FREE NEWSLETTER

When you retire, be freer with your money—and more parsimonious with your time.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Handling Aging Aunt’s Finances

"It sounds like you are on top of things but here is a list of items for you to consider: Helping Mom and Dad - HumbleDollar"
- Howard Rohleder
Read more »

HumbleDollar Friend Request

"Totally brilliant!!!!! (Please excuse the excessive use of punctuation and parentheses)"
- DAN SMITH
Read more »

A Simple Use of Wealth

"I have no vacation home myself, but I am a homeowner and I feel your pain Mark."
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

There are two things humans (at least Americans) are not programmed to handle rationally – taxes and spending on health care. 

"I have no children, and I the county I live in has the highest property taxes in the state (NC), with a good chunk going to our excellent public schools. I am perfectly happy with paying that money, though I would prefer to pay higher state taxes so the rest of the state could have better funded schools."
- Brian White
Read more »

About those US medical costs….

"Or you could deal with this. Many sources indicate that UK hospitals are underfunded, with the British Medical Association stating that growth in health spending has been below average since 2010, leading to a cumulative underspend and impacting the ability to staff, modernize, and meet demand. This has resulted in significant challenges such as long waiting lists, staff shortages, and a crisis in emergency care"
- R Quinn
Read more »

Optimizer or Satisficer?

"I think anyone following some form of asset allocation, e.g.,60/40, 70/30, etc. is a Satisficer. It's my guess that an Optimizer might not stick around on HD for very long."
- Jeff Bond
Read more »

The Flamingo Years: How to Lose Gracefully to a Ten-Year-Old

"I would encourage your idea of home exercise equipment. I am 76 years old. I have had equipment at home for at least 30 years. Because it is at home, I can do some activity every day, which I do. I used to just do calisthenics after running outside. As time went on, I purchased different equipment as my needs changed, such as getting kettle bells, some dumb bells and resistance bands as I have gotten older, to do weight training. For me having stuff at home has made it easy to exercise regularly. Bob"
- Mom & Dad Schneider
Read more »

Don’t make the wrong Medicare decision

"In some cases it's easy. Either the surgeon in question does a lot of the latest surgery for my eye disease or they do it infrequently or do an older version. They also get good reports from patients posting to the relevant support group."
- mytimetotravel
Read more »

Don’t Give Up on the Wayward Kid

"It sounds like she has an amazing mind and a very nice way with people. Congratulations to the two of you! Bob"
- Mom & Dad Schneider
Read more »

