife and I. The first two questions are financial and the answer is we did not dive into detailed budgeting, but we did is work long and hard and save so that we have a reasonable war chest. Yes we did buy traditional LTCI in our 50s and yes we went on the waiting list for 4 CCRCs in our 60s. I feel like we are pretty well prepared. We also are investing in our health to increase our healthspan-my hope is to extend the Go-Go years right through our 70s! We'll see, I turn 70 this year!"
- Rob Jennings
Read more »

The Distance: Time Grinds On

""Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way." A central tension between an elderly and caring families is the balance between autonomy and safety: it is all over the map and it moves in time. Here's a map of the Safety - Autonomy grid."
- quan nguyen
Read more »

Six Months In! (from Dana/DrLefty)

"Dana, this is a very refreshing post. You sure are in a good place, whatever you decide to take on is now on your own terms. And no more work related politics! Will your husband be working on any new music after October 1?"
- Dan Smith
Read more »

Share This Message

"People in crisis need support, and I wonder how often families are told about PACE (Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly)? All Senior Care Educators should know! It is a combined Federal and State program to provide qualified frail seniors with comprehensive medical and social services to maintain community living. Comprehensive services include coordination of care from primary care, dental care, hearing aids, vision care to specialist care, drug coverage and med administration, home care, transportation to appointments, home safety survey, drug and even meal delivery, occupational and physical therapy as needed, social work assistance, family respite care, and hospice care at the end. Medicare and Medicaid pay the whole cost at a capitation rate to the PACE organizations. PACE organization takes over ALL obligations of Medicare and Medicaid. It often covers long-term custodial nursing home care. (Medicaid is not a requirement, but pro-rated share costs apply)."
- quan nguyen
Read more »

One Less Resolution for 2026!

"Regardless of where the indexes are, why put it off? Sounds like a well-considered plan."
- Michael1
Read more »

At what age did travel start feeling like work—and what changed your plan?

"48 National Parks. Now that's a real accomplishment Rob. In June of 2024, I managed to make it to Capulon Volcano NM, Great Sand Dunes, Yellowstone, Grand Teton, and Great Basin NPs on a drive from Mobile, AL to Cody, WY, and then on to Oakland, CA. I think Great Basin NP is an underrated gem. The drive across U. S. Hwy 50 (The Loneliest Road in America), through Nevada, is spectacular."
- Patrick Brennan
Read more »

Trust – The reason I read HumbleDollar

"This article appeared in the recirculation; glad it did. I'm also on the distribution list from collabfund.com and enjoy their articles from Morgan Housel and others, such as Ted Lamade."
- Olin
Read more »

Real vs. Imaginary Returns – Part I

"It doesn't matter in the long term: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bogleheads/comments/1q1fy9m/vti_or_voo_is_a_choice_that_truly_doesnt_matter/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button"
- Kenyon Ralph
Read more »

Can a budget do all that?

"Asking? Did anyone read what I wrote. ”recognize a budget doesn’t do any of the things often attributed to it, it doesn’t do anything. Doing or not doing something is up to the individual…including sticking to a budget🤑”"
- R Quinn
Read more »

