I HAVE NEVER BROKEN a New Year’s resolution—because, until this year, I’ve never made one. But now that I’m retired, with time on my hands, I figure my wife and I ought to challenge ourselves with 10 financial resolutions for 2020:
John Yeigh is an engineer with an MBA in finance. He retired in 2017 after 40 years in the oil industry, where he helped negotiate financial details for multi-billion-dollar international projects. His previous articles include Death and Taxes, Take a Break and 7,000 Days.
Want to receive our weekly newsletter? Sign up now. How about our daily alert about the site's latest posts? Join the list.
Maybe it’s time to include a charitable gift of time, talent and treasure ?
Yep – I volunteer coach kids, mentor college kids, am actively involved in environmental volunteering, and regularly support youth-sports advocacy programs.
I share many of the same demographics and concerns, including a consideration regarding portfolio rebalancing. Yet each time I step back fearing that, by whatever name, I’m dipping a toe into the dreaded “market timing”. I’d welcome feedback and comments on the question, “don’t all buy/sell decisions have some element of timing involved?”
Unless you robotically rebalance at, say, the start of every year, there’s inevitably some judgment call involved. But I wouldn’t fret too much over that. Instead, the danger comes when you aren’t merely rebalancing back to your target asset allocation, but consciously deciding to stray from your targets.
I think #5 is an interesting question on Social Security. If your spouse’s SS benefits are less than half of yours it makes no sense to delay after Full Retirement Age for her as spousal benefits don’t grow after that date. Also actuarially unless you assume you both live past 80+ starting the lower benefit early hedges an early death. And on expense cutting have you culled your credit card annual fees too?
Finally I’m doing something better than one of HD’s writers! re: #10, I ignore the market TWO days a week – Saturday and Sunday.
re: #2 sort of, my favorite article to date on the gambler’s fallacy applied to investing.
#6 and #7 seem a little inconsistent. You take advantage of having your 19 and 25 yr old on your health insurance(#7) passed by the business-unfriendly party. On the other hand, you are concerned that if the business-unfriendly party(#6) wins you might have to pay more taxes. Free lunch?
I have to admit, the guardian thing was tough for us. Doubly so since our oldest has special needs. We didn’t really have anyone suitable, for a variety of reasons, and rotated that designation among two sets of friends as considerations changed. We like our families, but none of them were really ready / able for that kind of responsibility… yet none of them would have liked to hear that. We never found an optimal solution, which explains why I’m so relieved and happy that issue is done with in a few months.
Free Newsletter
Arrives weekly.