Roth Hidden Benefits

WHEN MOST PEOPLE think of Roth IRAs or Roth 401(k)s, they just think "tax-free withdrawals." But that’s only part of the story. Roth accounts can protect you from financial traps that catch many retirees off guard. Here are five key advantages to keep in mind:   1. Tax Rate Protection One thing we can’t control is future tax rates. Did you know that in the 1980s, the highest federal tax rate was 50%? In the 1970s, it was 70%, and in the 1960s, it was as high as 91%. Right now, we're living in an era of historically low tax rates, but that may or may not last forever. We know that in 2025, the federal deficit was ~$1.8 trillion, and raising taxes could be one of the few ways to close that gap. That’s where Roth accounts could be good to diversify with. You pay taxes now and lock in today’s rates, no matter what happens in the future. However, Roth contributions aren’t automatically the best move for everyone. It depends on your marginal tax rate today versus your expected rate in retirement. The expected one is harder to predict, and generally, using today's rates could be a good starting point.
  • If you’re in a high bracket now and expect to be in a lower one later, a traditional IRA or 401(k) may save you more.
  • If you’re in a low bracket now and expect higher taxes later, a Roth is the smarter move.
It’s not about which account is "better", it’s about which one fits your long-term tax outlook.   2. Social Security Taxation Once you start receiving Social Security income, a portion of your benefits could become taxable, depending on your other income sources. The IRS uses something called “provisional income” to determine how much of your benefits are taxed. It includes:
  • Wages and self-employment income
  • Traditional IRA or 401(k) withdrawals
  • Dividends, interest, and capital gains
  • Rental income
  • 1/2 of your Social Security benefits
If you’re single and your provisional income is below $25,000, your Social Security is 100% tax-free. Between $25,000 and $34,000, up to 50% of your benefits are taxed. Above $34,000, up to 85% may be taxable. For married couples, those thresholds are $32,000 and $44,000. The key advantage: Roth withdrawals do not count toward provisional income. That means you can tap your Roth IRA or Roth 401(k) in retirement without increasing your Social Security tax bill.   3. Medicare Premiums Once you enroll in Medicare, your Part B and Part D premiums are based on your income. If your income exceeds $106,000 (single) or $212,000 (married filing jointly), you’ll face higher premiums under the IRMAA rules. The more income you have, the higher your premiums. At the top levels, they can almost triple. The good news is that Roth IRA withdrawals don’t count toward that income calculation. So by using Roth funds in retirement, you can avoid Medicare surcharges and keep your healthcare costs lower.   4. Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s eventually force you to take withdrawals, even if you don’t need the money. Generally, starting at age 73, you must take Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) each year, and those withdrawals are taxable. They can also push you into a higher bracket, make more of your Social Security taxable, and even raise your Medicare premiums. Roth IRAs have no RMDs during your lifetime. That means you control when to withdraw, not the IRS, allowing your money to grow tax-free as long as you want.   5. Early Withdrawal Penalty When you withdraw from a 401(k) or traditional IRA early, you have to pay a 10% penalty along with taxes on the amount withdrawn (unless an exception applies, such as Rule of 55 or SoSEPP) For Roth accounts, the rules are different. With a Roth IRA, you can always withdraw your contributions (not earnings) at any time, completely tax- and penalty-free. However, the same does not apply to a Roth 401(k). If you withdraw funds from a Roth 401(k) before age 59½, each withdrawal is pro rata, meaning a portion is treated as contributions and a portion as earnings. The earnings portion will be taxed and penalized. This treatment differs once you roll over your Roth 401(k) into a Roth IRA. After the rollover, your payroll contributions and earnings are logically separated. There’s no 5-year waiting period for accessing your rolled-over contributions, because a rollover from Roth to Roth is not a conversion. So, if you want early access flexibility, moving your Roth 401(k) funds into a Roth IRA after leaving your employer can be a smart move. And if your income is too high for a direct Roth IRA contribution, you can still get in through the Backdoor Roth strategy.   Be Smart Roth accounts offer tremendous flexibility and long-term tax benefits, but that doesn’t mean everyone should contribute. The real key is understanding your marginal tax rate today versus what it’s likely to be in retirement. If you’re in a high bracket now, it may make more sense to take the deduction today through a traditional IRA or 401(k), and convert to a Roth later when your income (and tax rate) is lower, a strategy known as a Roth conversion. On the other hand, if you’re in a low bracket now, for example, early in your career or between jobs, paying taxes upfront through a Roth contribution could save you far more over time.   Final Thoughts Roth accounts can shield you from rising taxes, Social Security taxation, Medicare surcharges, RMDs, and early withdrawal penalties, but the biggest advantage comes from using them strategically. Don’t contribute just because "tax-free = good". Run the numbers, compare your current and future rates, and build a mix of pre-tax and Roth savings that gives you flexibility no matter what tax policy looks like in the future. In the end, true tax planning isn’t about predicting the future. It’s about positioning yourself to win under any scenario.   Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.
Read more »

Disappointed (and annoyed) with Vanguard.

"I have done similar transfers from varies brokerages, like M-1, Schwab, etc that charged me $100 to transfer out into Fidelity where they promptly credit me the fees but the difference here is that they were not considered taxable income, just credit into my accounts."
- achnk53
Read more »