2026 Financial Plan

LOOKING TO UPDATE your financial plan for 2026? Below are ten strategies you might consider: Gaining control January is a good time to audit your investments. I’d start with this very basic step: If you have accounts at multiple brokerage firms, see if you can consolidate them. This won’t necessarily lead to better investment results, but if you have fewer accounts, it’ll be easier to monitor and to manage them. This might not seem like an important exercise, but in my experience, investors often find long-forgotten investments, overpriced funds or unintended cash balances when they conduct an investment clean-up like this.  View from the top The most common question investors asked in 2025 was some version of, “With the market so high, should we get more defensive?” To make this determination, I suggest looking at your portfolio through two lenses. First, total up the dollars you hold in relatively stable assets, including bonds and cash, then assess that relative to your cash needs over the next several years. That’s the first lens, and it’s what I might call the “calculator answer,” but it’s incomplete on its own. Of equal importance is to ask how you would feel if the stock market dropped. To answer this question, total up how much you hold in stocks and ask how it would affect you if you saw that number cut in half. While a 50% decline is a low likelihood at any given time, declines of that magnitude have occurred more than once, so it’s the rule of thumb I suggest. Looking forward The stock market in 2025 was a roller coaster. Early in the year, it dropped nearly 20%, but by year-end, it had gained nearly 20%. As we turn our attention to 2026, what should investors expect? On this question, Benjamin Graham offered this useful advice: “In the short run,” he wrote, “the market is a voting machine, but in the long run it is a weighing machine.” Anything could happen this year, in other words. But over longer time periods, it’s logical to expect the market to follow corporate profits higher. That’s Graham’s weighing machine. And that’s why, whatever the news of the day happens to be in 2026, we shouldn’t let short-term fluctuations shake our faith in the long term. Past and present Staying focused on the long term is sometimes easier said than done. That’s why I recommend this thought experiment: Imagine going back in time to January 2016. How many of the events we’ve experienced over the past decade—from the pandemic to wars to unexpected election results—could any of us have predicted? The reality is that it’s very difficult to know which way things will go. Even when a trend seems to point decisively in one direction, we should be careful to never bet too heavily on any particular outcome. As British economist Elroy Dimson has noted, “more things can happen than will happen.” For that reason, the ideal portfolio, in my view, is one that wouldn’t vary too much in response to short-term news. A tough task There’s a story about Benjamin Graham that tells us a lot about the wisdom of picking stocks. One day in 1926, Graham was reading through a company’s financial statements when he spotted what he thought might be an opportunity. To be sure, though, he had to take a train to Washington and sift through data available only at the office of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Graham confirmed it to be an almost no-lose situation, but it was one that other investors had overlooked because the information was so inaccessible. But today, that sort of information would be readily available online. That, in my view, makes stock-picking much more of an uphill battle than it was in Graham’s day, 100 years ago. The most recent data point: In 2025, nearly three-quarters of actively-managed funds trailed their benchmarks. Clear math In a 1991 essay titled “The Arithmetic of Active Management,” Stanford professor William Sharpe made this simple observation: “…it must be the case that (1) before costs, the return on the average actively managed dollar will equal the return on the average passively managed dollar and (2) after costs, the return on the average actively managed dollar will be less than the return on the average passively managed dollar [because actively-managed funds are usually more expensive].” Actively-managed funds are at a structural disadvantage, in other words. And according to a December analysis by Morningstar’s Jeff Ptak, this dynamic has only gotten stronger in recent years. “Fees appear to have gotten even more predictive,” he wrote. Worthwhile switch These days, a growing number of mutual funds are allowing shareholders to convert their holdings to equivalent ETF shares. If you have the opportunity to convert mutual fund shares you own, I recommend it, for two reasons. First, ETF fees are usually lower. Of more significance, ETFs are inherently more tax-efficient. While both mutual funds and ETFs are required to distribute income out pro rata to shareholders, ETFs usually incur fewer capital gains because they allow for “in kind” redemptions, which don’t require fund managers to liquidate holdings. Second best You may have read about new rules that’ll allow 401(k) accounts to invest in private funds. Are these a good idea? While every fund is different, author William Bernstein offers a perspective I find helpful: “The first people who invested in private equity got the filet mignon and the lobster tails, and the Vanguards and Fidelities of this world are going to wind up with tuna noodle casserole.” That isn’t a rule, but in my opinion, it may be more true than not. “Why” investments Some private funds convert to being publicly-traded. Are these a good idea? The Wall Street Journal’s Jason Zweig discussed this recently. These funds, he observed, “cast doubt on Wall Street’s narrative that investors can have their cake and eat it, too. You can have the mild price fluctuations of nontraded assets, or you can have access to your money whenever you want—but it’s turning out that you can’t have both.” Down the road, these funds might become reasonable investments, but they fit into an investment category I call “Why?” If you can earn reasonable returns with simpler, more proven types of funds, why take risk with something new and unproven? All sides A key challenge in investment decision-making is the fact that each of us tends to have our own way of looking at things. Some are more quantitative while others are more qualitative. Some are more aggressive while others are more cautious. And so on. That’s a problem because financial decisions usually require a blend of perspectives. That’s why I recommend a “five minds” approach to financial questions. Instead of coming at a question from only one direction, consider how an optimist, a pessimist, an analyst, an economist and a psychologist might look at that question. Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.  
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 31: WE SHOULD plan for returns below the historical averages. Today’s rich stock valuations and modest bond yields don’t guarantee low returns—but it’s prudent to assume that’s what we’ll get.

think

TRACKING ERROR. Even if our portfolio makes money in any given year, we may be disappointed if our results lag behind the market averages. Indeed, the less diversified we are, the less our portfolio’s performance will look like the market indexes—for better or worse. Want to reduce this tracking error? Favor funds that offer broad diversification.

humans

NO. 31: WE'RE OFTEN overly optimistic. Entrepreneurs will be bullish about their own prospects, even as they doubt the chances of others in the same business. Investors will declare great hope for their investments, and yet express grave concerns about the market in general. Optimists may be more likable—but pessimists often have a better grip on reality.

Truths

NO. 24: MANY financial mistakes can be traced to instincts we inherited from our hunter-gatherer ancestors, who survived because they worked hard, hunted for patterns, consumed whenever they could and greatly feared losses. Today, these instincts can lead us to trade too much, try to beat the market, overspend and panic during market declines.

Borrowing

Manifesto

NO. 31: WE SHOULD plan for returns below the historical averages. Today’s rich stock valuations and modest bond yields don’t guarantee low returns—but it’s prudent to assume that’s what we’ll get.

Spotlight: Life Events

I’ve stolen the words Willful Ignorance and Disengagement from a prior forum post.

“Hi, I’m Chris”. That’s how it all began in early 2002. My friend Dave and I were hanging out of a hole in the wall of my duplex, installing a new window. Chris was the good looking neighbor girl. She thought Dave and I were a couple, he was actually my best bud, living with me and providing his carpenter skills in lieu of rent during some hard times.
By the end of the year I and Chris were a couple,

Read more »

Three Significant Moments

I am a Baptist pastor.  Significant moment #1.  One day I was in a leadership meeting and a fellow pastor commented that he had just met with his financial advisor and was told he would have to work to age 81 to retire.  I didn’t laugh.  I was his age and had just lost 40% of my retirement from the economic downturn that began in October, 2007.  After that meeting I did some serious soul searching and decided I would become a student of understanding “money”

Read more »

Running on Empty

AT 75 YEARS OLD, I find myself living paycheck-to-paycheck. I now understand how that feels and how it can happen. But you can put away the violin: It’s only temporary.
Being fiscally conservative, I don’t like being in debt or having unpaid bills. I even pay credit cards before they are due—or I used to. Until a month ago, I paid all my bills, with considerable money left over at the end of each month.

Read more »

Did we do this all wrong?

Looking up at the ceiling recovering from major surgery has this 70+ boomer rethinking life. Everyone on here has an intense interest in personal finance. Most of us are boomers.  Our parents were the Greatest Generation who lived the Depression and fought the war then shared their stories of sacrifice. We’ve read the Wall Street Journal, especially when Jonathan was there, financial papers, magazines and websites galore. My guess is that our playbook is pretty much the same:  get an education,

Read more »

Never Stops Raining

SELLING A HOUSE should be easy. Hire a realtor, find a buyer, the realtor takes a percentage and it’s a done deal. If only.

Try this version instead. Before we could sell our house in 2020, we had to fix a list of defects, including power washing the roof, having a dead tree removed, digging up an already drained oil tank and tearing up the pavers in the driveway to get at the tank.