The Paradox of Smart Money Decisions

SOME YEARS AGO, the scientist Edward Fredkin identified a quirk of human behavior. When it comes to making decisions, Fredkin found, we tend to allocate our time inefficiently. Suppose, for example, you’re at the grocery store, looking for something basic like paper towels. In a big supermarket, there might be a dozen or more choices. The result: Because there are so many options, it can be hard to choose among them. In the absence of big differences, Fredkin observed, we tend to get bogged down by the details and spend an inordinate amount of time over-analyzing small differences.  In Fredkin’s view, there’s nothing wrong with being a careful consumer. If it takes just a minute to calculate which brand of paper towels is the better deal, there’s nothing wrong with that. The larger concern, in Fredkin’s view, is how consumers approach bigger, more consequential decisions, where the outcome can have a material impact. Because these larger questions are harder to answer—and thus require more mental energy—Fredkin found that people tend to spend less time than they should on them. In many cases, for example, we might procrastinate on a decision because it’s complicated or feels like a black box. That’s Fredkin’s paradox: We tend to spend less time on decisions that can really move the needle and more time on relatively minor questions where the result won’t make much of a difference either way. Fredkin’s paradox presents itself frequently in personal finance. Suppose, for example, you’re selecting investments for your portfolio and are trying to decide whether Fidelity’s new zero-fee mutual funds would be a good choice. To help decide, you could compare the performance of these funds to comparable funds from Vanguard, which offers funds that are very low-cost but not entirely free.  Here’s what you’d find: Over the past five years, Fidelity’s zero-cost total-market fund (ticker: FZROX) has beaten its closest Vanguard competitor (ticker: VTSAX) by about two percentage points. That would seem to make sense. If two funds are essentially the same, but one carries a fee and the other doesn’t, it stands to reason that the no-fee fund would come out ahead. But that’s just one fund.  If you look at another of these no-fee funds, you’ll see precisely the opposite result. Over the past five years, Vanguard’s S&P 500 fund (ticker: VFIAX) has beaten Fidelity’s zero-cost equivalent by a few points. What, then, should an investor conclude about these zero-fee funds? Based on the data, there’s no clear conclusion. And that’s where Fredkin’s paradox kicks in. Without a clear answer, a smart consumer would be inclined to continue researching the question, looking for some difference that might tip the scales. That seems logical. But what Fredkin would tell us is that it simply isn’t worth the effort. Ultimately, the cost difference among all these funds is insignificant, and thus, the results are likely to be almost identical. Informal as it might sound, we should simply choose one and move on. That would free up time to spend on bigger-picture decisions which are likely to make more of a difference. As the end of the year approaches, here are a dozen such questions that may be worth your time:
  1. Because it can be complicated, health insurance is an area that’s definitely susceptible to Fredkin’s paradox. But with the annual open enrollment period approaching, it’s worth reviewing the options. The savings could easily be in the thousands.
  2. Mortgage rates have been elevated for more than three years, but they’ve ticked down in recent months. If the rate on your mortgage is north of 6.5%, it’s worth looking into a refinance. The good thing about refinancing is that it’s a straightforward, mathematical decision. It just requires a lot of paperwork, and that can be a deterrent. My rule of thumb: If the lower rate will offset the fees associated with the refinance within 12 months, then I think it's worth the effort. With refinancing, you can always revisit it again if rates drop further.
  3. Similarly, if you have other loans outstanding, it can be invaluable to shop around.
  4. Do you own any actively-managed mutual funds? If they’re in a taxable account, they could be quietly adding to your tax bill. To see if that’s the case, navigate to Schedule D of your 2024 tax return and look for the line that reads “capital gain distributions.” If there’s a meaningful number on that line, find out which funds are driving these gains and ask whether it might make sense to sell them before the next round of distributions, which are typically near year-end.
  5. If you’re in your working years, it’s usually safe to assume that your tax rate in retirement will be lower than it is during your peak earning years. If cash flow permits, try to contribute the maximum to a pre-tax account, such as a 401(k) or 403(b). Even if you’re self-employed, there are plenty of easy retirement accounts you can set up for yourself, such as a solo 401(k) or SEP IRA.
  6. Does your employer offer other tax-advantaged accounts, such as a health savings account (HSA) or flexible spending account (FSA)? They carry limitations but are worth considering.
  7. If you’re in retirement, it’s worth reviewing your strategy for drawing funds out of your retirement accounts. The biggest mistake I see: not taking advantage of the window between retirement and age 73 or 75, when required minimum distributions begin. If your tax rate is very low during these years—especially if you’re in the 10% or 12% bracket—it’s worth considering additional IRA distributions, ideally in the form of Roth conversions.
  8. Checking your homeowner’s and auto insurance policies might sound about as interesting as watching paint dry, but they’re worth checking. Be sure that your coverage levels are still sufficient, especially on the liability side, and make sure you have umbrella coverage. If you have jewelry like an engagement ring, be sure it’s scheduled separately. Finally, ask what discounts your insurer offers. Some will knock off close to 10% if you pay in full for the year. If you have teenage drivers, good grades could earn a small discount as well.
  9. Are you a homeowner? Cities and towns don’t advertise this fact, but real estate tax assessments can be appealed and negotiated. If you have a basis for arguing that your assessment is out of line with comparable homes in your area, there are attorneys who specialize in preparing these appeals, and they typically work on a contingency fee basis.
  10. Be sure that the beneficiaries on your retirement accounts and life insurance policies are in line with your current wishes.
  11. Especially if you are single, make sure you have a trusted contact on file with your broker. This gives them someone to reach out to if they have concerns about your wellbeing.
  12. Is your estate plan current? While the federal estate tax exclusion is now quite high, at $15 million per person ($30 million for a couple), many states have their own estate taxes with much lower limits. Especially if you’ve moved recently, it’s worth reviewing the structure of your plan to be sure you don’t inadvertently end up paying too much.
Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Handling Aging Aunt’s Finances

"It sounds like you are on top of things but here is a list of items for you to consider: Helping Mom and Dad - HumbleDollar"
- Howard Rohleder
Read more »

HumbleDollar Friend Request

"Totally brilliant!!!!! (Please excuse the excessive use of punctuation and parentheses)"
- DAN SMITH
Read more »

A Simple Use of Wealth

"I have no vacation home myself, but I am a homeowner and I feel your pain Mark."
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

There are two things humans (at least Americans) are not programmed to handle rationally – taxes and spending on health care. 

"I have no children, and I the county I live in has the highest property taxes in the state (NC), with a good chunk going to our excellent public schools. I am perfectly happy with paying that money, though I would prefer to pay higher state taxes so the rest of the state could have better funded schools."
- Brian White
Read more »

About those US medical costs….

"Or you could deal with this. Many sources indicate that UK hospitals are underfunded, with the British Medical Association stating that growth in health spending has been below average since 2010, leading to a cumulative underspend and impacting the ability to staff, modernize, and meet demand. This has resulted in significant challenges such as long waiting lists, staff shortages, and a crisis in emergency care"
- R Quinn
Read more »

Optimizer or Satisficer?

"I think anyone following some form of asset allocation, e.g.,60/40, 70/30, etc. is a Satisficer. It's my guess that an Optimizer might not stick around on HD for very long."
- Jeff Bond
Read more »

The Flamingo Years: How to Lose Gracefully to a Ten-Year-Old

"I would encourage your idea of home exercise equipment. I am 76 years old. I have had equipment at home for at least 30 years. Because it is at home, I can do some activity every day, which I do. I used to just do calisthenics after running outside. As time went on, I purchased different equipment as my needs changed, such as getting kettle bells, some dumb bells and resistance bands as I have gotten older, to do weight training. For me having stuff at home has made it easy to exercise regularly. Bob"
- Mom & Dad Schneider
Read more »

Don’t make the wrong Medicare decision

"In some cases it's easy. Either the surgeon in question does a lot of the latest surgery for my eye disease or they do it infrequently or do an older version. They also get good reports from patients posting to the relevant support group."
- mytimetotravel
Read more »

Don’t Give Up on the Wayward Kid

"It sounds like she has an amazing mind and a very nice way with people. Congratulations to the two of you! Bob"
- Mom & Dad Schneider
Read more »