Read more »

A World Apart

WHEN WE MOVED to California from India in spring 2014, it was a culture shock—and not just because of the much higher standard of living. Financial life in the U.S. is very different. Here are just some of the surprises that my husband and I have encountered over the past seven years:
Health care. I remember walking into my first U.S. doctor’s appointment. I froze—unaware that I had to pay a $50 copay for each visit,

Read more »

Spotlight: Perry

A Basis for Decisions

I'VE WRITTEN BEFORE about harvesting tax losses and using them to offset the gains from selling other investments. We have a bit of a sprawling portfolio, with numerous small positions and lots of embedded capital gains. Gradually harvesting gains would simplify the portfolio and make it more tax-efficient. And if we do so during these early retirement years, while our income is low, and if we can partially offset those gains with realized losses, we should be able to harvest gains at low rates—and perhaps even pay 0% in capital gains taxes. But should we sell? Lately, I’ve come to realize that—from a long-term tax perspective—it may be better to leave the gains alone, especially since we’re residents of a community property state. Living in such a state may also argue for combining individual taxable accounts into joint accounts. There are nine community property states: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin. The other 41 are separate property states. In a community property state, all property accumulated during a marriage is considered the property of both partners. This is a key consideration in a divorce and the resulting division of assets. But it also has important implications for investment and estate planning. As many readers know, when the owner of property dies, that owner’s heirs get a step-up in cost basis on inherited property that’s held outside a retirement account. For example, if I bought a vacation home for $300,000 that’s worth $500,000 today, I would have a $200,000 capital gain if I sold it. Likewise, if I bought 1,000 shares of ABC company at $100 a share and they’re now at $150, I’d have a capital gain of $50,000 if I sold today. But if I wake up today planning to sell but instead die before doing so, my heirs inherit the house and the stock at today’s value. Result? When they sell, their cost basis will be today’s value, not my original cost basis. This step-up means the gains between my purchase and my death go untaxed. As you can imagine, on assets held for many years, this can be a huge tax savings. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] The above is true regardless of whether one lives in a community property state or not. Here’s where the state of residence comes into play: In a community property state, assuming my heir is my spouse, the step-up occurs not only on property owned by me, but also on the full value of property we own jointly. How does this work? Let’s say that, in addition to the shares of ABC company I own in my taxable account, my spouse owns shares of XYZ company in hers. Since those shares are in her own individual account, she gets no step-up on XYZ when I die. Instead, I would get a step-up when she dies. But let’s say we held both these stocks in a joint account. In most states, the step-up in the joint account would be limited to 50% of each position. But in a community property state, the surviving spouse would get a full step-up on both holdings. In the individual taxable brokerage accounts that my wife and I own separately, we have significant capital gains, so—from an estate planning perspective—it makes sense to combine them into a joint account or to change the account registration on both accounts to make them joint. That way, when either of us dies, the survivor gets a full step-up on everything outside our retirement accounts. It could also simplify the portfolio a bit. What are the possible downsides of combining accounts? Both parties will have full control of all assets. If this is a concern for you, you probably shouldn’t do it. You’d lose the cybersecurity benefit that comes with having assets housed in accounts with separate login credentials. Moving to a separate property state later means you’d no longer get the full step-up on jointly held assets. It would complicate a potential divorce and might mean surrendering greater wealth than you otherwise would. For us, combining accounts seems like a good idea for the larger step-up alone. If we did so, we might choose to forgo realizing capital gains during our low-income years, knowing that there will eventually be a step-up on everything. Instead, we could use these low-income years to maximize Roth conversions. Michael Perry is a former career Army officer and external affairs executive for a Fortune 100 company. In addition to personal finance and investing, his interests include reading, traveling, being outdoors, strength training and coaching, and cocktails. Check out his earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Retirement on the Road