The Paradox of Smart Money Decisions

SOME YEARS AGO, the scientist Edward Fredkin identified a quirk of human behavior. When it comes to making decisions, Fredkin found, we tend to allocate our time inefficiently. Suppose, for example, you’re at the grocery store, looking for something basic like paper towels. In a big supermarket, there might be a dozen or more choices. The result: Because there are so many options, it can be hard to choose among them. In the absence of big differences, Fredkin observed, we tend to get bogged down by the details and spend an inordinate amount of time over-analyzing small differences.  In Fredkin’s view, there’s nothing wrong with being a careful consumer. If it takes just a minute to calculate which brand of paper towels is the better deal, there’s nothing wrong with that. The larger concern, in Fredkin’s view, is how consumers approach bigger, more consequential decisions, where the outcome can have a material impact. Because these larger questions are harder to answer—and thus require more mental energy—Fredkin found that people tend to spend less time than they should on them. In many cases, for example, we might procrastinate on a decision because it’s complicated or feels like a black box. That’s Fredkin’s paradox: We tend to spend less time on decisions that can really move the needle and more time on relatively minor questions where the result won’t make much of a difference either way. Fredkin’s paradox presents itself frequently in personal finance. Suppose, for example, you’re selecting investments for your portfolio and are trying to decide whether Fidelity’s new zero-fee mutual funds would be a good choice. To help decide, you could compare the performance of these funds to comparable funds from Vanguard, which offers funds that are very low-cost but not entirely free.  Here’s what you’d find: Over the past five years, Fidelity’s zero-cost total-market fund (ticker: FZROX) has beaten its closest Vanguard competitor (ticker: VTSAX) by about two percentage points. That would seem to make sense. If two funds are essentially the same, but one carries a fee and the other doesn’t, it stands to reason that the no-fee fund would come out ahead. But that’s just one fund.  If you look at another of these no-fee funds, you’ll see precisely the opposite result. Over the past five years, Vanguard’s S&P 500 fund (ticker: VFIAX) has beaten Fidelity’s zero-cost equivalent by a few points. What, then, should an investor conclude about these zero-fee funds? Based on the data, there’s no clear conclusion. And that’s where Fredkin’s paradox kicks in. Without a clear answer, a smart consumer would be inclined to continue researching the question, looking for some difference that might tip the scales. That seems logical. But what Fredkin would tell us is that it simply isn’t worth the effort. Ultimately, the cost difference among all these funds is insignificant, and thus, the results are likely to be almost identical. Informal as it might sound, we should simply choose one and move on. That would free up time to spend on bigger-picture decisions which are likely to make more of a difference. As the end of the year approaches, here are a dozen such questions that may be worth your time:
  1. Because it can be complicated, health insurance is an area that’s definitely susceptible to Fredkin’s paradox. But with the annual open enrollment period approaching, it’s worth reviewing the options. The savings could easily be in the thousands.
  2. Mortgage rates have been elevated for more than three years, but they’ve ticked down in recent months. If the rate on your mortgage is north of 6.5%, it’s worth looking into a refinance. The good thing about refinancing is that it’s a straightforward, mathematical decision. It just requires a lot of paperwork, and that can be a deterrent. My rule of thumb: If the lower rate will offset the fees associated with the refinance within 12 months, then I think it's worth the effort. With refinancing, you can always revisit it again if rates drop further.
  3. Similarly, if you have other loans outstanding, it can be invaluable to shop around.
  4. Do you own any actively-managed mutual funds? If they’re in a taxable account, they could be quietly adding to your tax bill. To see if that’s the case, navigate to Schedule D of your 2024 tax return and look for the line that reads “capital gain distributions.” If there’s a meaningful number on that line, find out which funds are driving these gains and ask whether it might make sense to sell them before the next round of distributions, which are typically near year-end.
  5. If you’re in your working years, it’s usually safe to assume that your tax rate in retirement will be lower than it is during your peak earning years. If cash flow permits, try to contribute the maximum to a pre-tax account, such as a 401(k) or 403(b). Even if you’re self-employed, there are plenty of easy retirement accounts you can set up for yourself, such as a solo 401(k) or SEP IRA.
  6. Does your employer offer other tax-advantaged accounts, such as a health savings account (HSA) or flexible spending account (FSA)? They carry limitations but are worth considering.
  7. If you’re in retirement, it’s worth reviewing your strategy for drawing funds out of your retirement accounts. The biggest mistake I see: not taking advantage of the window between retirement and age 73 or 75, when required minimum distributions begin. If your tax rate is very low during these years—especially if you’re in the 10% or 12% bracket—it’s worth considering additional IRA distributions, ideally in the form of Roth conversions.
  8. Checking your homeowner’s and auto insurance policies might sound about as interesting as watching paint dry, but they’re worth checking. Be sure that your coverage levels are still sufficient, especially on the liability side, and make sure you have umbrella coverage. If you have jewelry like an engagement ring, be sure it’s scheduled separately. Finally, ask what discounts your insurer offers. Some will knock off close to 10% if you pay in full for the year. If you have teenage drivers, good grades could earn a small discount as well.
  9. Are you a homeowner? Cities and towns don’t advertise this fact, but real estate tax assessments can be appealed and negotiated. If you have a basis for arguing that your assessment is out of line with comparable homes in your area, there are attorneys who specialize in preparing these appeals, and they typically work on a contingency fee basis.
  10. Be sure that the beneficiaries on your retirement accounts and life insurance policies are in line with your current wishes.
  11. Especially if you are single, make sure you have a trusted contact on file with your broker. This gives them someone to reach out to if they have concerns about your wellbeing.
  12. Is your estate plan current? While the federal estate tax exclusion is now quite high, at $15 million per person ($30 million for a couple), many states have their own estate taxes with much lower limits. Especially if you’ve moved recently, it’s worth reviewing the structure of your plan to be sure you don’t inadvertently end up paying too much.
Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 59: MOST FOLKS should avoid alternative investments. Yes, they promise returns uncorrelated with the stock market and gains when shares are tumbling. But isn’t that why we own bonds?

humans

NO. 18: SPENDING can give us a thrill. Just had a rough day? Others may cheer themselves up with comfort food or a beer. But for some, the antidote is to make a purchase or two, because this spending lifts their spirits. But thanks to hedonic adaptation, the thrill doesn’t last long and, taken to an extreme, such spending could cause financial problems.

Truths

NO. 14: IT ISN’T SO BAD—as long as we expect it. What’s unnerving is when our investments perform far worse than we ever imagined. We aren’t bothered by 1% stock-market losses—that can happen on an ordinary trading day—but we’re alarmed by the idea that the $1 share price of our money-market mutual fund might “break the buck” and fall 1% to 99 cents.

think

VOLATILITY. A volatile portfolio isn’t just nerve-racking. It also hurts compounding. Suppose portfolio No. 1 gains 10% this year and next, while No. 2 climbs 30%, only to lose 10% in the second year. The portfolios might appear to have the same return. But in fact, No. 1 would gain a cumulative 21%, vs. 17% for No. 2. Want to reduce volatility? The key is diversification.

Borrowing

Manifesto

NO. 59: MOST FOLKS should avoid alternative investments. Yes, they promise returns uncorrelated with the stock market and gains when shares are tumbling. But isn’t that why we own bonds?

Spotlight: In Retirement

Three bucket strategy for financing retirement

There have been a number of articles and forum questions on best strategies for managing finances during retirement.

The choice, of course, depends on the individual situation. I came across this “three bucket” strategy that is intriguing.
First bucket is cash that meets near term needs ( one to two years of living expenses other than guaranteed income like social security.  This avoids withdrawal of investment funds during market downturns, particularly in early retirement years, which could cause “sequence of return risk”

Read more »

Steady as He Goes

WHEN I GRADUATED high school in 1961, my parents offered this advice: “Find a good company to work for and stay there.” At the time, my choices were the phone company, a major insurance company and a utility. I applied to all three and would have taken a job with any of them, but ended up at the utility. I worked there until I retired in January 2010.

Today, my parents’ advice seems almost quaint,

Read more »

Don’t Delay

I’M GOING TO BE 70 next year and I think I’m in pretty good shape. I do 25 pushups before bed, along with some stretching. I usually go for a long walk in the morning and, once in a while, I might head out for a hike. On top of that, I do strengthening exercises three times a week.
I don’t take medication or have any chronic ailments. Of course, you can never be sure what’s going on with your body,

Read more »

The Habits of Old Men

I’ve always been a man of habits and routines, but it seems that these days, as a 72 year old retiree, I adhere to them even more. I’m not yet on the level of Dustin Hoffman’s Rainman with Judge Wapner, but I’m getting there.
Maybe it’s because I have more control over my schedule now and so can more faithfully indulge these habits. Or maybe the calcification of my brain and the well known tendency of old folks to dislike change have combined to make me ever more dedicated to them.

Read more »

It’s Who You Know

LEAVING BEHIND full-time work leaves a void. How will you fill it? In my semi-retirement, I’ve found four communities.
I grew up in Fort Worth, Texas, but moved throughout my career. Fifteen years ago, I returned to Texas and—as part of my relocation—”pioneered” working from home. I’ve spent the past few years reconnecting with classmates from elementary school through high school, meeting them individually for lunch and using Facebook to arrange annual mini-reunions. I’ve known some of these folks for more than 55 years.

Read more »

Which is the best and why for retirement income

I’ve always been a growth investor. But as retirement nears I’ve been questioning whether it is better to stay investing for growth and sell some of it monthly for income or to invest in dividend paying stocks or stock funds for income.
Which is a better path to take and why? Thank you all as always for your input

Read more »

Spotlight: Mcintosh

Parting Advice

HALF OF THE COLLEGE students I taught last semester just graduated. A few are going on to graduate school, but most are starting accounting, finance or other business careers. For my classes with a heavy concentration of seniors, I reserve the last five minutes of the final class to give them a few career tips. In keeping with my overall teaching approach, I keep the message simple: Do what you enjoy. Now, this isn’t the usual “follow your passion” pitch you hear in so many commencement addresses. In fact, I start by saying that most of us won’t follow our passion. Often, it isn’t practical to do so. Because we can’t all be passion-driven, we need to find ways to make our day-to-day work enjoyable. I encourage my graduates to find ways to incorporate things they enjoy into their career. There are two specific tips I share. First, I recommend graduates use their skills to enter an industry that interests them. Many students have “dream” industries they’d like to work in, such as sports, not-for-profits and life sciences. But most judge it too difficult to land a job in these industries, so they apply to businesses that don’t excite them. To be sure, graduates with technical majors—think accounting and information technology—may have an easier time getting their foot in the door of a preferred industry. But all graduates have skills, such as problem solving and communication, that are useful in any industry. If you have a genuine interest in an industry, I believe you should make putting your skills to work in that industry your focus. The fact is, if you’re working in your “dream” industry, chances are you’ll be more successful and more fulfilled. Second, I encourage graduates to prioritize doing things they enjoy at work. These things might not be specifically related to your day-to-day responsibilities. Instead, they might include things like recruiting new employees from your alma mater, leading training sessions or working on special projects. It could even include organizing the company’s sports teams. Assuming you do these things well and they don’t detract from your core duties, you’ll be viewed favorably by your manager and your peers—and you’ll likely enjoy your job more.
Read more »