WE'VE BEEN TAKING stock of our nomadic life. We’re quite happy living as we are. But we’re also conscious that things could change at any time for multiple reasons, and we’re ready to shift gears if needed. We aren’t exactly “living the dream”—because being nomadic was never our dream. We hadn’t even thought about it until a few months before we started our travels. We officially uprooted ourselves—meaning we sold our Houston home—after we’d been away from the place for most of the first year of my retirement. We didn’t want to stay where we were, but we also didn’t have a place we wanted to move. Now, as we enter our third year as nomads, we’re thinking of making at least a few smaller changes to our itinerant lifestyle. Complaints? I have a few. But then again… (sorry, Mr. Sinatra). I miss my kettlebells, and it’s hard to maintain my certified instructor standards without heavier ones, which you can’t find in most gyms. My wife is an amazing cook and enjoys it, but it’s less enjoyable when a kitchen has crummy pans and knives, plus she has her own fitness goals that are difficult to achieve when bouncing among whatever gyms are available, if any. It’s also a challenge for us to eat properly when dealing with different kitchens and different stores, especially so when you throw in certain dietary requirements. To be fair, we’ve been able to enjoy some impressive kitchens and gyms. Still, inconsistent eating and fitness are our biggest day-to-day concerns. I realize these will strike some as minor issues, but people are different and, for us, such things are important. We’ll often go out of our way and pay more than usual for short-term access to a good gym or for the food that we need or want. We rent a storage unit in Texas that we haven’t seen since we filled it, and it’s become a subject of frequent discussions. Hurricane Beryl nudged us toward action when it caused our storage facility to lose power for an extended period. When we go back to the U.S. in early 2025 to see our parents, we’ll grudgingly make time to go to the storage unit… and do something. Our options range from further downsizing to a full or partial move of our belongings to Virginia, near where we store our car. On the other hand, we might soon find we’ve wasted time and money moving things we must move again or, alternatively, that we got rid of things we wish we still had. This used to be a mental obstacle to action, but we’ve gotten over it. Whatever we decide won’t be perfect, but it’ll hopefully improve the situation and we’ll stop talking about the storage unit for a while. So far, these things aren’t enough to make us settle down. But we have been thinking about being in one location for a longer period. Since we started this journey in late 2022, we haven’t been in one place longer than five weeks. Let me tell you that, even if you only have a carry-on and a backpack, unpacking for five weeks is quite a treat, and three to six months has some real attraction. It would be nice to be somewhere long enough to become part of a community and develop a routine that’ll last for a little while, even if it’s not necessarily where we plan to spend years. Would we move some of our things out of storage? Who knows? But for a several months’ stay, we wouldn’t be beyond buying things we need and donating them when it’s time to move on. Where would we go? This is another frequent topic of discussion. We like England a lot and can stay in the UK for up to six months on a tourist visa. I’m partial to Italy and speak the language, but a tourist visa there will only get us three months. We haven’t found that many places in the U.S. where we’re excited to stay a long time, but that’s partially because so much of our travel has been out of the country. For no particular reason, some places in the U.S. that were once on the short list for our future home don’t hold the same appeal they once did. We sometimes think about buying property, possibly to use as a base for a couple of months each year and possibly just as an investment. That said, we don’t keep a lot of cash or bonds in our taxable accounts, waiting for a home purchase that may never happen. Buying would almost certainly entail selling stocks in those accounts. We’d be ready to do this, even if the market were down, as we could offset this with a shift into stocks in our tax-protected accounts. This could apply not only to buying property, but also to any other eventuality that suddenly required us to spend significant cash. Because of the inherent uncertainty in our lives, we value flexibility in our finances. Our next few months of travel and expenses are usually predictable, even though locations are changing, but we don’t know what we don’t know. A medical emergency or a serious health diagnosis could mean a move at short notice to get care. It would be a place that isn’t home, nor necessarily a town we know or where we have a circle of friends. More likely than not, we’d initially deal with the situation outside the U.S. Likewise, a serious family situation might provoke a similar sudden move. With both of us around age 60, living in unfamiliar surroundings, and with four parents in their 80s, this is not an insignificant consideration. We’re thankful that, as we consider possible changes, our current motivation to make those changes isn’t health, family or financial problems, or because there’s some necessity we’re missing. Rather, it’s the desire for more of certain things that aren’t necessities, but which are important to us. That said, we also enjoy novelty and exploration. If we were to settle into a routine and a community, even if we enjoyed it, I suspect we’d want to shake up our lives occasionally. We like our lifestyle and we’re happy, and we recognize that the ability to enjoy it is a gift. Michael Perry is a former career Army officer and external affairs executive for a Fortune 100 company. In addition to personal finance and investing, his interests include reading, traveling, being outdoors, strength training and coaching, and cocktails. Check out his earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Getting to Zero

AFTER YOU QUIT the workforce and before you start Social Security, you may find yourself with little or no taxable income. As many financial experts have pointed out, this can be a great time to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth and pay taxes at a relatively low rate. But here’s another tax-savings opportunity to consider: If you have winning stocks and funds in your regular taxable account, this period can also offer the chance to realize long-term gains and pay taxes at a 0% federal rate. The key: Keep your taxable income low, including paying attention to capital gains distributions from your mutual funds. Those distributions may leave you with less room to realize gains at a 0% rate. How might this work in practice? Let’s take the example of Bob and Jane, a retired couple not yet receiving Social Security. They collect a $30,000 annual pension. In 2020, their taxable investments produced $2,000 in interest, $10,000 in qualified dividends and $10,000 in long-term capital gains fund distributions. Assuming these numbers are the same this year, Bob and Jane would be looking at $52,000 in total income. Result: They could intentionally realize another $53,900 in long-term capital gains, bringing their total income to $105,900—and pay nothing in capital gains taxes. If they take that $105,900 and subtract a married couple’s $25,100 standard deduction, they would be left with taxable income of $80,800. (The figures for those filing as single individuals would be half these levels.) As long as their total taxable income doesn’t breach that $80,800 threshold, any long-term capital gains—whether distributed by their mutual funds or the result of selling winning investments—would be taxed at 0%. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] A key problem: It’s highly unlikely that Bob and Jane’s numbers are going to be the same this year as in 2020, and most can’t be known in advance. Yes, the pension amount is probably fixed, but it’s harder to know precisely how much in interest and dividends they’ll receive during the year, and next to impossible to know what capital gains will be paid out by their mutual funds. Still, they can anticipate 2021’s numbers will be at least somewhat similar to 2020’s, and then finetune their calculations closer to year-end. Here’s what they’ll need to pay attention to: Pension. Bob and Jane should know the precise amount of pension income they’ll receive in 2021, though the amount may be higher than 2020 if the pension is inflation-linked. Dividends and interest. They can know with fair certainty the interest payments they’ll receive, as well as what dividends they’ll receive from individual stocks. But they should check near year-end. Fund capital gains distributions. Last year’s distributions are, alas, a poor predictor of this year’s. Instead, Bob and Jane will want to look out for the fourth-quarter announcements from their funds, detailing the capital gains that the funds plan to distribute by year-end. Any capital losses realized in 2021. These could be used to offset gains. Any new income, potential tax deductions larger than the standard deduction, or other unexpected factors that could change the math. By waiting until the fourth quarter to realize capitals gains, Bob and Jane can know what their total income and losses from various sources will be for the full year. They’ll then be able to calculate with some precision how much in long-term capital gains they can realize at the 0% tax rate. What if they realize a bit more? The additional gains would be taxed at 15%. This would only apply to those gains over and above the $80,800 taxable-income threshold, so it wouldn’t be the end of the world. Michael Perry is a former career Army officer and external affairs executive for a Fortune 100 company. In addition to personal finance and investing, his interests include reading, traveling, being outdoors, strength training and coaching, and cocktails. His previous articles were Working My Losses and An Appreciated Gift.  [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »

Thy Will Be Done

SOMEONE I KNOW recently learned she has a rare cancer that’s already at stage four. She’s getting treated for the cancer, as well as for various complications. I’m not surprised she’s battling the disease. She’s strong, independent and driven. What is surprising? She’s never written a will, and must now deal with that along with a serious medical issue. Moreover, among her three adult children, one still lives at home—and has a child of her own. Both mother and child are entirely dependent on Grandma for financial support. Why don’t people get wills drawn up? It may be the complexity. Who should get the house? Who should get the car—or should it be sold and cash distributed? Who should get Grandpa’s watch? Would a trust be better? It can seem like a lot of decisions, especially if you’re dealing with a life-threatening illness. My advice: Don’t let yourself end up in this situation—and don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Pull up a free or low-cost template for your state from the many available on the internet and fill in the blanks. If it helps, assume you only have an hour left in the world to do it. Keep it simple. Consider letting your heirs figure out how to handle the house, the car and various possessions. The most important thing is to make clear that these assets should pass to them. Head down to your local notary, grab a couple of witnesses who aren’t named in the will, and you’ll be done. Naming someone to take care of minor children or pets is more involved, as you’d want to discuss this with whoever you’re naming. In some states, designated guardians may also need to sign, showing that they’ve accepted their role. Wait, don’t you need a lawyer? Maybe, maybe not. In any case, do a will yourself first. It will help you start thinking about what you want. And if you should die before you get around to consulting an attorney, you won’t die intestate—meaning, without a will. Having a will is crucial to reduce legal wrangling and family fights after your death, including battles over who should take care of any children still considered minors. As for Grandpa’s watch and other possessions, create a document separate from the will that lists your desires. This isn’t legally binding, but it can help your heirs and executor know what your preferences would have been. Such a list is also easier to add to or change than the will itself.
Read more »

Hurricane Beryl aftermath

Last week as Hurricane Beryl approached our Texas storage unit, the company notified us that the office would be closed until further notice, a sensible precaution to let staff stay home to ride out the storm. Beryl came through on July 8. The office is still closed, with apparently no one working from home. The area has also been without power since the storm, which means that our climate controlled unit is, well - not.  So, we’re getting a little concerned about some of our belongings in the heat and humidity of the season. Meanwhile, we’re out of the country with no plans to be back until 2025. We gave a call to our insurance company to let them know the situation and check our options. It turns out while we have very good renters insurance, there are significant limitations on what it will cover in a storage unit. That’s a bummer. Because we’re nomadic, the storage unit contains almost everything we own. Once power is on, we may ask a friend to go over and do a look and smell test. We’re getting prepared in our minds for that to fail or be inconclusive and for at least one of us to have to go back and see what’s what. We figure if there’s a potential humidity/mold problem emerging, it may be better to scuttle our plans and deal with it now rather than after several months.  There will hopefully be a sequel to this post in a week or two saying everything seems fine and our life continues as planned. Or, there will be a sequel on dealing with the damage. Meanwhile, while concerned, we’re very aware that we’re only worrying about belongings, not our home or our personal health and safety, as so many there are.
Read more »