Quality or Quantity?

Every three years or so, I can't resist the temptation to buy disposable razors at Costco. Given the disposables are about $1 each, they are about a third of the price of buying razor cartridges. About a week into the purchase, however, I am reminded why I prefer the cartridges. While more expensive, the cartridges provide a better shave and they last about 3 times as long. While the initial impression I get is that I am getting a bargain, I sacrifice quality and at best I am breakeven on the transaction. What examples do you have on times when a focus on price was more costly than if you'd ponied up for a better quality product in the first place?
Read more »

Back on Target

AS A COLLEGE professor, there are a few times during the year when things quiet down. During these lulls, I take on tasks that have moved to the bottom of the to-do list. The items include things like doctor’s appointments, home repairs and portfolio rebalancing. I can hear my students’ reaction: “But professor, you teach us about investing in companies and you write about investing. Why do you drop your portfolio review to the bottom of the list?” Valid question. I find reviewing our portfolio to be tedious. Also, the ultimate output of the process—shift some percent of our portfolio from investment A to investment B—doesn’t get my juices flowing. I’d rather read company financial statements and debate valuations. But I know that regular rebalancing is necessary, so I do it a few times a year. Here’s the process I follow. We have almost all our money at a single brokerage firm, Schwab, but it’s still a manual process to summarize our positions across our nine accounts. This may sound like too many accounts, but all of them have a specific purpose. Beyond our standard brokerage account, my wife and I both have rollover and Roth IRA accounts. We also have custodial and 529 accounts for our two children. I haven’t found a way on Schwab.com to generate a report on our combined accounts, given the different Social Security numbers involved. Instead, I lean on my Excel skills to summarize the data. To our Schwab data, I add the positions from our employer-sponsored defined contribution plans. Once I’ve got all the information downloaded, I categorize each investment as U.S. stocks, international stocks, bonds and cash. Once I do this, I use a “SUMIF” formula in Excel to determine the market value for each category. The final step is to calculate our total investment portfolio’s percentage allocation to each category and compare those allocations to our targets. Based on our investing experience and age, we use the following targets: 55% to 60% U.S. stocks, 20% to 25% international stocks, 15% to 20% bonds and less than 5% cash. How are things looking? Our allocations to international stocks and bonds were spot on. The main issue was that, at 9%, we had too much cash, and we were low on our allocation to U.S. stocks. To rectify the situation, we shifted about half the extra cash to a few U.S. stock index funds. To get the rest of the cash invested, I increased our semi-monthly automatic U.S. stock investments. Thanks to that increase, our remaining excess cash will be invested by the end of the summer.
Read more »

Missing Takeoff

LIKE MOST READERS of this site, I’m committed to index fund investing. Still, even though I know I’d have little chance of beating the market as a stock-picker, I’m periodically tempted to buy individual stocks. When a former mentor who’s a brilliant strategist joined Moderna in May 2020, I strongly considered buying shares. Given where the economy was at the time, I passed on buying the company’s shares (symbol: MRNA) and stuck to my standard S&P 500-index fund investing. In hindsight, this was a mistake. As a daily viewer of CNBC, it’s been hard to ignore the performance of Moderna over the past 16 months. It has increased more than 300% in 2021 and yesterday it was up more than 17%. As I watched CNBC yesterday, I said to myself, “It’s a bummer I didn’t buy shares last year, but at least I’m getting some upside now that Moderna is in the S&P 500.” I spent a little time analyzing this attempt at rationalization—and the results weren’t consoling. Moderna was trading at $321 per share on July 21, the day it joined the S&P 500. On that date, it made up 0.26% of the index. If you had $10,000 invested in an S&P 500 fund, you indirectly owned $26 worth of Moderna stock—about one-twelfth of a share—when it joined the index. Since joining the S&P 500 index, Moderna stock has climbed some 50% to more than $484 per share at yesterday’s close. Assuming the same $10,000 investment, you have made about $13 on Moderna over the past few weeks. You read that right: Despite Moderna’s substantial price appreciation, the money you made would barely buy avocado toast. My conclusions? First, you won’t get rich quickly through index fund investing. While you’re well-diversified against the risk of any one stock cratering, you’ll also see limited upside from a superstar like Moderna. Second, Moderna has risen to have a market capitalization of close to $200 billion, but it still has a relatively small S&P 500 weighting. The top five companies in the index—Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet—comprise more than 20% of the index, so even moderate price swings by these stocks will impact the index much more than significant changes in a company of Moderna’s size. Finally, if you periodically get well-informed gut feelings about individual stocks, it may be worth setting aside a small pool of funds to buy these stocks. Such a mini-portfolio won’t be well-diversified. But you’ll likely have fun with it and, at worst, some losses—and those losses will serve as a reminder to stick with your index funds.
Read more »

Resolved: Three Tasks

MY FIRST RESOLUTION for 2022 is to clean up my investment portfolio. While my garage and my closets are in good order, I shudder when I review my brokerage account. Over the years, I’ve accumulated close to 20 mutual funds and exchange-traded funds. Overall, I’ve done well with these investments—most of which are based on stock market indexes—but it’s an unnecessary hodge-podge. By the end of the year, I plan to sell a majority of these positions and consolidate the proceeds in a target-date fund. I value the simplicity of target funds, with their regularly rebalanced mix of U.S. shares, international stocks and bonds. My second resolution for 2022 is to update my life-insurance strategy. When my son was born in 2007, I purchased a 15-year term policy. That policy expires in June 2022. First, I need to consider whether I should continue to carry life insurance. Given the increase in our savings over the past 15 years, life insurance may be an unnecessary expense. If I do opt to keep coverage, I’ll weigh whether it’s prudent to continue with term insurance or shift to a whole-life policy. This latter wasn’t on my radar in 2007, but my basic understanding of whole-life insurance tells me it could be worth considering. My third resolution is to create an investment roadmap for my wife. I periodically update her on the value and composition of our portfolio. Still, she’d be hard-pressed to take over management of our investments. My plan is to create a document that describes our accounts, including our brokerage, retirement, custodial and 529 plan accounts. I’ll also document our passwords—in a secure manner, of course—and provide the numbers for her to call if she needs to talk to someone about the accounts. A final note: Thank you to those readers who have provided insightful comments on my 2021 articles and blog posts. I’ve learned a lot from you—especially regarding hybrid and electric vehicles—and I look forward to getting more feedback in the year ahead.
Read more »

Mixed Bag

WHEN DESIGNING a portfolio, a critical decision is how to allocate your money across stocks, bonds and other investments. Within stocks, you’ll need to make an additional choice: How to split money between U.S. and international. A quick survey of finance-related websites turns up recommendations of 25% to 40% for an investor’s foreign stock allocation. While I agree that investors should have a meaningful percentage of their portfolio in overseas stocks, I don’t think investors should lose sleep over whether they’re at the high or low end of this range. The reason: Companies in U.S. stock funds have significant foreign exposure. Ditto for stocks in international funds. For instance, the top five companies in the S&P 500—Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google’s parent Alphabet and Facebook—represent more than 20% of the S&P 500 index’s value. Based on their most recent quarterly earnings reports, I calculate that these companies on average earn more than half of their revenues outside the U.S. While the foreign sales percentage may be lower for smaller companies in the S&P 500, investors in broadly diversified U.S. stock funds clearly have substantial international exposure. Similarly, international stock funds offer significant exposure to the U.S. economy. I analyzed the revenue mix of the top five companies in the MSCI EAFE index, namely Nestle, ASML, Roche, LVMH and Novartis. Using recent earnings reports, I calculate that an average 30% of revenues for these companies were earned in the U.S. While these five stocks only represent 8% of the MSCI EAFE index’s value—it’s a much less concentrated index than the S&P 500—there’s no doubt that international firms have significant exposure to the U.S. economy. My allocation advice: Instead of trying to perfect your allocation to international stock funds, spend more time making sure your overall allocation to all stocks is correct because that, more than anything, will drive your portfolio’s risk level.
Read more »