Tips for Safe Travel

TRAVELING TO AND living in foreign countries has been a big part of my adult life. My wife and I are looking forward to even more travel now that we’re no longer working. In fact, we just spent three months in Europe. It’s our second such trip since retiring late last year. Over the decades, we’ve given a fair amount of thought to how we can stay safe during our travels. Below are 10 suggestions for those venturing beyond our borders. Many of these tips also apply if you’re traveling within the U.S. 1. Safeguard your passport. Sure, this is common sense. But it’s first on the list for a reason. Take it seriously. There are different places to secure your passport—hotel safe, double closure pocket, hidden travel wallet. Make a photocopy or take a picture of the personal information page with your phone, and keep your actual passport safely tucked away. Many times, when folks ask for your passport, all they really need is the info that’s on it. But have no doubt: The airline taking you home wants the real thing. Replacing credit cards or a driver’s license would be a hassle. But those pale in comparison with trying to get home without a passport or replacing it while overseas. 2. Separate your credit cards. Replacing credit cards outside your home country isn’t as simple as getting new ones in the mail. If you have more than one—and you should if you travel—keep them separate so they aren’t all lost or stolen at once. For example, my wife and I travel with two joint credit cards. I carry card A in my wallet, and card B is with my passport. My wife carries her card B, and her card A is with her passport. Of course, both A and B have no foreign transaction fees. When we want to pay for something, one of us pulls out whichever card we want to use. If one of our wallets is lost or stolen, only one account is compromised, and we can use the other. There’s also a card C, which is our main one and waits for us at home. That account is safe even if all our stuff is stolen. Extra tip: Have apps for your cards set up on your phone so you can easily lock the account as soon as you know your card is missing, no matter what time it is at home. 3. Separate your IDs. If some piece of identification gets stolen despite your best efforts, it’s good to have a backup. You should always carry identification, but that doesn’t have to be your passport. You might keep a driver’s license in your wallet and secure your passport somewhere else. I take my retired military identification with me overseas, along with my Global Entry card, but I don’t keep all these together. 4. Get a travel wallet. It might be anywhere on your body, but the key is that it’s hard to see and hard to pick if it is seen. I suggest using it for important items and then continuing to carry a normal wallet so you can pay for stuff or produce ID without revealing you have another wallet hidden. My regular wallet has my driver’s license, a single credit card, a debit card, a health insurance card and some cash. I don’t always use my hidden travel wallet, but it’s nice to have. I’ve used it when I’m forced to carry a lot of cash, or when I know I’ll need to produce my physical passport but don’t want it in my open pocket all day. I also use it on travel days when passing through high pickpocket areas, such as a train station. 5. Identify your bags. Make sure your suitcase, backpack or purse has your contact details inside. Also, put something on it that makes it quickly and easily identifiable as yours. A distinctive ribbon or piece of tape also helps owners of similar-looking bags realize it’s not theirs. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] We’ve never used Apple AirTags, but I’ve read that these and similar coin-sized devices were the only reason lots of travelers got their lost luggage back this summer. They’re small and cheap enough that we’re going to consider using them not only for luggage, but also for our wallets and keys. It’s not unheard of for a thief to remove cash and toss the wallet or purse in the trash. It would be nice to at least get the other stuff back. 6. Pack mindfully. In some situations, you may not be able to keep control of your bags in the way you’d want. Several times in the last few months, we’ve had to stow luggage under a bus. Other people were getting off and taking luggage—out of our sight—while we remained on board. We’ve also had to stow bags on a rack two train cars down from our seats, as well as in other less-than-optimal situations. Make sure that, when you pack, your most important items are in a backpack or purse that’s always under your direct control. 7. Consider hiding valuables. Put things you care about deeper in your backpack, not in the most convenient outer pocket. If you lock belongings in a car trunk, consider putting your most valuable items in an innocuous plastic bag. A thief who breaks in will most likely grab your luggage—but not every little thing in the trunk. Not everywhere you stay is going to have a safe, so consider hiding things you care about elsewhere in your room. I’m one of those people who might forget he did this until he’s 50 miles away, so I’d have to be pretty concerned to take that extra step. Hello travel wallet. 8. Secure your communications. Continue to observe good internet safety practices. Recognize this may be harder when you’re away from home. Just because your hotel wi-fi requires a password doesn’t mean it’s secure. If your phone comes with a personal hotspot, you can use it to generate a more secure internet connection for your computer. Speaking of phones, add a PIN code to your SIM card. It’s not inconvenient to you, as the device will generally only ask for it when it’s completely powered off and back on. It will, however, prevent a thief who steals your phone from using your SIM card. If you’re traveling with a computer, secure it with a password, too. 9. Carry some cash. Sometimes, there’s no substitute. On those occasions, it may not matter much what currency it is. U.S. dollars always seem to work in a pinch. Don’t keep all your cash in the same place. (I was going to make a joke about carrying traveler’s checks, but I just learned those are still around, though far less used these days and probably not a good option for most people.) 10. Observe good personal safety practices. Be alert, no matter where you are. Some areas will be more prone to criminal activity, but—as a foreigner—you may not realize you’ve stumbled into a riskier part of town. Looking for further suggestions? The FBI has published tips for business travelers and students. Michael Perry is a former career Army officer and external affairs executive for a Fortune 100 company. In addition to personal finance and investing, his interests include reading, traveling, being outdoors, strength training and coaching, and cocktails. Check out his earlier articles. [xyz-ihs snippet="Donate"]
Read more »